Quantifying the effect of habitat availability on species distributions.

1. If animals moved randomly in space, the use of different habitats would be proportional to their availability. Hence, deviations from proportionality between use and availability are considered the tell-tale sign of preference. This principle forms the basis for most habitat selection and species distribution models fitted to use-availability or count data (e.g. MaxEnt and Resource Selection Functions). 2. Yet, once an essential habitat type is sufficiently abundant to meet an individual's needs, increased availability of this habitat type may lead to a decrease in the use/availability ratio. Accordingly, habitat selection functions may estimate negative coefficients when habitats are superabundant, incorrectly suggesting an apparent avoidance. Furthermore, not accounting for the effects of availability on habitat use may lead to poor predictions, particularly when applied to habitats that differ considerably from those for which data have been collected. 3. Using simulations, we show that habitat use varies non-linearly with habitat availability, even when individuals follow simple movement rules to acquire food and avoid risk. The results show that the impact of availability strongly depends on the type of habitat (e.g. whether it is essential or substitutable) and how it interacts with the distribution and availability of other habitats. 4. We demonstrate the utility of a variety of existing and new methods that enable the influence of habitat availability to be explicitly estimated. Models that allow for non-linear effects (using b-spline smoothers) and interactions between environmental covariates defining habitats and measures of their availability were best able to capture simulated patterns of habitat use across a range of environments. 5. An appealing aspect of some of the methods we discuss is that the relative influence of availability is not defined a priori, but directly estimated by the model. This feature is likely to improve model prediction, hint at the mechanism of habitat selection, and may signpost habitats that are critical for the organism's fitness.

[1]  Noel A. C. Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data: Cressie/Statistics , 1993 .

[2]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[3]  Jason Matthiopoulos Model-supervised kernel smoothing for the estimation of spatial usage , 2003 .

[4]  M. Boyce,et al.  Evaluating resource selection functions , 2002 .

[5]  Seymour Geisser,et al.  8. Predictive Inference: An Introduction , 1995 .

[6]  D. MacKenzie Occupancy Estimation and Modeling: Inferring Patterns and Dynamics of Species Occurrence , 2005 .

[7]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Sampling in ecology and evolution – bridging the gap between theory and practice , 2010 .

[8]  Daniel Fortin,et al.  Inference from habitat-selection analysis depends on foraging strategies. , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[9]  Robert P. Anderson,et al.  Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions , 2006 .

[10]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology , 2000 .

[11]  Devin S Johnson,et al.  A General Framework for the Analysis of Animal Resource Selection from Telemetry Data , 2008, Biometrics.

[12]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Generalized Additive Models , 1991 .

[13]  O. Olsson,et al.  Predicting the distribution of a suitable habitat for the white stork in Southern Sweden: identifying priority areas for reintroduction and habitat restoration , 2009 .

[14]  N. Fisher,et al.  Spatial logistic regression and change-of-support in Poisson point processes , 2010 .

[15]  Mike Rees,et al.  5. Statistics for Spatial Data , 1993 .

[16]  Thomas Kneib,et al.  A general approach to the analysis of habitat selection , 2009, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[17]  P. Hammond,et al.  Using habitat models to identify suitable sites for marine protected areas for harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) , 2010 .

[18]  H. Rue,et al.  Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations , 2009 .

[19]  Avishek Chakraborty,et al.  Point pattern modelling for degraded presence‐only data over large regions , 2011 .

[20]  Bryan F. J. Manly,et al.  Assessing habitat selection when availability changes , 1996 .

[21]  Paul R Moorcroft,et al.  Mechanistic home range models and resource selection analysis: a reconciliation and unification. , 2006, Ecology.

[22]  Atle Mysterud,et al.  FUNCTIONAL RESPONSES IN HABITAT USE: AVAILABILITY INFLUENCES RELATIVE USE IN TRADE-OFF SITUATIONS , 1998 .

[23]  D. Warton,et al.  Equivalence of MAXENT and Poisson Point Process Models for Species Distribution Modeling in Ecology , 2013, Biometrics.

[24]  Andrew E. Derocher,et al.  Functional responses in polar bear habitat selection , 2003 .

[25]  G. Caughley,et al.  Wildlife Ecology, Conservation and Management , 2006 .

[26]  M. Boyce,et al.  Relating populations to habitats using resource selection functions. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  D. Warton,et al.  Correction note: Poisson point process models solve the “pseudo-absence problem” for presence-only data in ecology , 2010, 1011.3319.

[28]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[29]  A. Páez,et al.  A General Framework for Estimation and Inference of Geographically Weighted Regression Models: 1. Location-Specific Kernel Bandwidths and a Test for Locational Heterogeneity , 2002 .

[30]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Are niche-based species distribution models transferable in space? , 2006 .

[31]  N. Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data. , 1992 .

[32]  Chris J. Johnson,et al.  Resource Selection Functions Based on Use–Availability Data: Theoretical Motivation and Evaluation Methods , 2006 .

[33]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[34]  Bryan F. J. Manly,et al.  The Use of Discrete-Choice Models for Evaluating Resource Selection , 1998 .

[35]  Daniel Fortin,et al.  Multi-level functional responses for wildlife conservation: the case of threatened caribou in managed boreal forests , 2012 .

[36]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Habitat–performance relationships: finding the right metric at a given spatial scale , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  Bernie J. McConnell,et al.  Estimating space‐use and habitat preference from wildlife telemetry data , 2008 .

[38]  J. Fieberg,et al.  Comparative interpretation of count, presence–absence and point methods for species distribution models , 2012 .

[39]  Jon S. Horne,et al.  Likelihood Cross-Validation Versus Least Squares Cross-Validation for Choosing the Smoothing Parameter in Kernel Home-Range Analysis , 2006 .

[40]  Jason Matthiopoulos,et al.  Generalized functional responses for species distributions. , 2011, Ecology.

[41]  Subhash R Lele,et al.  Weighted distributions and estimation of resource selection probability functions. , 2006, Ecology.

[42]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Practical Maximum Pseudolikelihood for Spatial Point Patterns , 1998, Advances in Applied Probability.

[43]  B. Manly,et al.  Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. , 1994 .

[44]  James O. Ramsay,et al.  Functional Data Analysis , 2005 .

[45]  Dennis M. Heisey,et al.  Analyzing Selection Experiments with Log-Linear Models , 1985 .

[46]  HighWire Press Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 1781, The London Medical Journal.

[47]  C. R. Rao,et al.  Weighted distributions and size-biased sampling with applications to wildlife populations and human families , 1978 .

[48]  Bryan F. J. Manly,et al.  Resource Selection by Animals , 1993, Springer Netherlands.

[49]  Paul J Rathouz,et al.  Accounting for animal movement in estimation of resource selection functions: sampling and data analysis. , 2009, Ecology.

[50]  Jason Matthiopoulos,et al.  The interpretation of habitat preference metrics under use–availability designs , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[51]  David A. Elston,et al.  Empirical models for the spatial distribution of wildlife , 1993 .

[52]  D. Tilman A Consumer-Resource Approach to Community Structure , 1986 .