Affective Communication of Map Symbols: A Semantic Differential Analysis

Maps enable us to relate to spatial phenomena and events from viewpoints far beyond direct experience. By employing signs and symbols, maps communicate about near as well as distant geospatial phenomena, events, objects, or ideas. Besides acting as identifiers, map signs and symbols may, however, not only denote but also connote. While most cartographic research has focused on the denoting character of visual variables, research from related disciplines stresses the importance of connotative qualities on affect, cognition, and behavior. Hence, this research focused on the connotative character of map symbols by empirically assessing the affective qualities of shape stimuli. In three stimulus conditions of cartographic and non-cartographic contexts, affective responses towards a set of eight shape stimuli were assessed by employing a semantic differential technique. Overall findings showed that shape symbols lead to, at times, highly distinctive affective responses. Findings further suggest two particular stimulus clusters of affective qualities that prevailed over all stimulus conditions, i.e., a cluster of asymmetric stimuli and a cluster of symmetric stimuli. Between the intersection of psychology, cartography, and semiotics, this paper outlines theoretical perspectives on cartographic semiotics, discusses empirical findings, and addresses implications for future research.

[1]  J. Russell A circumplex model of affect. , 1980 .

[2]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[3]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  Aesthetic Preference for Polygon Shape , 2015 .

[4]  Mary Anne Thompson,et al.  The influence of probabilistic volcanic hazard map properties on hazard communication , 2015, Journal of Applied Volcanology.

[5]  Barbara Bartz Petchenik,et al.  Cognition In Cartography , 1977 .

[6]  C. Osgood,et al.  A blind analysis of a case of multiple personality using the semantic differential. , 1954, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[7]  E. Loftus,et al.  Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory , 1974 .

[8]  J. Russell Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. , 2003, Psychological review.

[9]  Michael C. Hout,et al.  Multidimensional Scaling , 2003, Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology.

[10]  Mark Gahegan,et al.  Visual Semiotics & Uncertainty Visualization: An Empirical Study , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[11]  R. Eisenman,et al.  Complexity preference and semantic differential ratings of complexity-simplicity and symmetry-asymmetry , 1967 .

[12]  Sarah H. Creem-Regehr,et al.  Effects of ensemble and summary displays on interpretations of geospatial uncertainty data , 2017, Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications.

[13]  Alan M. MacEachren,et al.  How to Assess Visual Communication of Uncertainty? A Systematic Review of Geospatial Uncertainty Visualisation User Studies , 2014 .

[14]  Matt Duckham,et al.  Evaluating the impact of visualization of wildfire hazard upon decision-making under uncertainty , 2016, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[15]  Eugene Zhang,et al.  Design principles for origin-destination flow maps , 2018 .

[16]  B. Mesquita,et al.  The experience of emotion. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[17]  A cross-cultural investigation of the graphic differential , 1985 .

[18]  Silvia Klettner,et al.  Why Shape Matters - On the Inherent Qualities of Geometric Shapes for Cartographic Representations , 2019, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[19]  J. Russell,et al.  A cross-cultural study of a circumplex model of affect. , 1989 .

[20]  Ton Dijkstra,et al.  Affective Meaning, Concreteness, and Subjective Frequency Norms for Indonesian Words , 2016, Frontiers in psychology.

[21]  Ian Muehlenhaus,et al.  If Looks Could Kill: The Impact of Different Rhetorical Styles on Persuasive Geocommunication , 2012 .

[22]  Petr Kubícek,et al.  Effect of Size, Shape and Map Background in Cartographic Visualization: Experimental Study on Czech and Chinese Populations , 2018, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[23]  Ian Muehlenhaus,et al.  The design and composition of persuasive maps , 2013 .

[24]  J. Russell,et al.  A Description of the Affective Quality Attributed to Environments , 1980 .

[25]  Adrian Mander,et al.  The Skillings–Mack Test (Friedman Test when There are Missing Data) , 2009, The Stata journal.

[26]  Sidonie Christophe,et al.  Expressive Map Design Based on Pop Art: Revisit of Semiology of Graphics? , 2012 .

[27]  P. Vink,et al.  Pleasure, Arousal, Dominance: Mehrabian and Russell revisited , 2014, Current Psychology.