On the impact toughness of Al-15 vol.% B4C metal matrix composites

Abstract The present work was performed on ten metal matrix composites (MMCs) produced using the new powder injection technique. These MMCs were divided into two series in which pure aluminum was the matrix for one series, while an experimental 6063 alloy was the matrix for the second series. Small amounts of Ti, Zr and Sc were added to those composites, either individually or combined. In all cases the volume fraction of the reinforced B 4 C particles was in the range 12–15 vol. %. The molten metal was cast in an L-shaped metallic mold preheated at 350°C. Unnotched rectangular impact samples (1 cm × 1 cm × 5 cm) were prepared from these castings and heat treated. Samples were tested using instrumental impact testing machine. Microstructure and fracture surface were examined using Hitachi SU-8000 FESEM. The results show that the presence of Ti improves the wettability of the B 4 C particles and their adherence to the matrix. Repeated remelting at 730 °C applying vigorous mechanical stirring could lead to fragmentation of some of the B 4 C particles. Aluminum based composites exhibited better toughness compared to those obtained from 6063 based composites in all the studied conditions. The composite impact toughness was controlled by the precipitation and coarsening of hardening phase particles namely Mg 2 Si, Al 3 Zr and/or Al 3 Sc. Cracks in the fracture surface were observed to be initiated at the particle/matrix interfaces and propagate either through the B 4 C particles or through the protective layers. No complete debonding was reported due the presence of Zr/Ti/Sc rich layers which improved the particle/matrix adhesion.

[1]  Emmanuelle A. Marquis,et al.  Nanoscale structural evolution of Al3Sc precipitates in Al(Sc) alloys , 2001 .

[2]  A. Miserez.  Fracture and toughening of high volume fraction ceramic particle reinforced metals , 2003 .

[3]  J. Cornie,et al.  Wetting of ceramic particulates with liquid aluminum alloys: Part I. Experimental techniques , 1989 .

[4]  F. Samuel.  A New Technology for the Production of Al-B4C Metal Matrix Composites , 2013 .

[5]  F. Toptan,et al.  The Effect of Ti Addition on the Properties of Al-B4C Interface: A Microstructural Study , 2010 .

[6]  A. Samuel,et al.  Effects of Sr-modification, iron-based intermetallics and aging treatment on the impact toughness of 356 Al–Si–Mg alloy , 2011 .

[7]  N. D. Johnson.  Processing and mechanical properties of cast aluminum containing scandium, zirconium, and ytterbium , 2011 .

[8]  A. Al-Ahmari,et al.  The role of alloying additives and aging treatment on the impact behavior of 319 cast alloy , 2011 .

[9]  Jichun Ye,et al.  Cryomilling for the fabrication of a particulate B4C reinforced Al nanocomposite: Part I. Effects of process conditions on structure , 2006 .

[10]  J. Cornie,et al.  Wetting of ceramic particulates with liquid aluminum alloys: Part II. Study of wettability , 1989 .

[11]  Z. Zhou,et al.  The effect of small additions of scandium on the properties of aluminium alloys , 1995 .

[12]  M. Martínez,et al.  Optimization of processing parameters for the Al + 10% B4C system obtained by mechanical alloying , 2007 .

[13]  D. Seidman,et al.  Ambient- and high-temperature mechanical properties of isochronally aged Al-0.06Sc, Al-0.06Zr and Al-0.06Sc-0.06Zr (at.%) alloys , 2011 .

[14]  R. Shetty,et al.  Individual and Combined Effect of Reinforcements on Stir Cast Aluminium Metal Matrix Composites-A Review , 2013 .

[15]  S. Cho,et al.  Tensile properties of 5052 Al Matrix composites reinforced with B4C particles , 2001 .

[16]  E. Clouet,et al.  Precipitation kinetics of Al3Zr and Al3Sc in aluminum alloys modeled with cluster dynamics , 2005, cond-mat/0503485.

[17]  H. Ammar,et al.  Metallurgical parameters controlling matrix/B4C particulate interaction in aluminium–boron carbide metal matrix composites , 2013 .

[18]  Peng Lü.  A Comparison between B4C-ZrB2-Al Composite and B4C-Al Composite on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties , 2011 .

[19]  L. Froyen,et al.  Microstructure and interface characteristics of B4C, SiC and Al2O3 reinforced Al matrix composites: a comparative study , 2001 .

[20]  D. Lloyd.  The solidification microstructure of particulate reinforced aluminium/SiC composites , 1989 .

[21]  D. Seidman,et al.  Mechanical properties of Al(Sc,Zr) alloys at ambient and elevated temperatures , 2003 .

[22]  Jean-Pierre Celis,et al.  Velocity effects on the wear, friction and tribochemistry of aluminum MMC sliding against phenolic brake pad , 2004 .

[23]  H. Ammar,et al.  Mechanical properties and fracture of Al–15 vol.-%B4C based metal matrix composites , 2014 .

[24]  J. Lai,et al.  Precipitation strengthening of Al–B4C metal matrix composites alloyed with Sc and Zr , 2013 .

[25]  D. Seidman,et al.  Microstructure and mechanical properties of a 5754 aluminum alloy modified by Sc and Zr additions , 2002 .

[26]  H. Lashgari,et al.  Heat treatment effect on the microstructure, tensile properties and dry sliding wear behavior of A356–10%B4C cast composites , 2010 .

[27]  T. Raja,et al.  Effects on microstructure and hardness of al-b4c metal matrix composite fabricated through powder metallurgy , 2014 .

[28]  A. Elaya Perumal,et al.  Influence of B4C on the tribological and mechanical properties of Al 7075–B4C composites , 2013 .

[29]  C. Gode.  Mechanical properties of hot pressed SiCp and B4Cp/Alumix 123 composites alloyed with minor Zr , 2013 .

[30]  K. T. Ramesh,et al.  Tensile behavior and dynamic failure of aluminum 6092/B4C composites , 2006 .

[31]  D. Seidman,et al.  Precipitation evolution in Al–0.1Sc, Al–0.1Zr and Al–0.1Sc–0.1Zr (at.%) alloys during isochronal aging , 2010 .

[32]  M. Surappa,et al.  Preparation and properties of cast aluminium-ceramic particle composites , 1981 .

[33]  A. Yazdani,et al.  Evolution of reinforcement distribution in Al–B4C composites during accumulative roll bonding , 2011 .