Systematic Evaluation of Current Possibilities to Determine Left Ventricular Volumes by Echocardiography in Patients after Myocardial Infarction

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy for quantification of left ventricular (LV) volumes and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) with current echocardiographic methods of planimetry for analysis of LV remodeling after myocardial infarction in daily clinical routine. Methods: 26 patients were investigated directly after interventional therapy at hospital pre-discharge and at 6 month follow-up. Standardized 2D transthoracic native and contrast echocardiography were performed in all patients. Due to methodological aspects the results of LV volumes and LVEF using native echocardiography were compared to the results of LV opacification (LVO) imaging for analysis in mono-, bi- and triplane data sets using the Simpson’s rule. In addition corresponding multidimensional data sets were analyzed. Results: The assessment of LV volumes and LVEF is more accurate with contrast echocardiography. The comparison of LV volumes and LVEF shows significant increases using contrast echocardiography (p < 0.001). Larger left ventricular end-diastolic volumes (LVEDV) are measured at follow up (p < 0.05). Significant differences (p < 0.001) are found for the determination of LVEDV and LVEF relating to apical mono-, bi-, tri- and multiplane data sets. Standard deviations of the triplane approach, however, are significantly lower than using other modalities. Conclusion: Depending on the localization of the myocardial infarction LV volumes and LVEF are less reliably evaluated using the mono- or biplane approach. According to standardization and simultaneous acquisition of all LV wall segments the triplane approach is currently the best approach to determine LV systolic function. In addition, contrast echocardiography is indicated to improve endocardial border delineation in patients using the triplane or multiplane approach. To our knowledge the present study is the first systematic evaluation of all current possibilities for determination of LV volumes and LVEF by native and contrast echocardiography.

[1]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Universal definition of myocardial infarction. , 2007 .

[2]  J. Cohn,et al.  Severity of left ventricular remodeling defines outcomes and response to therapy in heart failure: Valsartan heart failure trial (Val-HeFT) echocardiographic data. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  Hugo A. Katus,et al.  Myocardial infarction redefined--a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. , 2000, European heart journal.

[4]  Denisa Muraru,et al.  Validation of a novel automated border-detection algorithm for rapid and accurate quantitation of left ventricular volumes based on three-dimensional echocardiography. , 2010, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.

[5]  P. Nihoyannopoulos,et al.  The clinical applications of contrast echocardiography. , 2007, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.

[6]  J S Alpert,et al.  Myocardial infarction redefined--a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  A. Magalski,et al.  Contrast administration reduces interobserver variability in determination of left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and good baseline endocardial border delineation. , 2006, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  A. Hagendorff Transthoracic echocardiography in adult patients--a proposal for documenting a standardized investigation. , 2008, Ultraschall in der Medizin.

[9]  L. Sugeng,et al.  Real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography: an integral component of the routine echocardiographic examination in adult patients? , 2009, Circulation.

[10]  G. Tonti,et al.  Quantification methods in contrast echocardiography. , 2005, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.

[11]  R. Kloner,et al.  Left ventricular remodeling in the post-infarction heart: a review of cellular, molecular mechanisms, and therapeutic modalities , 2010, Heart Failure Reviews.

[12]  William Stewart,et al.  Recommendations for chamber quantification. , 2006, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.

[13]  J. Bosch,et al.  Automated border detection in three-dimensional echocardiography: principles and promises. , 2010, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.

[14]  C. Visser,et al.  Early identification of left ventricular remodelling after myocardial infarction, assessed by transthoracic 3D echocardiography. , 2004, European heart journal.

[15]  F. T. ten Cate,et al.  Assessment of systolic left ventricular function: a multi-centre comparison of cineventriculography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, unenhanced and contrast-enhanced echocardiography. , 2005, European Heart Journal.

[16]  John G F Cleland,et al.  New generation 3-dimensional echocardiography for left ventricular volumetric and functional measurements: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance. , 2006, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.

[17]  Mark J Monaghan,et al.  Role of real time 3D echocardiography in evaluating the left ventricle , 2005, Heart.