Classification of Daily Life Activities by Decision Level Fusion of Inertial Sensor Data

The fusion of inertial sensor data is heavily used for the classification of daily life activities. The knowledge about the performed daily life activities is mandatory to give physically inactive people feedback about their individual quality of life. In this paper, four inertial sensors were placed on wrist, chest, hip and ankle of 19 subjects, which had to perform seven daily life activities. Each sensor node separately performed preprocessing, feature extraction and classification. In the final step, the classifier decisions of the sensor nodes were fused and a single activity was predicted by majority voting. The proposed classification system obtained an overall mean classification rate of 93.9 % and was robust against defect sensors. The system allows an easy integration of new sensors without retraining of the complete system, which is an advantage over commonly used feature level fusion approaches.

[1]  John Paul Varkey,et al.  Human motion recognition using a wireless sensor-based wearable system , 2012, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[2]  R. Shephard Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires , 2003, British journal of sports medicine.

[3]  Robert X. Gao,et al.  Multisensor Data Fusion for Physical Activity Assessment , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  Pascal Vasseur,et al.  Introduction to Multisensor Data Fusion , 2005, The Industrial Information Technology Handbook.

[5]  Dominik Schuldhaus,et al.  Hierarchical, Multi-Sensor Based Classification of Daily Life Activities: Comparison with State-of-the-Art Algorithms Using a Benchmark Dataset , 2013, PloS one.

[6]  Weihua Sheng,et al.  Human daily activity recognition in robot-assisted living using multi-sensor fusion , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  B. Ripley,et al.  Pattern Recognition , 1968, Nature.

[8]  Ling Bao,et al.  Activity Recognition from User-Annotated Acceleration Data , 2004, Pervasive.

[9]  Johannes Peltola,et al.  Activity classification using realistic data from wearable sensors , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[10]  Adrian Burns,et al.  SHIMMER™ – A Wireless Sensor Platform for Noninvasive Biomedical Research , 2010, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[11]  L. Benini,et al.  Activity recognition from on-body sensors by classifier fusion: sensor scalability and robustness , 2007, 2007 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information.

[12]  Shigeo Abe DrEng Pattern Classification , 2001, Springer London.

[13]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern classification, 2nd Edition , 2000 .

[14]  Sergios Theodoridis,et al.  Pattern Recognition, Fourth Edition , 2008 .

[15]  Ulf Ekelund,et al.  Assessment of physical activity – a review of methodologies with reference to epidemiological research: a report of the exercise physiology section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation , 2010, European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology.

[16]  Stewart G Trost,et al.  Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.