Results from a long-term study of a portable field robot in urban terrain

The military have a considerable amount of experience from using robots for mine clearing and bomb removal. As new technology emerges it is necessary to investigate the possibly to expand robot use. This study has investigated an Army company, specialized in urban operations, while fulfilling their tasks with the support of a PackBot Scout. The robot was integrated and deployed as an ordinary component of the company and included modifying and retraining a number of standard behaviors to include the robot. This paper reports on the following issues: evaluation of missions where the platform can be deployed, what technical improvements are the most desired, and what are the new risks introduced by use of robots? Information was gathered through observation, interviews, and a questionnaire. The results indicate the robot to be useful for reconnaissance and mapping. The users also anticipated that the robot could be used to decrease the risks of IEDs by either triggering or by neutralising them with a disruptor. The robot was further considered to be useful for direct combat if armed, and for placing explosive loads against, for example, a door. Autonomous rendering of maps, acquiring images, two-way audio, and improved sensing such as IR were considered important improvements. The robot slowing down the pace of the unit was considered to be the main risk when used in urban operations.

[1]  H. R. Everett,et al.  ThrowBot: design considerations for a man-portable throwable robot , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[2]  Chinh Nguyen,et al.  Development and testing for physical security robots , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[3]  Henrik I. Christensen,et al.  The use of robots in harsh and unstructured field applications , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[4]  Kenneth A. Ebert,et al.  Supporting the joint warfighter by development, training, and fielding of man-portable UGVs , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[5]  J. Kumagai Techno cops [police robotic and electronic technology] , 2002 .

[6]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Human-robot interaction in rescue robotics , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[7]  Henrik I. Christensen,et al.  Evaluation of robot deployment in live missions with the military, police, and fire brigade , 2007, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[8]  Patrick J. Treado,et al.  Demonstration of a Robot-Based Raman Spectroscopic Detector for the Identification of CBE Threat Agents , 2006 .

[9]  Fumitoshi Matsuno,et al.  Rescue Robots and Systems in Japan , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics.

[10]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  Beyond Usability Evaluation: Analysis of Human-Robot Interaction at a Major Robotics Competition , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[11]  MR Jones Autonomous Robots in SWAT Applications : Research , Design , and Operations Challenges , 2002 .

[12]  Henrik I. Christensen,et al.  Long-term study of a portable field robot in urban terrain , 2007, J. Field Robotics.

[13]  H. Amano Present status and problems of fire fighting robots , 2002, Proceedings of the 41st SICE Annual Conference. SICE 2002..