Polymerization with a micro-xenon light of a resin-modified glass ionomer: a shear bond strength study 15 minutes after bonding.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. M. Wilson,et al. Demineralization around orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and fluoride-releasing resin composite. , 2001, Pediatric dentistry.
[2] E. Combe,et al. Shear bond strength of stainless steel orthodontic brackets with a moisture-insensitive primer. , 2001, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[3] M. F. Sfondrini,et al. Effects of conventional and high-intensity light-curing on enamel shear bond strength of composite resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer. , 2001, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[4] A. Weaver,et al. Effect of argon laser irradiation on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets: an in vitro study. , 2000, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[5] S. Bishara,et al. Effect of light-cure time on the initial shear bond strength of a glass-ionomer adhesive. , 2000, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[6] B. Prahl-Andersen,et al. The air-abrasion technique versus the conventional acid-etching technique: A quantification of surface enamel loss and a comparison of shear bond strength. , 2000, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[7] D. Millett,et al. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding. , 2010, The Angle orthodontist.
[8] Z. Cehreli,et al. Comparison of shear bond strength of three bonding agents with metal and ceramic brackets. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.
[9] E. Gunel,et al. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.
[10] S. Bishara,et al. Effect of time on the shear bond strength of glass ionomer and composite orthodontic adhesives. , 1999, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[11] A. Mamandras,et al. A comparison of the shear bond strengths of two glass ionomer cements. , 1999, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[12] F. Mante,et al. Shear bond strength of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro comparative study. , 1999, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[13] K. Donly,et al. Enamel demineralization adjacent to orthodontic brackets bonded with hybrid glass ionomer cements: an in vitro study. , 1998, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[14] L. Oesterle,et al. The use of bovine enamel in bonding studies. , 1998, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[15] S. Bishara,et al. Evaluation of a new light-cured orthodontic bonding adhesive. , 1998, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[16] V. Cacciafesta,et al. Shear bond strengths of ceramic brackets bonded with different light-cured glass ionomer cements: an in vitro study. , 1998, European journal of orthodontics.
[17] Messersmith Ml,et al. Effects of tooth surface preparation on the shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cements. , 1997 .
[18] M. Persson,et al. White spot reduction when using glass ionomer cement for bonding in orthodontics: a longitudinal and comparative study. , 1997, European journal of orthodontics.
[19] V. Cacciafesta,et al. Light-cured glass ionomer cement as a bracket adhesive with different types of enamel conditioners. , 1997, Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie.
[20] R. A. Chamda,et al. Time-related bond strengths of light-cured and chemically cured bonding systems: an in vitro study. , 1996, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[21] M. Persson,et al. A clinical evaluation of a glass ionomer cement as an orthodontic bonding adhesive compared with an acrylic resin. , 1996, European journal of orthodontics.
[22] L. Mancl,et al. A three-year clinical trial using a glass ionomer cement for the bonding of orthodontic brackets. , 1996, The Angle orthodontist.
[23] J. Miguel,et al. Clinical comparison between a glass ionomer cement and a composite for direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. , 1995, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[24] W. Wiltshire. Shear bond strengths of a glass ionomer for direct bonding in orthodontics. , 1994, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[25] D. Millett,et al. A 5-year clinical review of bond failure with a no-mix adhesive (Right on). , 1994, European journal of orthodontics.
[26] W. Barkmeier,et al. Shear bond strength of composite to enamel and dentin using Scotchbond Multi-Purpose. , 1994, American journal of dentistry.
[27] J F McCabe,et al. A Critique of Bond Strength Testing in Orthodontics , 1994, British journal of orthodontics.
[28] J. Arends,et al. An in vivo study on the merits of two glass ionomers for the cementation of orthodontic bands. , 1991, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[29] G. Koch,et al. Fluoride release from glass ionomer cement in vivo and in vitro. , 1991, Swedish dental journal.
[30] R. Nanda,et al. An in vitro evaluation of bond strength of three glass ionomer cements. , 1990, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[31] I. C. Howard,et al. A critique of bond strength measurements. , 1989, Journal of dentistry.
[32] C. Youngson,et al. An in vitro Study of the Bond Strength of a Glass Ionomer Cement in the Direct Bonding of Orthodontic Brackets , 1988, British journal of orthodontics.
[33] J. Arends,et al. Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization. Part 1. Lesion development. , 1988, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[34] R. Oliver,et al. The effect of different methods of bracket removal on the amount of residual adhesive. , 1988, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[35] M. Iwaku,et al. Bovine Teeth as Possible Substitutes in the Adhesion Test , 1983, Journal of dental research.
[36] A. Gwinnett,et al. Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. , 1982, American journal of orthodontics.
[37] R. Thompson,et al. Enamel loss due to prophylaxis and multiple bonding/debonding of orthodontic attachments. , 1981, American journal of orthodontics.
[38] D. Way,et al. Enamel loss during orthodontic bonding and subsequent loss during removal of filled and unfilled adhesives. , 1978, American journal of orthodontics.
[39] J. Mclean,et al. The bonding of glass ionomer cements to metal and tooth substrates , 1977, British Dental Journal.
[40] I. Reynolds. A Review of Direct Orthodontic Bonding , 1975 .
[41] A. D. Wilson,et al. The properties of a glass ionomer cement , 1973, British Dental Journal.