Engineering gene expression and protein synthesis by modulation of nuclear shape

The current understanding of the relationships between cell shape, intracellular forces and signaling, nuclear shape and organization, and gene expression is in its infancy. Here we introduce a method for investigating gene-specific responses in individual cells with controlled nuclear shape and projected area. The shape of the nuclei of primary osteogenic cells were controlled on microfabricated substrata with regiospecific chemistry by confining attachment and spreading of isolated cells on adhesive islands. Gene expression and protein synthesis were altered by changing nuclear shape. Collagen I synthesis correlated directly with cell shape and nuclear shape index (NSI), where intermediate values of nuclear distension (6 < NSI < 8) promoted maximum synthesis. Osteocalcin mRNA, a bone-specific differentiation marker, was observed intracellularly by using reverse transcription in situ PCR at 4 days in cells constrained by the pattern and not detected in unconstrained cells of similar projected area, but different NSI. Our data supports the concept of gene expression and protein synthesis based on optimal distortion of the nucleus, possibly altering transcription factor affinity for DNA, transport to the nucleus, or nuclear matrix organization. The combination of microfabricated surfaces, reverse transcription in situ PCR, and NSI measurement is an excellent system to study how transcription factors, the nuclear matrix, and the cytoskeleton interact to control gene expression and may be useful for studying a wide variety of other cell shape/gene expression relationships.

[1]  D. Gilbert,et al.  The Carboxyl-terminal Domain of Phosphophoryn Contains Unique Extended Triplet Amino Acid Repeat Sequences Forming Ordered Carboxyl-Phosphate Interaction Ridges That May Be Essential in the Biomineralization Process* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[2]  Daniel I. C. Wang,et al.  Engineering cell shape and function. , 1994, Science.

[3]  S. Penman,et al.  Progressive loss of shape-responsive metabolic controls in cells with increasingly transformed phenotype , 1981, Cell.

[4]  J. Bidwell,et al.  Rat Osteoblast and Osteosarcoma Nuclear Matrix Proteins Bind with Sequence Specificity to the Rat Type I Collagen Promoter1. , 1997, Endocrinology.

[5]  M. Falk,et al.  Factors influencing synthesis and mineralization of bone matrix from fetal bovine bone cells grown in vitro , 1992, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[6]  J. Folkman,et al.  Role of cell shape in growth control , 1978, Nature.

[7]  Barbara Lom,et al.  A versatile technique for patterning biomolecules onto glass coverslips , 1993, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[8]  G. Karsenty,et al.  MAPK Pathways Activate and Phosphorylate the Osteoblast-specific Transcription Factor, Cbfa1* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[9]  F. Watt,et al.  Cell shape controls terminal differentiation of human epidermal keratinocytes. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Renny T. Franceschi,et al.  Role of the α2-Integrin in Osteoblast-specific Gene Expression and Activation of the Osf2 Transcription Factor* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Demonstration of mechanical connections between integrins, cytoskeletal filaments, and nucleoplasm that stabilize nuclear structure. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Erkki Ruoslahti,et al.  Stretching Is Good for a Cell , 1997, Science.

[13]  D Kleinfeld,et al.  Controlled outgrowth of dissociated neurons on patterned substrates , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  J. Aubin,et al.  Osteoblast and chondroblast differentiation. , 1995, Bone.

[15]  M J Bissell,et al.  Tissue phenotype depends on reciprocal interactions between the extracellular matrix and the structural organization of the nucleus. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  C. Feldherr,et al.  Regulation of nuclear transport in proliferating and quiescent cells. , 1993, Experimental cell research.

[17]  G. Stein,et al.  Osteocalcin gene promoter-binding factors are tissue-specific nuclear matrix components. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  K E Healy,et al.  Surfaces designed to control the projected area and shape of individual cells. , 1999, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[19]  R. Berezney,et al.  The nuclear matrix: a structural milieu for genomic function. , 1995, International review of cytology.

[20]  M. Toner,et al.  Microengineering of cellular interactions. , 2000, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[21]  K E Healy,et al.  The role of vitronectin in the attachment and spatial distribution of bone-derived cells on materials with patterned surface chemistry. , 1997, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[22]  J. Bidwell,et al.  Nuclear Matrix Proteins and Osteoblast Gene Expression , 1998, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[23]  A. Aulthouse Prolonged exposure of human chondrocytes to ascorbic acid modifies cellular behavior in an agarose gel , 1994, The Anatomical record.

[24]  S. Hubchak,et al.  P(AAm-co-EG) Interpenetrating Polymer Networks Grafted to Oxide Surfaces: Surface Characterization, Protein Adsorption, and Cell Detachment Studies , 1997 .

[25]  K. Miyazono,et al.  Changes in osteoblast phenotype during differentiation of enzymatically isolated rat calvaria cells. , 1998, Bone.

[26]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Geometric control of cell life and death. , 1997, Science.