Shifts in hydroclimatology of US megaregions in response to climate change

Most of the population and economic growth in the United States occurs in megaregions as the clustered metropolitan areas, whereas climate change may amplify negative impacts on water and natural resources. This study assesses shifts in regional hydroclimatology of fourteen US megaregions in response to climate change over the 21st century. Hydroclimatic projections were simulated using the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) model driven by three downscaled climate models from the Multivariate Adaptive Constructed Analogs (MACA) dataset to cover driest to wettest future conditions in the conterminous United States (CONUS). Shifts in the regional hydroclimatolgy and basin characteristics of US megaregions were represented as a combination of changes in the aridity and evaporative indices using the Budyko framework and Fu’s equation. Changes in the climate types of US megaregions were estimated using the Fine Gaussian Support Vector Machine (SVM) method. The results indicate that Los Angeles, San Diego, and San Francisco are more likely to experience less arid conditions with some shifts from Continental to Temperate climate type while the hydroclimatology of Houston may become drier with some shifts from Temperate to Continental climate type. Additionally, water yield is likely to decrease in Seattle. Change in the hydroclimatology of Denver and Phoenix highly depends on the selected climate model. However, the basin characteristics of Phoenix have the highest sensitivity to climate change. Overall, the hydroclimatic conditions of Los Angeles, San Diego, Phoenix, Denver, and Houston have the highest sensitivity to climate change. Understanding of future shifts in hydroclimatology of megaregions can help decision-makers to attenuate negative consequences by implementing appropriate adaptation strategies, particularly in the water-scare megaregions.

[1]  M. Arabi,et al.  Impacts of Climate Change on Hydroclimatic Conditions of U.S. National Forests and Grasslands , 2021, Forests.

[2]  M. Arabi,et al.  Assessing Shifts in Regional Hydroclimatic Conditions of U.S. River Basins in Response to Climate Change over the 21st Century , 2020, Earth's Future.

[3]  M. Arabi,et al.  Chronic and Acute Coastal Flood Risks to Assets and Communities in Southeast Florida , 2020 .

[4]  X. Fettweis,et al.  Future evolution of the hydroclimatic conditions favouring floods in the south‐east of Belgium by 2100 using a regional climate model , 2020, International Journal of Climatology.

[5]  M. Arabi,et al.  A Probabilistic Approach for Characterization of Sub-Annual Socioeconomic Drought Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF) Relationships in a Changing Environment , 2020, Water.

[6]  L. Joyce,et al.  Climate scenarios and projections , 2020 .

[7]  Alain Pietroniro,et al.  Flexible vector-based spatial configurations in land models , 2020, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences.

[8]  Mona Hemmati,et al.  The Role of Urban Growth in Resilience of Communities Under Flood Risk , 2020, Earth's future.

[9]  Jefferson S. Wong,et al.  Improving the Representation of Subsurface Water Movement in Land Models , 2019 .

[10]  Wenzhao Liu,et al.  Interaction of vegetation, climate and topography on evapotranspiration modelling at different time scales within the Budyko framework , 2019, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.

[11]  J. Rockström,et al.  Future Hydroclimatic Impacts on Africa: Beyond the Paris Agreement , 2019, Earth's future.

[12]  T. Brown,et al.  Adaptation to Future Water Shortages in the United States Caused by Population Growth and Climate Change , 2019, Earth's Future.

[13]  Mahshid Ghanbari,et al.  A Coherent Statistical Model for Coastal Flood Frequency Analysis Under Nonstationary Sea Level Conditions , 2019, Earth's Future.

[14]  J. Abatzoglou,et al.  Climatic and physiographic controls of spatial variability in surface water balance over the contiguous United States using the Budyko relationship , 2017 .

[15]  A. Nelson.  Megaregion Projections 2015 to 2045 with Transportation Policy Implications , 2017 .

[16]  Garrett Dash Nelson,et al.  An Economic Geography of the United States: From Commutes to Megaregions , 2016, PloS one.

[17]  Shih-Chieh Kao,et al.  Regional hydrologic response to climate change in the conterminous United States using high-resolution hydroclimate simulations , 2016 .

