Experimental disturbances reveal group-level costs of social instability

In group-living species, social stability is an important trait associated with the evolution of complex behaviours such as cooperation. While the drivers of stability in small groups are relatively well studied, little is known about the potential impacts of unstable states on animal societies. Temporary changes in group composition, such as a social group splitting and recombining (i.e. a disturbance event), can result in individuals having to re-establish their social relationships, thus taking time away from other tasks such as foraging or vigilance. Here, we experimentally split socially stable groups of captive zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata), and quantified the effects of repeated disturbance events on (1) group foraging efficiency, and (2) co-feeding associations when subgroups were recombined. We found that the efficiency of groups to deplete a rich, but ephemeral, resource patch decreased after just a single short disturbance event. Automated tracking of individuals showed that repeated disturbances reduced efficiency by causing social relationships to become more differentiated and weaker, resulting in fewer individuals simultaneously accessing the patch. Our experiment highlights how short-term disturbances can severely disrupt social structure and group functionality, revealing potential costs associated with group instability that can have consequences for the evolution of animal societies.

[1]  P. Kappeler.  A framework for studying social complexity , 2019, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[2]  A. Ridley,et al.  The benefits of pair bond tenure in the cooperatively breeding pied babbler (Turdoides bicolor) , 2018, Ecology and evolution.

[3]  S. Abades,et al.  Social instability decreases alloparental care and quality of weaned offspring in a communally rearing rodent , 2017, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  Jacob M. Graving,et al.  An automated barcode tracking system for behavioural studies in birds , 2017, bioRxiv.

[5]  M. Platt,et al.  Family network size and survival across the lifespan of female macaques , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  Damien R Farine,et al.  A guide to null models for animal social network analysis , 2017, Methods in ecology and evolution.

[7]  S. Abades,et al.  The modulating role of group stability on fitness effects of group size is different in females and males of a communally rearing rodent. , 2016, The Journal of animal ecology.

[8]  F. D. de Waal,et al.  How chimpanzees cooperate in a competitive world , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Takao Sasaki,et al.  Bringing a Time-Depth Perspective to Collective Animal Behaviour. , 2016, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[10]  J. Lehmann,et al.  The effects of social network position on the survival of wild Barbary macaques, Macaca sylvanus , 2016 .

[11]  Gerald G Carter,et al.  Social benefits of non-kin food sharing by female vampire bats , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  From Individuals to Groups and Back: The Evolutionary Implications of Group Phenotypic Composition , 2015, Trends in Ecology & Evolution.

[13]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  Constructing, conducting and interpreting animal social network analysis , 2015, The Journal of animal ecology.

[14]  I. Couzin,et al.  Shared decision-making drives collective movement in wild baboons , 2015, Science.

[15]  Andrew M. Mountcastle,et al.  BEEtag: A Low-Cost, Image-Based Tracking System for the Study of Animal Behavior and Locomotion , 2015, bioRxiv.

[16]  J. Altmann,et al.  Social affiliation matters: both same-sex and opposite-sex relationships predict survival in wild female baboons , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  J. Silk.  Evolutionary perspectives on the links between close social bonds, health, and fitness , 2014 .

[18]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[19]  J. Adelman,et al.  Linking social environment and stress physiology in feral mares (Equus caballus): group transfers elevate fecal cortisol levels. , 2014, General and comparative endocrinology.

[20]  G. Beauchamp.  Social Predation: How Group Living Benefits Predators and Prey , 2013 .

[21]  Guillermo Paz-y-Miño-C,et al.  Dominance hierarchy formation in a model organism, the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata), and its potential application to laboratory research , 2013 .

[22]  J. Poole,et al.  Effects of social disruption in elephants persist decades after culling , 2013, Frontiers in Zoology.

[23]  Gerald Wilkinson,et al.  Does food sharing in vampire bats demonstrate reciprocity? , 2013, Communicative & integrative biology.

[24]  S. Shultz,et al.  Stepwise evolution of stable sociality in primates , 2011, Nature.

[25]  Andrew J. King,et al.  Collective decision‐making and fission–fusion dynamics: a conceptual framework , 2011 .

[26]  Andrew J. King,et al.  Where Next? Group Coordination and Collective Decision Making by Primates , 2011, International Journal of Primatology.

[27]  L. Vigilant,et al.  Social Bonds Enhance Reproductive Success in Male Macaques , 2010, Current Biology.

[28]  Robert M. Seyfarth,et al.  Strong and Consistent Social Bonds Enhance the Longevity of Female Baboons , 2010, Current Biology.

[29]  R. Zann,et al.  Undirected Song Encourages the Breeding Female Zebra Finch to Remain in the Nest , 2010 .

[30]  R. Zann,et al.  Undirected Song in Wild Zebra Finch Flocks: Contexts and Effects of Mate Removal , 2010 .

[31]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics in structured populations , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  J. Silk,et al.  The benefits of social capital: close social bonds among female baboons enhance offspring survival , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  Elissa Z Cameron,et al.  Social bonds between unrelated females increase reproductive success in feral horses , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  D. McDonald,et al.  Predicting fate from early connectivity in a social network , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Brian Hare,et al.  Tolerance Allows Bonobos to Outperform Chimpanzees on a Cooperative Task , 2007, Current Biology.

[36]  D. Krakauer,et al.  Policing stabilizes construction of social niches in primates , 2006, Nature.

[37]  R. Connor,et al.  A division of labour with role specialization in group–hunting bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) off Cedar Key, Florida , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  M. Newman,et al.  Identifying the role that animals play in their social networks , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  Jeanne Altmann,et al.  Social Bonds of Female Baboons Enhance Infant Survival , 2003, Science.

[40]  Peter Nonacs,et al.  Measuring and Using Skew in the Study of Social Behavior and Evolution , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[41]  R. Zann.  The Zebra Finch: A Synthesis of Field and Laboratory Studies , 1996 .

[42]  R. Zann.  Song and call learning in wild zebra finches in south-east Australia , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[43]  N. Davies,et al.  Territorial defence in the speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria): The resident always wins , 1978, Animal Behaviour.

[44]  R. A. Hinde,et al.  Interactions, Relationships and Social Structure , 1976 .

[45]  John Maynard Smith,et al.  The logic of asymmetric contests , 1976, Animal Behaviour.

[46]  Aashish Manglik,et al.  Shared decision-making drives collective movement in wild baboons , .