Use of data from multiple registries in studying biologic discontinuation: challenges and opportunities.

Many studies have been conducted concerning discontinuation of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD), but mainly in trial settings which result in limited generalisability. Registry studies can complement the current literature of biologic DMARD discontinuation by providing more generalisable information. However, it may be necessary to combine registries to increase power and provide more diverse patient populations. This increased power could provide us information about risk and benefits of discontinuing biologic DMARD in typical clinical practice. However, use of multiple registries is not without challenges. In this review, we discuss the challenges to combining data across multiple registries, focusing on biologic discontinuation as an example. Challenges include: 1) generalizability of each registry; 2) new versus prevalent users designs; 3) outcome definitions; 4) different health care systems; 5) different follow up intervals; and 6) data harmonisation. The first three apply to each registry, and the last three apply to combining multiple registries. This review describes these challenges, corresponding solutions, and potential future opportunities.

[1]  M. Weinblatt,et al.  Biologic discontinuation studies: a systematic review of methods , 2013, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[2]  Y. Saeki,et al.  Drug free REmission/low disease activity after cessation of tocilizumab (Actemra) Monotherapy (DREAM) study , 2013, Modern rheumatology.

[3]  A. Boonen,et al.  Inequities in access to biologic and synthetic DMARDs across 46 European countries , 2013, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[4]  H. Yamanaka,et al.  Safety and effectiveness of adalimumab in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients: Postmarketing surveillance report of 7740 patients , 2012, Modern rheumatology.

[5]  Seoyoung C. Kim,et al.  Changes in Use of Disease‐Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs for Rheumatoid Arthritis in the United States During 1983–2009 , 2013, Arthritis care & research.

[6]  K. Pavelka,et al.  Biologic registries in rheumatology: lessons learned and expectations for the future. , 2012, Autoimmunity reviews.

[7]  H. Yamanaka,et al.  Safety and effectiveness of adalimumab in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients: postmarketing surveillance report of the first 3,000 patients , 2012, Modern rheumatology.

[8]  A. Vignoli,et al.  Rett networked database: An integrated clinical and genetic network of rett syndrome databases , 2012, Human mutation.

[9]  S. Bang,et al.  Korean Observational Study Network for Arthritis (KORONA): establishment of a prospective multicenter cohort for rheumatoid arthritis in South Korea. , 2012, Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism.

[10]  J. Smolen,et al.  Definition of treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis based on the simplified and the clinical disease activity index , 2012, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[11]  P. V. van Riel,et al.  Effectiveness of disease-modifying antirheumatic drug co-therapy with methotrexate and leflunomide in rituximab-treated rheumatoid arthritis patients: results of a 1-year follow-up study from the CERERRA collaboration , 2011, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[12]  H. Yamanaka,et al.  Postmarketing surveillance of tocilizumab for rheumatoid arthritis in Japan: interim analysis of 3881 patients , 2011, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[13]  Parminder Raina,et al.  Invited commentary: consolidating data harmonization--how to obtain quality and applicability? , 2011, American journal of epidemiology.

[14]  M. Weinblatt,et al.  Pain persists in DAS28 rheumatoid arthritis remission but not in ACR/EULAR remission: a longitudinal observational study , 2011, Arthritis research & therapy.

[15]  J. Douwes,et al.  AGRICOH: A Consortium of Agricultural Cohorts , 2011, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[16]  E. Nasonov,et al.  Access to biologic treatment for rheumatoid arthritis in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries , 2011, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[17]  H. Yamanaka,et al.  Postmarketing surveillance of safety and effectiveness of etanercept in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis , 2011, Modern rheumatology.

[18]  Jing Cui,et al.  Using genetic and clinical data to understand response to disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug therapy: data from the Brigham and Women's Hospital Rheumatoid Arthritis Sequential Study. , 2011, Rheumatology.

[19]  N. Dreyer,et al.  Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide , 2010 .

[20]  N. Nishimoto,et al.  Assessment of the validity of the 28-joint disease activity score using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) as a disease activity index of rheumatoid arthritis in the efficacy evaluation of 24-week treatment with tocilizumab: subanalysis of the SATORI study , 2010, Modern rheumatology.

[21]  B. Bresnihan,et al.  Disparities in rheumatoid arthritis disease activity according to gross domestic product in 25 countries in the QUEST–RA database , 2009, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[22]  Kevin B. Johnson,et al.  Categorizing the world of registries , 2008, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[23]  J. Kremer,et al.  The role of drug and disease registries in rheumatic disease epidemiology , 2008, Current opinion in rheumatology.

[24]  H. Yamanaka,et al.  Postmarketing surveillance of the safety profile of infliximab in 5000 Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis , 2007, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[25]  H. Yamanaka,et al.  Comparison of Disease Activity Score (DAS)28- erythrocyte sedimentation rate and DAS28- C-reactive protein threshold values , 2006, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[26]  H. Yamanaka,et al.  Potential impact of observational cohort studies in Japan on rheumatoid arthritis research and practice , 2006, Modern rheumatology.

[27]  J. Kremer The CORRONA database , 2005, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[28]  Gary H Lyman,et al.  The strengths and limitations of meta-analyses based on aggregate data , 2005, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[29]  J. Ware,et al.  Applied Longitudinal Analysis , 2004 .

[30]  W. Ray,et al.  Evaluating medication effects outside of clinical trials: new-user designs. , 2003, American journal of epidemiology.

[31]  A. Silman,et al.  British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register , 2003, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[32]  T. Pincus Limitations of randomized clinical trials in chronic diseases: explanations and recommendations. , 2002, Advances in mind-body medicine.

[33]  T. Pincus,et al.  Why randomized controlled clinical trials do not depict accurately long-term outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis: some explanations and suggestions for future studies. , 1997, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[34]  L. Moses The series of consecutive cases as a device for assessing outcomes of intervention. , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[35]  Rupert G. Miller,et al.  Survival Analysis , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.