[18]  Guangtao Fu,et al.  Reliable, resilient and sustainable water management: the Safe & SuRe approach , 2016, Global challenges.

[19]  Martyn P. Clark,et al.  Representation of spatial and temporal variability in large-domain hydrological models: case study for a mesoscale pre-Alpine basin , 2016 .

[20]  V. Benson-Lira,et al.  Loss of a lake system in a megacity: The impact of urban expansion on seasonal meteorology in Mexico City , 2016 .

[21]  G. Sun,et al.  Global pattern for the effect of climate and land cover on water yield , 2015, Nature Communications.

[22]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Global assessment of trends in wetting and drying over land , 2014 .

[23]  Richard M. Vogel,et al.  Hydroclimatic regimes: a distributed water-balance framework for hydrologic assessment, classification, and management , 2014 .

[24]  James M. Omernik,et al.  Ecoregions of the Conterminous United States: Evolution of a Hierarchical Spatial Framework , 2014, Environmental Management.

[25]  P. Morefield,et al.  Urban adaptation can roll back warming of emerging megapolitan regions , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Shih-Chieh Kao,et al.  A large-scale, high-resolution hydrological model parameter data set for climate change impact assessment for the conterminous US , 2013 .

[27]  Deliang Chen,et al.  Using the Köppen classification to quantify climate variation and change: An example for 1901–2010 , 2013 .

[28]  M. S. Moran,et al.  Ecosystem resilience despite large-scale altered hydroclimatic conditions , 2013, Nature.

[29]  Mingfang Zhang,et al.  The effects of cumulative forest disturbance on streamflow in a large watershed in the central interior of British Columbia, Canada , 2012 .

[30]  Thomas M. Missimer,et al.  Arid Lands Water Evaluation and Management , 2012 .

[31]  C. Bernhofer,et al.  Evaluation of water-energy balance frameworks to predict the sensitivity of streamflow to climate change , 2012 .

[32]  T. McVicar,et al.  Roots, storms and soil pores: Incorporating key ecohydrological processes into Budyko’s hydrological model , 2012 .

[33]  J. Abatzoglou,et al.  A comparison of statistical downscaling methods suited for wildfire applications , 2012 .

[34]  N. Diffenbaugh,et al.  Near‐term acceleration of hydroclimatic change in the western U.S. , 2011 .

[35]  JW Brakebill,et al.  Digital Hydrologic Networks Supporting Applications Related to Spatially Referenced Regression Modeling1 , 2011, Journal of the American Water Resources Association.

[36]  Dingbao Wang,et al.  Quantifying the relative contribution of the climate and direct human impacts on mean annual streamflow in the contiguous United States , 2011 .

[37]  C. Revenga,et al.  Urban growth, climate change, and freshwater availability , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Michael T. Coe,et al.  The effects of deforestation and climate variability on the streamflow of the Araguaia River, Brazil , 2011 .

[39]  Zongxue Xu,et al.  Streamflow response to climate variability and human activities in the upper catchment of the Yellow River Basin , 2009 .

[40]  Petra Todorovich.  America's emerging megaregions and implications for a national growth strategy , 2009 .

[41]  C. Daly,et al.  Physiographically sensitive mapping of climatological temperature and precipitation across the conterminous United States , 2008 .

[42]  Margaret Dewar,et al.  Planning for “Megaregions” in the United States , 2007 .

[43]  David D. Parrish,et al.  NORTH AMERICAN REGIONAL REANALYSIS , 2006 .

[44]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  Soil Water Balance and Ecosystem Response to Climate Change , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[45]  Andrew W. Western,et al.  A rational function approach for estimating mean annual evapotranspiration , 2004 .

[46]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Generating surfaces of daily meteorological variables over large regions of complex terrain , 1997 .

[47]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models , 1994 .

[48]  H. Laudon,et al.  Final Response to Reviewers: Dominant effect of increasing forest biomass on evapotranspiration: Interpretations of movement in Budyko Space , 2022 .