Comparative Bioavailability of Two Oral L-Thyroxine Formulations after Multiple Dose Administration in Patients with Hypothyroidism and its Relation with Therapeutic Endpoints and Dissolution Profiles

Summary The aim of the present study was to evaluate the bioequivalence and thera peutic equivalence of the two most com monly prescribed L thyroxine (monso dium L thyroxine hydrate, CAS 25416-65-3) formulations in Brazil in patients treated for hypothyroidism. Twenty four patients received 100 µg L thyroxine daily of either Puran T4® (test) or the Brazilian reference formulation (refer ence) during 42 days, in a two period crossover design. Serum samples ob tained over a 24 h interval were analyzed for their total T4 concentration by a chemiluminescent immunoassay. Con tent and uniformity of the tablets and dis solution studies were also assessed ac cording to USP 24 monograph using an isocratic HPLC UV system and a rotating-paddle method. The mean pharmaco-kinetic parameters for total T4, expressed as geometric means (CV), for the test and reference were, respectively: Cmax (µg/dl) 9.8 (14.3 %) and 10.8 (14.9 %); AUC0–24 h (µg/dl · h) 206.8 (13.9 %) and 230.4 (14.9 %). Median values (90 % CI) for Tmax (h) were 3 (2–3) and 2 (2–4) for the test and reference, respectively. 90 % CI for ratios of LogCmax and LogAUC0–24h were 86.6–94.9 and 86.3–93.4, respectively. Although the test exhibited values of Cmax and AUC0–24 h around 10 % lower than the reference, these formulations must be considered bioequivalent since the 90 % CI for both Cmax and AUC0–24h mean ratio were within the 80–125 % interval as proposed by the US Food and Drug Administration and the Brazilian legislation. TSH dosages within the normal range further support therapeutic equivalence between the two formulations. Dissolution data were roughly in agreement with in vivo results since both formulations comply with the USP dissolution criteria although the test tablets had a slower dissolution rate than the reference tablets. As a conclusion, the two oral formulations of L-thyroxine are both bioequivalent and therapeutically equivalent although presenting a small difference in their extent of absorption. Noteworthy, the dissolution profiles of the tablets correlate well with their bioavailability in the present experimental conditions.

[1]  A. Toft Thyroid hormone replacement--one hormone or two? , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  A. Prange,et al.  Effects of thyroxine as compared with thyroxine plus triiodothyronine in patients with hypothyroidism. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  F. Tinahones,et al.  Altered bioavailability due to changes in the formulation of a commercial preparation of levothyroxine in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma , 1997, Clinical endocrinology.

[4]  Walter W. Hauck,et al.  Bioequivalence of generic and brand-name levothyroxine products in the treatment of hypothyroidism. , 1997, JAMA.

[5]  P. Copeland Two Cases of Therapeutic Failure Associated with Levothyroxine Brand Interchange , 1995, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.

[6]  P. Ladenson,et al.  Treatment guidelines for patients with hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism. Standards of Care Committee, American Thyroid Association. , 1995, JAMA.

[7]  S. Mandel,et al.  Levothyroxine Therapy in Patients with Thyroid Disease , 1993, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[8]  J. Franklyn,et al.  Prevalence and follow‐up of abnormal thyrotrophin (TSH) concentrations in the elderly in the United Kingdom , 1991, Clinical endocrinology.

[9]  M. Helfand,et al.  Monitoring therapy in patients taking levothyroxine. , 1990, Annals of internal medicine.

[10]  R. Blouin,et al.  Biopharmaceutical comparison of two levothyroxine sodium products. , 1989, Clinical pharmacy.

[11]  W. Castelli,et al.  The aging thyroid. Thyroid deficiency in the Framingham Study. , 1985, Archives of internal medicine.

[12]  J. Hennessey,et al.  The equivalency of two L-thyroxine preparations. , 1985, Annals of internal medicine.

[13]  M. Surks,et al.  Oral thyroxine: variation in biologic action and tablet content. , 1984, Annals of internal medicine.

[14]  S. Stoffer,et al.  Potency of levothyroxine products. , 1984, JAMA.

[15]  R. Young,et al.  In vivo comparison of levothyroxine preparations. , 1982, JAMA.

[16]  S. Stoffer,et al.  Potency of Brand Name and Generic Levothyroxine Products , 1980 .

[17]  J. Jones,et al.  Standards for levothyroxine preparations. , 1980, JAMA.

[18]  P. Larsen,et al.  Hormonal content of thyroid replacement preparations. , 1980, JAMA.

[19]  M. Hays,et al.  Absorption of oral thyroxine. , 1995, Drug and therapeutics bulletin.