The Economics of Spectrum Management: A Review

Purpose – The objective of the paper is (i) to characterise spectrum as an economic resource and (ii) to use this knowledge to review spectrum management approaches and their economic justification in theory and practice. In particular, it aims at identifying credible alternatives to the three most debated policy options (command and control, property rights and commons). Design/Methodology/Approach – The article takes stock of numerous contributions made available through peer-reviewed academic research, agency (or agency-commissioned) reports, think-tank and industry-sponsored policy papers, online articles and conference papers. This overview permits us to contrast the main spectrum management regimes used in practice with those currently experimented or formulated at a conceptual level (a past/present/future perspective). Findings – Spectrum policy reforms have been the subject of a controversy over the respective merits of two modes of spectrum controls liberalisation: property rights and commons. Ambiguities about what constitutes a socially efficient spectrum management regime emerge from the polarisation of the debate and the conceptual approaches taken by the literature. Empirical research would help unlock the stalemate, but is currently difficult to conduct given limited policy experimentation. If deregulation remains debated conceptually, policy making would benefit from a larger array of spectrum management options than the binary policy choices currently examined. Research Limitations/Implications – The review does not seek to address detailed technical issues, or issues that are specific to particular frequency bands. The emphasis is on the economic interpretation of efficiency and scarcity rather than on technical or functional interpretations. Research Gap – The spectrum management literature has hitherto only been partially reviewed, with much focus on three existing modes of spectrum management but very little on potential alternative approaches, which are important to resolve policy ambiguities. Originality/Value – The multidisciplinary aspect of spectrum management research (economic, legal, engineering, and philosophic) has polarised the policy debate in terms of markets vs. commons, social capital vs. property, freedom vs. regulation, etc. The main contribution of this review is to string these approaches together and lay some foundations for a general theory of spectrum management.

[1]  Joseph Mitola,et al.  Cognitive radio: making software radios more personal , 1999, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[2]  Milton L. Mueller New Zealand's revolution in spectrum management , 1993 .

[3]  Stuart Minor Benjamin Spectrum Abundance and the Choice Between Private and Public Control , 2003 .

[4]  Eli M. Noam,et al.  Taking the next step beyond spectrum auctions: open spectrum access , 1995, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[5]  George A. Akerlof,et al.  The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism , 1970 .

[6]  David P. Reed,et al.  How wireless networks scale: the illusion of spectrum scarcity , 2002 .

[7]  J. Bauer A Comparative Analysis of Spectrum Management Regimes , 2003 .

[8]  Robert W. Crandall New Zealand Spectrum Policy: A Model for the United States?* , 1998, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[9]  Gerald R. Faulhaber The Question of Spectrum: Technology, Management, and Regime Change , 2005, J. Telecommun. High Technol. Law.

[10]  Stuart Buck,et al.  Replacing Spectrum Auctions with a Spectrum Commons , 2001 .

[11]  J. W. Burns,et al.  Measuring spectrum efficiency - the art of spectrum utilisation metrics , 2002 .

[12]  Stuart Minor Benjamin The Logic of Scarcity: Idle Spectrum as a First Amendment Violation , 2002 .

[13]  L. White,et al.  "Propertyzing" the Electromagnetic Spectrum: Why it's Important, and How to Begin , 2000 .

[14]  Morten Falch,et al.  Economic versus technical approaches to frequency management , 2004 .

[15]  David Grandblaise,et al.  Cognitive Radio, Spectrum and Radio Resource Management , 2004 .

[16]  Gregory L. Rosston The long and winding road: the FCC paves the path with good intentions , 2003 .

[17]  Thomas W. Hazlett,et al.  The Rationality of U.S. Regulation of the Broadcast Spectrum in the 1934 Communications Act , 1990, Review of Industrial Organization.

[18]  Peter W. Huber,et al.  Administrative Creation of Property Rights to Radio Spectrum* , 1998, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[19]  Spectrum governance regimes: efficiency properties and policy choices , 2006 .

[20]  Spectrum Property Rights and Practical Auction Design : The Australian Experience , 1997 .

[21]  William Lehr,et al.  The Role of Unlicensed in Spectrum Reform , 2009 .

[22]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Artifacts, Facilities, and Content: Information as a Common-Pool Resource , 2001 .

[23]  Dale N. Hatfield Spectrum management reform and the notion of the 'spectrum commons' , 2003 .

[24]  Ellen P. Goodman Spectrum Equity , 2005, J. Telecommun. High Technol. Law.

[25]  G. Brady Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action , 1993 .

[26]  Joseph Mitola,et al.  Cognitive Radio An Integrated Agent Architecture for Software Defined Radio , 2000 .

[27]  H. Gordon,et al.  The economic theory of a common-property resource: The fishery , 1954, Journal of Political Economy.

