How to Rate 100 Visual Stimuli Efficiently

Perceptual mapping is a method often employed in design and marketing as a means for visualizing consumer perceptions of product alternatives on the market. Perceptual maps can be computed from two types of data, from attribute ratings or from similarity judgments. In this paper, two computer-based methods are proposed for obtaining attribute rating data, based on multiple attribute scales, for a large number of visual stimuli: The hierarchical sorting method was developed from a strategy commonly employed in paper-and-pencil surveys, whereas the divide-and-conquer method was developed from a strategy often utilized in (computer) sorting of algorithms. In tests that used 100 armchairs as stimuli, it was found that both methods received high scores for simplicity and overall satisfaction in subjective evaluations by the participants. The evaluations, however, also showed that each method had its own advantages. While the divide-andconquer method produced equivalent results in a significantly less amount of time than the hierarchical sorting method, the hierarchical sorting method was considered to have a higher likelihood of expressing actual opinions than the divide-and-conquer method, due to the fact that a participant using the sorting method could focus on the details of the stimuli after they had been grouped by similarity at the initial stage.

[1]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Design and marketing of new products , 1980 .

[2]  Ulf Böckenholt,et al.  Comparative judgments as an alternative to ratings: identifying the scale origin. , 2004, Psychological methods.

[3]  J. M. Kittross The measurement of meaning , 1959 .

[4]  G. David Hughes,et al.  Some Confounding Effects of Forced-Choice Scales , 1969 .

[5]  Ralph Katz,et al.  Alternative Multidimensional Scaling Methods for Large Stimulus Sets , 1971 .

[6]  Hung-Yuan Chen,et al.  A neural network-based computer aided design tool for automotive form design , 2007 .

[7]  Jinwoo Kim,et al.  Designing emotionally evocative homepages: an empirical study of the quantitative relations between design factors and emotional dimensions , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[8]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[9]  Alfred V. Aho,et al.  Data Structures and Algorithms , 1983 .

[10]  Wen-chih Chang,et al.  Exploring Types and Characteristics of Product Forms , 2007 .

[11]  Mitsuo Nagamachi,et al.  Kansei engineering as a powerful consumer-oriented technology for product development. , 2002, Applied ergonomics.

[12]  E. Pessemier,et al.  Product Planning And Management Designing And Delivering Value , 1993 .

[13]  Álvaro Page,et al.  Application of product differential semantics to quantify purchaser perceptions in housing assessment , 2007 .

[14]  Shang H. Hsu,et al.  A semantic differential study of designers’ and users’ product form perception , 2000 .

[15]  M. Bashour,et al.  An Objective System for Measuring Facial Attractiveness , 2006, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[16]  Ming-Chuen Chuang,et al.  Expressing the expected product images in product design of micro-electronic products , 2001 .

[17]  P. Desmet,et al.  Framework of product experience , 2007 .

[18]  Yaliang Chuang,et al.  Computer-based rating method for evaluating multiple visual stimuli on multiple scales , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  Hsin-Hsi Lai,et al.  A robust design approach for enhancing the feeling quality of a product: a car profile case study , 2005 .

[20]  P. Jordan Designing Pleasurable Products: An Introduction to the New Human Factors , 2000 .

[21]  K. Hsiao,et al.  Fundamental dimensions of affective responses to product shapes , 2006 .

[22]  Jörgen Eklund,et al.  Design of rocker switches for work-vehicles--an application of Kansei Engineering. , 2005, Applied ergonomics.

[23]  Chung-Hsing Yeh,et al.  User-oriented design for the optimal combination on product design , 2006 .