Ertapenem versus ceftriaxone for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in adults: combined analysis of two multicentre randomized, double-blind studies.

The efficacy and safety of ertapenem, 1 g once a day, for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) requiring parenteral therapy were compared with those of ceftriaxone, 1 g once a day, in 866 hospitalized adults randomized in two prospective, double-blind, multicentre studies. Patients were stratified according to Pneumonia Severity Index (< or = 3 or >3) or age (< or = 65 or >65 years). After > or = 3 days of parenteral antimicrobial therapy, patients who had clinically improved could be switched to oral co-amoxiclav. The median durations of parenteral, oral and total therapy in the 658 clinically evaluable patients, of whom 88% were switched to oral therapy, were 4, 7 and 12 days, respectively, in both treatment groups. The most common pathogen was Streptococcus pneumoniae, of which 79% (143/181) were penicillin susceptible and 3.3% (6/181; three in each treatment group) were penicillin resistant. Cure rates for the two treatments were equivalent: 91.9% for ertapenem and 92.0% for ceftriaxone (95% confidence interval for the difference, adjusted for strata: -4.5 to 4.4). Cure rates in the different severity and age strata and bacterial eradication rates for both treatment groups were also similar. The most common drug-related adverse events in both treatment groups were diarrhoea and mild-to-moderate elevations in aminotransferase levels. The results of these studies demonstrate that ertapenem, 1 g once a day, was highly effective therapy for CAP in hospitalized adults with moderate-to-severe disease.

[1]  S. Pitlik,et al.  Double-blind randomized study of 1 g versus 2 g intravenous ceftriaxone daily in the therapy of community-acquired infections , 1995, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[2]  R. Isaacs,et al.  Ertapenem, the first of a new group of carbapenems. , 2003, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[3]  N. Christou,et al.  Ertapenem Versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam in the Treatment of Complicated Intraabdominal Infections: Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized Comparative Phase III Trial , 2003, Annals of surgery.

[4]  H. Teppler,et al.  Ertapenem Once a Day Versus Piperacillin–Tazobactam Every 6 Hours for Treatment of Acute Pelvic Infections: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Study , 2003, Infectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  Norbert Vetter,et al.  A prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter comparison of parenteral ertapenem and ceftriaxone for the treatment of hospitalized adults with community-acquired pneumonia. , 2002, Clinical therapeutics.

[6]  G. Woods,et al.  Ertapenem versus Ceftriaxone Followed by Appropriate Oral Therapy for Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections in Adults: Results of a Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Multicenter Study , 2002, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[7]  G. Woods,et al.  A prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study comparing ertapenem and ceftriaxone followed by appropriate oral therapy for complicated urinary tract infections in adults. , 2002, Urology.

[8]  G. Woods,et al.  Ertapenem once daily versus piperacillin-tazobactam 4 times per day for treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections in adults: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study. , 2002, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[9]  G. Woods,et al.  A study evaluating the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ertapenem versus ceftriaxone for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. , 2002, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[10]  F. Baquero,et al.  In Vitro Activities of Ertapenem (MK-0826) against Recent Clinical Bacteria Collected in Europe and Australia , 2001, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[11]  Steven D. Brown,et al.  In Vitro Activities of Ertapenem (MK-0826) against Clinical Bacterial Isolates from 11 North American Medical Centers , 2001, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[12]  Michael J Fine,et al.  Practice Guidelines for the Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults , 2000, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[13]  F. Jané,et al.  Cefepime versus Ceftriaxone for Empiric Treatment of Hospitalized Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia , 1999, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[14]  Sheldon P Stone,et al.  Community-acquired pneumonia , 1998, The Lancet.

[15]  M. Zervos,et al.  Cefepime versus Ceftriaxone for Empiric Treatment of Hospitalized Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia , 1998, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[16]  J. Bartlett,et al.  GUIDELINES FROM THE INFECTIOUS DISEASES SOCIETY OF AMERICA Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults: Guidelines for Management , 1998 .

[17]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Community-acquired pneumonia in adults: guidelines for management. The Infectious Diseases Society of America. , 1998, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[18]  T. File,et al.  A multicenter, randomized study comparing the efficacy and safety of intravenous and/or oral levofloxacin versus ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil in treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia , 1997, Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy.

[19]  J. Guest,et al.  Community-acquired pneumonia: the annual cost to the National Health Service in the UK. , 1997, The European respiratory journal.

[20]  M. Fine,et al.  A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  Graves Ej,et al.  1994 summary: National Hospital Discharge Survey. , 1996, Advance data.

[22]  P. F. Adams,et al.  Current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 1994. , 1995, Vital and health statistics. Series 10, Data from the National Health Survey.

[23]  R. van Furth,et al.  Aetiology of community-acquired pneumonia: a prospective study among adults requiring admission to hospital. , 1995, Thorax.

[24]  P. F. Adams,et al.  Current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 1994. , 1995, Vital and health statistics. Series 10, Data from the National Health Survey.

[25]  S. L. Phillips,et al.  The Use of Intramuscular Cefoperazone versus Intramuscular Ceftriaxone in Patients with Nursing Home‐Acquired Pneumonia , 1993, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[26]  P. F. Adams,et al.  Current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 1991. , 1992, Vital and health statistics. Series 10, Data from the National Health Survey.

[27]  P. Zuck,et al.  Efficacy and tolerance of cefpodoxime proxetil compared with ceftriaxone in vulnerable patients with bronchopneumonia. , 1990, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[28]  D. Schlossberg,et al.  Comparison of once-daily cephalosporin regimens for community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections in patients with chronic lung disease. , 1989, Clinical therapeutics.

[29]  Introduction to Table V. Premature deaths, monthly mortality, and monthly physician contacts--United States. , 1982, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[30]  E. Bruck,et al.  National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. , 1980, Pediatrics.

[31]  J. Enders,et al.  Infectious Diseases Society of America. , 1969, Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy.