Studying Teachers’ Sensemaking to Investigate Teachers’ Responses to Professional Development Focused on New Standards

Recent research on teacher professional development (PD) underscores the importance of the coherence of PD with standards, curriculum, and assessment. Teachers’ judgments of the coherence of PD with larger system goals influence their decisions about what ideas and resources they appropriate from PD. Little research, however, has examined how teachers formulate these judgments and why teachers’ judgments vary within the same system and for the same reform. In this article, we use organizational theory’s concept of sensemaking to examine teachers’ responses to PD related to the Next Generation Science Standards within two schools in the United States. Our study shows that teachers’ perceptions of coherence emerge from interactions within PD, associated curriculum materials, and with colleagues and leaders in their schools. Some teachers, we found, were able to manage ambiguity, uncertainty, and perceived incoherence productively, while others foreclosed deep and sustained sensemaking. Our findings suggest the need for PD to engage teachers in sustained sensemaking activity around issues of perceived incoherence to bolster teachers’ emergent understandings of standards and improve the likelihood of implementing instructional practices aligned to standards.

[1]  H. Simon,et al.  Rational choice and the structure of the environment. , 1956, Psychological review.

[2]  Carolyn Yates,et al.  A Creative Experience. , 1971 .

[3]  W. Doyle,et al.  The practicality ethic in teacher decision-making , 1977 .

[4]  L. Shulman Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform , 1987 .

[5]  Robert H. Waterman,et al.  Adhocracy: The Power to Change , 1990 .

[6]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation , 1991 .

[7]  K. Weick FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[8]  D. Clandinin,et al.  Teachers' personal practical knowledge on the professional knowledge landscape , 1997 .

[9]  Gardens or graveyards: Science education reform and school culture , 1998 .

[10]  Jan H. van Driel,et al.  Evaluation of story-line methodology in research on teachers' practical knowledge , 1999 .

[11]  Jonathan A. Supovitz,et al.  The Effects of Professional Development on Science Teaching Practices and Classroom Culture , 2000 .

[12]  Laura M. Desimone,et al.  What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers , 2001 .

[13]  C. Coburn,et al.  Collective Sensemaking about Reading: How Teachers Mediate Reading Policy in Their Professional Communities , 2001 .

[14]  Jan H. van Driel,et al.  Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers' practical knowledge , 2001 .

[15]  Andrew D. Brown,et al.  A Narratological Approach to Understanding Processes of Organizing in a UK Hospital , 2003 .

[16]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Situating Teachers’ Instructional Practices in the Institutional Setting of the School and District , 2003 .

[17]  Paul Black,et al.  Inside Science Education Reform: A History of Curricular and Policy Change , 2003 .

[18]  Mark Wilson,et al.  Constructing Measures: An Item Response Modeling Approach , 2004 .

[19]  C. Coburn,et al.  Beyond Decoupling: Rethinking the Relationship Between the Institutional Environment and the Classroom , 2004 .

[20]  Robert E. Stake,et al.  Multiple Case Study Analysis , 2005 .

[21]  J. Bransford,et al.  How students learn : history, mathematics, and science in the classroom , 2005 .

[22]  C. Coburn,et al.  Shaping Teacher Sensemaking: School Leaders and the Enactment of Reading Policy , 2005 .

[23]  W. Penuel,et al.  The roles of regional partners in supporting an international earth science education program , 2005 .

[24]  James P. Spillane,et al.  Policy implementation and cognition: The role of human, social, and distributed cognition in framing policy implementation , 2006 .

[25]  O. D. Jong TRENDS IN WESTERN SCIENCE CURRICULA AND SCIENCE EDUCATION RESEARCH: A BIRD’S EYE VIEW , 2007 .

[26]  H. Schweingruber,et al.  TAKING SCIENCE TO SCHOOL: LEARNING AND TEACHING SCIENCE IN GRADES K-8 , 2007 .

[27]  Lawrence P. Gallagher,et al.  What Makes Professional Development Effective? Strategies That Foster Curriculum Implementation , 2007 .

[28]  E. Kazemi,et al.  New Directions for the Design and Study of Professional Development , 2008 .

[29]  C. Coburn,et al.  District Policy and Teachers’ Social Networks , 2008 .

[30]  Katherine L. McNeill,et al.  Learning‐goals‐driven design model: Developing curriculum materials that align with national standards and incorporate project‐based pedagogy , 2008 .

[31]  Lawrence P. Gallagher,et al.  Is Alignment Enough? Investigating the Effects of State Policies and Professional Development on Science Curriculum Implementation. , 2009 .

[32]  David A. Gillam,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2012 .

[33]  William R. Penuel,et al.  Using Social Network Analysis to Study How Collegial Interactions Can Augment Teacher Learning from External Professional Development , 2012, American Journal of Education.

[34]  James W Pellegrino,et al.  Proficiency in Science: Assessment Challenges and Opportunities , 2013, Science.

[35]  Helen R. Quinn,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2013 .

[36]  Helen R. Quinn,et al.  Science and Language for English Language Learners in Relation to Next Generation Science Standards and with Implications for Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Mathematics , 2013 .

[37]  Ngss Lead States Next generation science standards : for states, by states , 2013 .

[38]  James W. Pellegrino,et al.  Developing Assessments for the Next Generation Science Standards. , 2014 .

[39]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[40]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Management innovation , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.