Traits of benthic macroinvertebrates in semi‐natural French streams: an initial application to biomonitoring in Europe

1. The methods used to indicate the biological state of streams are often based on taxonomic composition, and the abundance of species or other taxa. This 'taxonomic structure' varies among ecoregions and cannot be applied to wider geographical areas. Therefore, we assessed the species traits of benthic macroinvertebrates from semi-natural reference sites as a potential benchmark for large-scale biomonitoring. Our purpose was to assess the stability of community structure, based on the representation of taxa and of traits, across large gradients of geology (sedimentary to granitic), altitude (65-1982 m), geographical coordinates (0° 48' W to 7° 20' E and 42° 52' to 48° 44' N), stream order (1-5) and slope (0.5-60‰). 2. We used invertebrate abundance data from the 62 most natural French stream sites available. These abundance data served to weight the occurrence of 'biological' traits, such as reproductive characteristics, mobility, resistance forms, food, feeding habits, respiration, and 'ecological' traits, such as preferences for temperature, trophic level, saprobity, biogeographic distribution, longitudinal zonation, substratum and current velocity. 3. Multivariate analyses of taxonomic composition demonstrated a clear site gradient from lowlands to uplands and from calcareous to granitic geology. In contrast, community structure based on both biological and ecological traits was stable across environmental gradients. 4. The frequency distribution of biological traits indicated that the stream benthos of the 'reference sites' had a mixture of categories which confirmed theoretical predictions for temporally stable and spatially variable habitats. A mixture of ecological trait categories also occurred at our reference sites. Thus, semi-natural benthic macroinvertebrate communities are functionally diverse. Moreover, we included an initial application of these traits to a case of slightly to moderately polluted sites to show that the impact of humans significantly changes this natural functional diversity. 5. Future studies should focus on the potential for various biological and ecological traits to discriminate different human impacts on the benthic macroinvertebrates of running waters, and on the integration of this functional application into a general 'reference-condition' approach.

[1]  Eric R. Pianka,et al.  On r- and K-Selection , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[2]  Anne Kosmala.  Evaluation écotoxicologique de l'impact des effluents de stations d'épuration sur les cours d'eau : intérêt d'une approche intégrée , 1998 .

[3]  Judith Meyer,et al.  Benthic macroinvertebrate community structure, function and production with respect to habitat type, reach and drainage basin in the southern Appalachians (U.S.A.) , 1995 .

[4]  Focusing environmental management budgets on non‐linear system responses: potential for significant improvements to freshwater ecosystems , 1997 .

[5]  Jean Thioulouse,et al.  ADE-4: a multivariate analysis and graphical display software , 1997, Stat. Comput..

[6]  T. Mihuc.  The functional trophic role of lotic primary consumers: generalist versus specialist strategies , 1997 .

[7]  A. Huryn,et al.  Local Geomorphology as a Determinant of Macrofaunal Production in a Mountain Stream. , 1987, Ecology.

[8]  S. Stearns.  THE EVOLUTION OF LIFE * : . 4120 HISTORY TRAITS : A Critique of the Theory and a Review of the Data , 2008 .

[9]  Rick Gunn,et al.  Macroinvertebrate frequency data for the RIVPACS III sites in Great Britain and their use in conservation evaluation , 1996 .

[10]  T. R. E. Southwood,et al.  Tactics, strategies and templets* , 1988 .

[11]  Eric R. Pianka,et al.  r and K Selection or b and d Selection? , 1972, The American Naturalist.

[12]  B. Statzner,et al.  Theoretical habitat templets, species traits, and species richness: 548 plant and animal species in the Upper Rhône River and its floodplain , 1994 .

[13]  M. Bournaud,et al.  Macroinvertebrate Community Structure and Environmental Characteristics along a Large River: Congruity of Patterns for Identification to Species or Family , 1996, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[14]  R. Horwitz.  Temporal Variability Patterns and the Distributional Patterns of Stream Fishes , 1978 .

[15]  M. Parsons,et al.  The effect of habitat‐specific sampling on biological assessment of water quality using a predictive model , 1996 .

[16]  B. Statzner,et al.  Biomonitoring through biological traits of benthic macroinvertebrates : perspectives for a general tool in stream management , 1998 .

[17]  C. Townsend,et al.  Species traits in relation to a habitat templet for river systems , 1994 .

[18]  Robert C. Bailey,et al.  Biological guidelines for freshwater sediment based on BEnthic Assessment of SedimenT (the BEAST) using a multivariate approach for predicting biological state , 1995 .

[19]  S. Stearns.  Life-History Tactics: A Review of the Ideas , 1976, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[20]  P. Usseglio-Polatera,et al.  Theoretical habitat templets, species traits, and species richness: Plecoptera and Ephemeroptera in the Upper Rhône River and its floodplain , 1994 .

[21]  A. N. Strahler.  Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology , 1957 .

[22]  G. Minshall,et al.  The River Continuum Concept , 1980 .

[23]  R. Bailey,et al.  Does taxonomic resolution affect the multivariate description of the structure of freshwater benthic macroinvertebrate communities , 1997 .

[24]  P. Richoux.  Theoretical habitat templets, species traits, and species richness: aquatic Coleoptera in the Upper Rhône River and its floodplain , 1994 .

[25]  B. Faessel,et al.  Incidence de rejets ponctuels et diffus sur les communautés d'invertébrés benthiques d'un cours d'eau du Beaujolais : l'Ardières , 1993 .

[26]  P. Usseglio-Polatera,et al.  Theoretical habitat templets, species traits, and species richness: Trichoptera in the Upper Rhône River and its floodplain , 1994 .

[27]  T. R. E. Southwood,et al.  HABITAT, THE TEMPLET FOR ECOLOGICAL STRATEGIES? , 1977 .

[28]  S. Charvet,et al.  Impact assessment of a wastewater treatment plant effluent using instream invertebrates and the Ceriodaphnia dubia chronictoxicity test , 1999 .

[29]  B. Statzner,et al.  The synthesis of long-term ecological research in the context of concurrently developed ecological theory: design of a research strategy for the Upper Rhône River and its floodplain , 1994 .

[30]  T. Angradi,et al.  Inter-Habitat Variation in Benthic Community Structure, Function, and Organic Matter Storage in 3 Appalachian Headwater Streams , 1996, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[31]  P. Usseglio-Polatera.  Theoretical habitat templets, species traits, and species richness: aquatic insects in the Upper Rhône River and its floodplain , 1994 .

[32]  V. Resh,et al.  Water quality monitoring and aquatic organisms: the importance of species identification. , 1975, Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation.

[33]  Daniel Chessel,et al.  A fuzzy coding approach for the analysis of long‐term ecological data , 1994 .

[34]  M. Hill,et al.  Reciprocal Averaging : an eigenvector method of ordination , 1973 .

[35]  B. Statzner,et al.  Potential contribution of system‐specific knowledge (SSK) to stream‐management decisions: ecological and economic aspects , 1993 .

[36]  P. Usseglio-Polatera,et al.  An approach to the synthesis of qualitative ecological information from aquatic Coleoptera communities , 1992 .

[37]  T. Reynoldson,et al.  The Reference Condition: A Comparison of Multimetric and Multivariate Approaches to Assess Water-Quality Impairment Using Benthic Macroinvertebrates , 1997, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.