Polymerization with a micro-xenon light of a resin-modified glass ionomer: a shear bond strength study 15 minutes after bonding.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the initial shear bond strength (15 minutes after bonding) of a resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGIC, Fuji Ortho LC) cured with two different light-curing units: a conventional visible light (Ortholux XT) and a microxenon light (Aurys). Seventy-five freshly extracted bovine permanent mandibular incisors were randomly assigned to one of five groups; each group consisted of 15 specimens. Group A (Transbond XT) and group B (Fuji Ortho LC) were exposed to the visible light for 20 and 40 seconds, respectively, and used as controls. The remaining three groups (C, D, and E) were bonded with Fuji Ortho LC and cured with Aurys for 10, 5, and 2 seconds, respectively. All samples were tested in a shear mode on an Instron universal testing machine 15 minutes after bonding. The shear bond strength of the control group bonded with Transbond XT was significantly higher (P = 0.000) than those of all the other groups tested. Regarding Fuji Ortho LC, no statistically significant differences were found between the bond strength of the control group cured with Ortholux XT, and those of the groups cured with Aurys for 2, 5, and 10 seconds. The present findings indicate that, compared with visible light-curing, the micro-xenon light enables the clinician to significantly reduce the curing time of RMGICs, without affecting their initial shear bond strengths.

[1]  R. M. Wilson,et al.  Demineralization around orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and fluoride-releasing resin composite. , 2001, Pediatric dentistry.

[2]  E. Combe,et al.  Shear bond strength of stainless steel orthodontic brackets with a moisture-insensitive primer. , 2001, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[3]  M. F. Sfondrini,et al.  Effects of conventional and high-intensity light-curing on enamel shear bond strength of composite resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer. , 2001, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[4]  A. Weaver,et al.  Effect of argon laser irradiation on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets: an in vitro study. , 2000, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[5]  S. Bishara,et al.  Effect of light-cure time on the initial shear bond strength of a glass-ionomer adhesive. , 2000, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[6]  B. Prahl-Andersen,et al.  The air-abrasion technique versus the conventional acid-etching technique: A quantification of surface enamel loss and a comparison of shear bond strength. , 2000, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[7]  D. Millett,et al.  Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding. , 2010, The Angle orthodontist.

[8]  Z. Cehreli,et al.  Comparison of shear bond strength of three bonding agents with metal and ceramic brackets. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[9]  E. Gunel,et al.  Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[10]  S. Bishara,et al.  Effect of time on the shear bond strength of glass ionomer and composite orthodontic adhesives. , 1999, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[11]  A. Mamandras,et al.  A comparison of the shear bond strengths of two glass ionomer cements. , 1999, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[12]  F. Mante,et al.  Shear bond strength of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro comparative study. , 1999, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[13]  K. Donly,et al.  Enamel demineralization adjacent to orthodontic brackets bonded with hybrid glass ionomer cements: an in vitro study. , 1998, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[14]  L. Oesterle,et al.  The use of bovine enamel in bonding studies. , 1998, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[15]  S. Bishara,et al.  Evaluation of a new light-cured orthodontic bonding adhesive. , 1998, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[16]  V. Cacciafesta,et al.  Shear bond strengths of ceramic brackets bonded with different light-cured glass ionomer cements: an in vitro study. , 1998, European journal of orthodontics.

[17]  Messersmith Ml,et al.  Effects of tooth surface preparation on the shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cements. , 1997 .

[18]  M. Persson,et al.  White spot reduction when using glass ionomer cement for bonding in orthodontics: a longitudinal and comparative study. , 1997, European journal of orthodontics.

[19]  V. Cacciafesta,et al.  Light-cured glass ionomer cement as a bracket adhesive with different types of enamel conditioners. , 1997, Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie.

[20]  R. A. Chamda,et al.  Time-related bond strengths of light-cured and chemically cured bonding systems: an in vitro study. , 1996, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[21]  M. Persson,et al.  A clinical evaluation of a glass ionomer cement as an orthodontic bonding adhesive compared with an acrylic resin. , 1996, European journal of orthodontics.

[22]  L. Mancl,et al.  A three-year clinical trial using a glass ionomer cement for the bonding of orthodontic brackets. , 1996, The Angle orthodontist.

[23]  J. Miguel,et al.  Clinical comparison between a glass ionomer cement and a composite for direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. , 1995, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[24]  W. Wiltshire Shear bond strengths of a glass ionomer for direct bonding in orthodontics. , 1994, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[25]  D. Millett,et al.  A 5-year clinical review of bond failure with a no-mix adhesive (Right on). , 1994, European journal of orthodontics.

[26]  W. Barkmeier,et al.  Shear bond strength of composite to enamel and dentin using Scotchbond Multi-Purpose. , 1994, American journal of dentistry.

[27]  J F McCabe,et al.  A Critique of Bond Strength Testing in Orthodontics , 1994, British journal of orthodontics.

[28]  J. Arends,et al.  An in vivo study on the merits of two glass ionomers for the cementation of orthodontic bands. , 1991, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[29]  G. Koch,et al.  Fluoride release from glass ionomer cement in vivo and in vitro. , 1991, Swedish dental journal.

[30]  R. Nanda,et al.  An in vitro evaluation of bond strength of three glass ionomer cements. , 1990, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[31]  I. C. Howard,et al.  A critique of bond strength measurements. , 1989, Journal of dentistry.

[32]  C. Youngson,et al.  An in vitro Study of the Bond Strength of a Glass Ionomer Cement in the Direct Bonding of Orthodontic Brackets , 1988, British journal of orthodontics.

[33]  J. Arends,et al.  Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization. Part 1. Lesion development. , 1988, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[34]  R. Oliver,et al.  The effect of different methods of bracket removal on the amount of residual adhesive. , 1988, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[35]  M. Iwaku,et al.  Bovine Teeth as Possible Substitutes in the Adhesion Test , 1983, Journal of dental research.

[36]  A. Gwinnett,et al.  Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. , 1982, American journal of orthodontics.

[37]  R. Thompson,et al.  Enamel loss due to prophylaxis and multiple bonding/debonding of orthodontic attachments. , 1981, American journal of orthodontics.

[38]  D. Way,et al.  Enamel loss during orthodontic bonding and subsequent loss during removal of filled and unfilled adhesives. , 1978, American journal of orthodontics.

[39]  J. Mclean,et al.  The bonding of glass ionomer cements to metal and tooth substrates , 1977, British Dental Journal.

[40]  I. Reynolds A Review of Direct Orthodontic Bonding , 1975 .

[41]  A. D. Wilson,et al.  The properties of a glass ionomer cement , 1973, British Dental Journal.