Judging the position of the artificial hand induces a “visual” drift towards the real one during the rubber hand illusion

When subjects look at a rubber hand being brush-stroked synchronously with their own hidden hand, they might feel a sense of ownership over the rubber hand. The perceived mislocalization of the own hand towards the rubber hand (proprioceptive drift) would reflect an implicit marker of this illusion occurring through the dominance of vision over proprioception. This account, however, contrasts with principles of multisensory integration whereby percepts result from a “statistical sum” of different sensory afferents. In this case, the most-known proprioceptive drift should be mirrored by complementary visual drift of the rubber hand in the opposite direction. We investigated this issue by designing two experiments in which subjects were not only requested to localize their own hand but also the rubber hand and further explored the subjective feeling of the illusion. In both experiments, we demonstrated a (visual) drift in the opposite direction of the proprioceptive drift, suggesting that both hands converge toward each other. This might suggest that the spatial representations of the two hands are integrated in a common percept placed in between them, contradicting previous accounts of substitution of the real hand by the rubber hand.

[1]  C. Spence,et al.  Visual Capture of Touch: Out-of-the-Body Experiences With Rubber Gloves , 2000, Psychological science.

[2]  Yoshiharu Kim,et al.  Sleep Dissolves Illusion: Sleep Withstands Learning of Visuo-Tactile-Proprioceptive Integration Induced by Repeated Days of Rubber Hand Illusion Training , 2014, PloS one.

[3]  Satoshi Hirose,et al.  Activity in posterior parietal cortex mediates the visual dominance over kinesthesia , 2007, Neuroscience Research.

[4]  Marjolein P. M. Kammers,et al.  What is embodiment? A psychometric approach , 2008, Cognition.

[5]  Nicholas P. Holmes,et al.  Visual bias of unseen hand position with a mirror: spatial and temporal factors , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  M. Nicholls,et al.  The third hand: Ownership of a rubber hand in addition to the existing (phantom) hand , 2011, Cortex.

[7]  Marjolein P. M. Kammers,et al.  The rubber hand illusion in action , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  N. Bolognini,et al.  Enhancement of visual perception by crossmodal visuo-auditory interaction , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  R. P. Power The Dominance of Touch by Vision: Sometimes Incomplete , 1980, Perception.

[10]  Massimiliano Di Luca,et al.  The Rubber Hand Illusion: Feeling of Ownership and Proprioceptive Drift Do Not Go Hand in Hand , 2011, PloS one.

[11]  D. Wolpert,et al.  When Feeling Is More Important Than Seeing in Sensorimotor Adaptation , 2002, Current Biology.

[12]  Anne C. Sittig,et al.  The precision of proprioceptive position sense , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  Alexandre Pouget,et al.  Bayesian multisensory integration and cross-modal spatial links , 2004, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[14]  Cristiana Cavina-Pratesi,et al.  Redundant target effect and intersensory facilitation from visual-tactile interactions in simple reaction time , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Over my fake body: body ownership illusions for studying the multisensory basis of own-body perception , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[16]  Gregory C. DeAngelis,et al.  Bridging the gap between theories of sensory cue integration and the physiology of multisensory neurons , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[17]  L Mitrani,et al.  Model of visual localization. , 1993, Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis.

[18]  P. Haggard,et al.  The rubber hand illusion revisited: visuotactile integration and self-attribution. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  Albert Jin Chung,et al.  Perception of Body Ownership Is Driven by Bayesian Sensory Inference , 2015, PloS one.

[20]  Patrick Haggard,et al.  Visuo-tactile Integration in Personal Space , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  T. Stanford,et al.  Multisensory integration: current issues from the perspective of the single neuron , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  H. Pick,et al.  Visual capture produced by prism spectacles , 1965 .

[23]  M S Graziano,et al.  Coding the locations of objects in the dark. , 1997, Science.

[24]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Timecourse of coactivation in bimodal divided attention , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  Carsten Mehring,et al.  Ownership and Agency of an Independent Supernumerary Hand Induced by an Imitation Brain-Computer Interface , 2015, PloS one.

[26]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Short-term Effects of the ‘Rubber Hand’ Illusion on Aspects of Visual Neglect , 2007, Neurocase.

[27]  Dieter Kleinböhl,et al.  Action and perception in the rubber hand illusion , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  D. H. Warren,et al.  Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. , 1980, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  I ROCK,et al.  Vision and Touch: An Experimentally Created Conflict between the Two Senses , 1964, Science.

[30]  Herta Flor,et al.  Perceptual drifts of real and artificial limbs in the rubber hand illusion , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[31]  Olaf Blanke,et al.  Visual consciousness and bodily self-consciousness. , 2015, Current opinion in neurology.

[32]  H. Ehrsson,et al.  How Many Arms Make a Pair? Perceptual Illusion of Having an Additional Limb , 2009, Perception.

[33]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see , 1998, Nature.

[34]  Daniel Zeller,et al.  Impairment of the rubber hand illusion in focal hand dystonia. , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[35]  M. Tsakiris My body in the brain: A neurocognitive model of body-ownership , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  R M Mulligan,et al.  Multimodal signal detection: Independent decisions vs. integration , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  F. Vignemont Embodiment, ownership and disownership , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.

[38]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.