Pedicle Morphometry in the Upper Thoracic Spine: Limits to Safe Screw Placement in Older Patients

Study Design. An anatomic study of pedicle dimensions and orientation was performed for upper thoracic vertebrae from elderly human subjects. Objectives. To quantify dimensions of thoracic pedicles, and to determine the potential for safe transpedicular screw fixation in the upper thoracic spine. Summary of Background Data. Clinical and anatomic reports support thoracic pedicle fixation as a safe, effective alternative to hook fixation in both normal and osteoporotic bone. Much available data, however, pertains to young, robust patients, thoracolumbar segments, and mixed placement techniques. Methods. For this study, T1–T6 vertebrae from 18 human cadavers were separated into individual vertebrae. Examiners measured each vertebra to determine medial–lateral pedicle width, cranial–caudal pedicle height, and coaxial depth from lamina to anterior vertebral cortex. Mean values were derived from repeated measures compared by level and side. Results. Dimension a varied with individual and level, but not between the left and right pedicles. Pedicle diameter uniformly diminished as specimens proceeded caudally from T2. Findings showed that 25% of T1 pedicles, 17% of T2 pedicles, and 42% of T3 pedicles were narrower than 5.5 mm. At T4 61% of pedicles were too small, at T5 67% were too small, and at T6 75% were too small to accept a 5.5-mm screw. Dimension b remained relatively constant. Pedicles became increasingly narrow and oblong in the T4–T6 cross sections. Dimension c increased consistently from T1 to T6. Safe screw lengths ranged from 30 mm at T1 and T2, to 35 mm at T4 –T5, to 40 mm at T5 and T6. Conclusions. Even the largest patients had some pedicles that could not accommodate the smallest standard pedicle screw, and more than one half of the pedicles average patients were too small. Transpedicular screw placement is not safe in these patients. Proper placement must avoid penetration of the medial pedicle wall.

[1]  D R Benson,et al.  Early failure of short-segment pedicle instrumentation for thoracolumbar fractures. A preliminary report. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  Tait S. Smith,et al.  Characteristics of pedicle screw loading. Effect of surgical technique on intravertebral and intrapedicular bending moments. , 1999, Spine.

[3]  M H Krag,et al.  Morphometry of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine Related to Transpedicular Screw Placement for Surgical Spinal Fixation , 1988, Spine.

[4]  J. Moran,et al.  A Morphometric Study of Human Lumbar and Selected Thoracic Vertebrae , 1987, Spine.

[5]  S. Yerby,et al.  The effect of pedicle morphometry on pedicle screw loading. A synthetic model. , 1997, Spine.

[6]  L. Wiltse,et al.  Anatomic Analysis of Pedicle Cortical and Cancellous Diameter as Related to Screw Size , 1989, Spine.

[7]  B Latimer,et al.  Vertebral Body and Posterior Element Morphology: The Normal Spine in Middle Life , 1988, Spine.

[8]  B. T. Field,et al.  A biomechanical study of intrapeduncular screw fixation in the lumbosacral spine. , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  L. Claes,et al.  Anatomy of the sheep spine and its comparison to the human spine , 1997, The Anatomical record.

[10]  Tait S. Smith,et al.  The Effect of Bone Quality on Pedicle Screw Loading in Axial Instability: A Synthetic Model , 1997, Spine.

[11]  J. Moran,et al.  Transpedicular screw fixation , 1989, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[12]  U Liljenqvist,et al.  Pullout strength of pedicle screws versus pedicle and laminar hooks in the thoracic spine. , 2001, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[13]  N. Sharkey,et al.  Lumbar pedicle screw salvage: pullout testing of three different pedicle screw designs. , 1995, Journal of spinal disorders.

[14]  T N Bernard,et al.  Pedicle Diameter Determined by Computed Tomography: Its Relevance to Pedicle Screw Fixation in the Lumbar Spine , 1992, Spine.

[15]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Thoracic Human Vertebrae Quantitative Three‐Dimensional Anatomy , 1991, Spine.

[16]  K. Murota,et al.  An Experimental Study on Transpedicular Screw Fixation in Relation to Osteoporosis of the Lumbar Spine , 1991, Spine.

[17]  Tait S. Smith,et al.  Short-segment Pedicle Instrumentation: Biomechanical Analysis of Supplemental Hook Fixation , 1996, Spine.

[18]  B. J. Doherty,et al.  A Biomechanical Study of Anterior Thoracolumbar Screw Fixation , 1998, Spine.

[19]  S. Yerby,et al.  Characteristics of pedicle screw loading. Effect of sagittal insertion angle on intrapedicular bending moments. , 1999, Spine.

[20]  S. Yerby,et al.  Offset Laminar Hooks Decrease Bending Moments of Pedicle Screws During In Situ Contouring , 1997, Spine.

[21]  S. Yerby,et al.  Revision of Failed Pedicle Screws Using Hydroxyapatite Cement: A Biomechanical Analysis , 1998, Spine.

[22]  K. Wood,et al.  Torsional Rigidity of Scoliosis Constructs , 2000, Spine.

[23]  A G Patwardhan,et al.  Analysis of the Morphometric Characteristics of the Thoracic and Lumbar Pedicles , 1987, Spine.

[24]  W. Hutton,et al.  Pedicle and transverse process screws of the upper thoracic spine. Biomechanical comparison of loads to failure. , 1999, Spine.

[25]  S. Yerby,et al.  A device for the measurement of pedicle screw moments by means of internal strain gauges. , 1996, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[26]  S. Yerby,et al.  Loading of pedicle screws within the vertebra. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  M. Krag Biomechanics of Thoracolumbar Spinal Fixation: A Review , 1991, Spine.