[28]  P. Weiser,et al.  Policing the Spectrum Commons , 2005 .

[29]  Jerry Brito,et al.  The Spectrum Commons in Theory and Practice , 2006 .

[30]  James M. Buchanan,et al.  Symmetric Tragedies: Commons and Anticommons* , 2000, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[31]  Lorrie Faith Cranor,et al.  Spectrum Management: Property Rights, Markets, and the Commons , 2003 .

[32]  Martin B. H. Weiss,et al.  Secondary use of spectrum: a survey of the issues , 2006 .

[33]  Eli M. Noam,et al.  Spectrum Auctions: Yesterday's Heresy, Today's Orthodoxy, Tomorrow's Anachronism. Taking the Next Step to Open Spectrum Access* , 1998, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[34]  A. D. Vany,et al.  A Property System for Market Allocation of the Electromagnetic Spectrum: A Legal-Economic-Engineering Study , 1969 .

[35]  Harald Gruber Spectrum Limits and Competition in Mobile Markets: The Role of Licence Fees , 2000 .

[36]  Leo Fulvio Minervini,et al.  New spectrum-using technologies and the future of spectrum management: a European policy perspective , 2006 .

[37]  T. Hazlett Assigning Property Rights to Radio Spectrum Users: Why Did Fcc License Auctions Take 67 Years?* , 1998, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[38]  H. Levin,et al.  Spectrum Allocation without Market , 1970 .

[39]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[40]  Economists' Statement on U.S. Broadband Policy , 2006 .

[41]  Jens Zander,et al.  Dynamic Spectrum Access, Phase 1 Scenarios and research challenges , 2004 .

[42]  Douglas Gary Lichtman,et al.  Telecommunications Law And Policy , 2001 .

[43]  Timothy J. Shepard,et al.  A channel access scheme for large dense packet radio networks , 1996, SIGCOMM '96.

[44]  Gregory L. Rosston,et al.  Using Market-Based Spectrum Policy to Promote the Public Interest , 1997 .

[45]  P. Lawson,et al.  Federal Communications Commission , 2004, Bell Labs Technical Journal.

[46]  Radio Spectrum Management for a Converging World , 2004 .

[47]  Gerard Pogorel,et al.  Nine Regimes of Radio Spectrum Management: A 4-Step Decision Guide , 2007 .

[48]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Ideas, Artifacts, and Facilities: Information as a Common-Pool Resource , 2003 .

[49]  Patrick Xavier,et al.  Policy issues in spectrum trading , 2006 .

[50]  Brian M. Sadler,et al.  Dynamic Spectrum Access: Signal Processing, Networking, and Regulatory Policy , 2006, ArXiv.

[51]  R.W. Brodersen,et al.  Implementation issues in spectrum sensing for cognitive radios , 2004, Conference Record of the Thirty-Eighth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2004..

[52]  John M. Chapin,et al.  COGNITIVE RADIOS FOR DYNAMIC SPECTRUM ACCESS - The Path to Market Success for Dynamic Spectrum Access Technology , 2007, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[53]  W. Webb The role of economic techniques in spectrum management , 1998 .

[54]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  Some Economics of Wireless Communications , 2002 .

[55]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  Overcoming Agoraphobia: Building the Commons of the Digitally Networked Environment , 2002 .

[56]  A. THE TRAGEDY OF THE ANTICOMMONS : PROPERTY IN THE TRANSITION FROM MARX TO MARKETS , 2007 .

[57]  P. T. Spiller,et al.  Towards a Property Rights Approach to Communications Spectrum , 1999 .

[58]  W. Melody,et al.  Radio Spectrum Allocation: Role of the Market , 1980 .

[59]  Rajesh Krishnan,et al.  Opportunistic spectrum access: challenges, architecture, protocols , 2006, WICON '06.

[60]  Douglas W. Webbink The Invisible Resource: Use and Regulation of the Radio Spectrum , 1971 .

[61]  William J. Baumol,et al.  Toward an Evolutionary Regime for Spectrum Governance: Licensing or Unrestricted Entry? , 2006 .

[62]  Gerald R. Faulhaber The future of wireless telecommunications: Spectrum as a critical resource , 2006, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[63]  Harald Gruber,et al.  Endogenous Sunk Costs in the Market for Mobile Telecommunications - The Role of Licence Fees , 2002 .

[64]  Ellen P. Goodman Spectrum Rights in the Telecosm to Come , 2004 .

[65]  Thomas W. Hazlett,et al.  Liberalizing US spectrum allocation , 2003 .

[66]  Panganamala Ramana Kumar,et al.  RHEINISCH-WESTFÄLISCHE TECHNISCHE HOCHSCHULE AACHEN , 2001 .

[67]  Jora R. Minasian Property Rights in Radiation: An Alternative Approach to Radio Frequency Allocation , 1975, The Journal of Law and Economics.