The blinking spotlight of attention

Increasing evidence suggests that attention can concurrently select multiple locations; yet it is not clear whether this ability relies on continuous allocation of attention to the different targets (a “parallel” strategy) or whether attention switches rapidly between the targets (a periodic “sampling” strategy). Here, we propose a method to distinguish between these two alternatives. The human psychometric function for detection of a single target as a function of its duration can be used to predict the corresponding function for two or more attended targets. Importantly, the predicted curves differ, depending on whether a parallel or sampling strategy is assumed. For a challenging detection task, we found that human performance was best reflected by a sampling model, indicating that multiple items of interest were processed in series at a rate of approximately seven items per second. Surprisingly, the data suggested that attention operated in this periodic regime, even when it was focused on a single target. That is, attention might rely on an intrinsically periodic process.

[1]  D. LaBerge Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Allocation of attention in the visual field. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  D. Long I of the Vortex: From Neurons to Self , 2002 .

[4]  A. Pérez-Villalba Rhythms of the Brain, G. Buzsáki. Oxford University Press, Madison Avenue, New York (2006), Price: GB £42.00, p. 448, ISBN: 0-19-530106-4 , 2008 .

[5]  John K. Tsotsos Analyzing vision at the complexity level , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[6]  D. Somers,et al.  Processing Efficiency of Divided Spatial Attention Mechanisms in Human Visual Cortex , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Multiple object tracking and attentional processing. , 2000, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[8]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  Visual selection mediated by location: Feature-based selection of noncontiguous locations , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  E. Miyashita,et al.  Gamma-band oscillations in the “barrel cortex” precede rat's exploratory whisking , 1999, Neuroscience.

[10]  M. Eckstein The Lower Visual Search Efficiency for Conjunctions Is Due to Noise and not Serial Attentional Processing , 1998 .

[11]  Adam Kepecs,et al.  Seeing at a glance, smelling in a whiff: rapid forms of perceptual decision making , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[12]  A. Kramer,et al.  Splitting the Beam: Distribution of Attention Over Noncontiguous Regions of the Visual Field , 1995 .

[13]  R. Desimone,et al.  Modulation of Oscillatory Neuronal Synchronization by Selective Visual Attention , 2001, Science.

[14]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Correlated neuronal activity and the flow of neural information , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  G. Boynton,et al.  Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  Nathaniel B Sawtell,et al.  From sparks to spikes: information processing in the electrosensory systems of fish , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[17]  Preeti Verghese,et al.  The psychophysics of visual search , 2000, Vision Research.

[18]  M. Carrasco,et al.  The contribution of covert attention to the set-size and eccentricity effects in visual search. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  S. Thorpe,et al.  Spike times make sense , 2005, Trends in Neurosciences.

[20]  J. Townsend Serial vs. Parallel Processing: Sometimes They Look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and Should) be Distinguished , 1990 .

[21]  Andreas T. Schaefer,et al.  Theta oscillation coupled spike latencies yield computational vigour in a mammalian sensory system , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[23]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Independent Resources for Attentional Tracking in the Left and Right Visual Hemifields , 2005, Psychological science.

[25]  J. Hyönä,et al.  Is multiple object tracking carried out automatically by an early vision mechanism independent of higher‐order cognition? An individual difference approach , 2004 .

[26]  C. Koch,et al.  The Continuous Wagon Wheel Illusion Is Associated with Changes in Electroencephalogram Power at ∼13 Hz , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  D. Wilkin,et al.  Neuron , 2001, Brain Research.

[28]  D. Somers,et al.  Multiple Spotlights of Attentional Selection in Human Visual Cortex , 2004, Neuron.

[29]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  R. Desimone,et al.  Responses of Neurons in Inferior Temporal Cortex during Memory- Guided Visual Search , 1998 .

[31]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex , 1999, Nature.

[32]  J. Palmer Attention in Visual Search: Distinguishing Four Causes of a Set-Size Effect , 1995 .

[33]  S. A. Hillyard,et al.  Sustained division of the attentional spotlight , 2003, Nature.

[34]  R. Llinás I of the Vortex: From Neurons to Self , 2000 .

[35]  M. Carrasco,et al.  The temporal dynamics of visual search: evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  F. Crick Function of the thalamic reticular complex: the searchlight hypothesis. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[38]  H. Pashler,et al.  Evidence for split attentional foci. , 2000, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[39]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[40]  C. Koch,et al.  Attention-driven discrete sampling of motion perception. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[42]  Glenn C. Turner,et al.  Oscillations and Sparsening of Odor Representations in the Mushroom Body , 2002, Science.