What goes through the gate? Exploring interference with visual feature binding

A series of experiments explored the mechanisms determining the encoding and storage of features and objects in visual working memory. We contrasted the effects of three types of visual suffix on cued recall of a display of colored shapes. The suffix was presented after the display and before the recall cue. The latter was either the color or shape of one of the objects and signaled recall of the object's other feature. In Experiments 1 and 2, we found a larger effect of 'plausible' suffixes comprising features (color and shape) drawn from the experimental set, relative to the effect of 'implausible' suffixes comprising features outside the experimental set. Experiment 3 extended this pattern by showing that 'semi-plausible' suffixes containing only one feature (either color or shape) from the experimental set had an equivalent effect to those with both features from the set. Reduction in accuracy was mainly due to an increase in recall of suffix features, rather than within-display confusions. The findings suggest a feature-based filtering process in visual working memory, with any stimuli that pass through this filter serving to directly overwrite existing object representations.

[1]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature binding, attention and object perception. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[2]  R G Crowder Mechanisms of auditory backward masking in the stimulus suffix effect. , 1978, Psychological review.

[3]  Anne Treisman,et al.  Object tokens, binding, and visual memory , 2006, Handbook of Binding and Memory.

[4]  G. Woodman,et al.  Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  A. Treisman,et al.  Binding in short-term visual memory. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  Daniel A. Gajewski,et al.  Feature bindings endure without attention: Evidence from an explicit recall task , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  Yuhong V. Jiang,et al.  Is visual short-term memory object based? Rejection of the “strong-object” hypothesis , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  Hubert D. Zimmer,et al.  Handbook of Binding and Memory - Perspectives from Cognitive Neuroscience , 2006, Handbook of Binding and Memory.

[9]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[10]  James R. Brockmole,et al.  The Visual World in Memory , 2008 .

[11]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory , 2005, Nature.

[12]  A. Baddeley The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Is the binding of visual features in working memory resource-demanding? , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  A. Nobre,et al.  Orienting Attention to Locations in Internal Representations , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  Dietmar Heinke,et al.  Modeling Grouping Through Interactions Between Top-Down and Bottom-Up Processes: The Grouping and Selective Attention for Identification Model (G-SAIM) , 2004, WAPCV.

[17]  A. Treisman Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[18]  S. Luck,et al.  Attention effects during visual short-term memory maintenance: Protection or prioritization? , 2007 .

[19]  Alan D Baddeley,et al.  Disruption of visual feature binding in working memory , 2011, Memory & cognition.

[20]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  When visual and verbal memories compete: Evidence of cross-domain limits in working memory , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  Dietmar Heinke,et al.  The Selective Attention for Identification Model (SAIM): Simulating Visual Search in Natural Colour Images , 2007, WAPCV.

[22]  Rachel S. Sussman,et al.  Orienting attention in visual working memory reduces interference from memory probes. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  Won Mok Shim,et al.  Visual memory for features, conjunctions, objects, and locations , 2008 .