Identification of Informal Reasoning Fallacies as a Function of Epistemological Level, Grade Level, and Cognitive Ability.

Informal reasoning fallacies are violations of critical discussion norms. As epistemological understanding of knowledge justification appears to underlie the informal reasoning skills of argument construction and evaluation, it was hypothesized that adolescents with greater epistemological sophistication would be more able to identify informal reasoning fallacies. It was hypothesized that 11th graders would be more epistemologically sophisticated than 7th or 9th graders and, thus, would more likely identify fallacies. Students responded to questions regarding argument scenarios that did or did not contain fallacies. More 11th graders identified fallacies. Epistemological level predicted only identification of one type of fallacy that might be described as epistemological in nature. Cognitive ability also seemed to contribute to the increased ability with grade to identify fallacies.

[1]  S. Toulmin.  The uses of argument , 1960 .

[2]  W. G. Perry.  Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. , 1970 .

[3]  J. Broughton.  “Beyond Formal Operations”: Theoretical Thought in Adolescence , 1977, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[4]  J. Broughton,et al.  Development of concepts of self, mind, reality, and knowledge , 1978 .

[5]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[6]  M. Davison,et al.  The Justification of Beliefs in Young Adults: A Longitudinal Study. , 1983 .

[7]  Mm. Liabre.  Standard Progressive Matrices , 1984 .

[8]  Michael Lamport Commons,et al.  Beyond Formal Operations: Late Adolescent and Adult Cognitive Development , 1984 .

[9]  F. H. Eemeren,et al.  Speech acts in argumentative discussions , 1984 .

[10]  Michael P. Ryan.  Monitoring Text Comprehension: Individual Differences in Epistemological Standards , 1984 .

[11]  J. Baron.  Rationality and Intelligence , 1985 .

[12]  D. Perkins.  Postprimary Education Has Little Impact on Informal Reasoning. , 1985 .

[13]  Sorel Cahan,et al.  Age versus schooling effects on intelligence development. , 1989 .

[14]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation , 1989 .

[15]  D. Perkins.  Reasoning as it is and could be: An empirical perspective. , 1989 .

[16]  Kathleen M. Galotti,et al.  Approaches to studying formal and everyday reasoning. , 1989 .

[17]  Bernhard Wilpert,et al.  Applied psychology : an international review , 1989 .

[18]  M. Chandler,et al.  Relativism and stations of epistemic doubt. , 1990, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[19]  Marlene Schommer.  Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. , 1990 .

[20]  D. Kuhn.  THE SKILLS OF ARGUMENT , 2008, Education for Thinking.

[21]  Jonathan Baron,et al.  Beliefs about thinking. , 1991 .

[22]  D. Perkins,et al.  Informal reasoning and education , 1991 .

[23]  O. Spreen,et al.  A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary , 1991 .

[24]  F. H. Eemeren,et al.  Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-dialectical Perspective , 1992 .

[25]  Jonathan Baron,et al.  Why Teach Thinking?-An Essay , 1993 .

[26]  A. diSessa.  Toward an Epistemology of Physics , 1993 .

[27]  Michael Weinstock,et al.  How Well Do Jurors Reason? Competence Dimensions of Individual Variation in a Juror Reasoning Task , 1994 .

[28]  K. Kitchener,et al.  Developing Reflective Judgment: Understanding and Promoting Intellectual Growth and Critical Thinking in Adolescents and Adults. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series and Jossey-Bass Social and Behavioral Science Series. , 2009 .

[29]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  DISPOSITIONAL DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE MOTIVATION : THE LIFE AND TIMES OF INDIVIDUALS VARYING IN NEED FOR COGNITION , 1996 .

[30]  J. F. Voss,et al.  Who Reasons Well? Two Studies of Informal Reasoning Among Children of Different Grade, Ability, and Knowledge Levels , 1996 .

[31]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Motivated closing of the mind: "seizing" and "freezing". , 1996, Psychological review.

[32]  P. Pintrich,et al.  The Development of Epistemological Theories: Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing and Their Relation to Learning , 1997 .

[33]  Marlene Schommer,et al.  The development of epistemological beliefs among secondary students : A longitudinal study , 1997 .

[34]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. , 1997 .

[35]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Individual differences in rational thought. , 1998 .

[36]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[37]  D. Walton.  The Appeal to Ignorance, or Argumentum Ad Ignorantiam , 1999 .

[38]  D. Kuhn.  A Developmental Model of Critical Thinking , 1999 .

[39]  Michael Weinstock,et al.  The development of epistemological understanding , 2000 .

[40]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  Explanation and evidence in informal argument , 2000 .

[41]  D. Kuhn.  How do People Know? , 2001, Psychological science.

[42]  B. Hofer.  Personal Epistemology Research: Implications for Learning and Teaching , 2001 .

[43]  Searching for the Roots of the Circumstantial Ad Hominem , 2001 .

[44]  O. Duell,et al.  Measures of People's Beliefs About Knowledge and Learning , 2001 .

[45]  L. Rips.  Two Kinds of Reasoning , 2001 .

[46]  Patricia M. King,et al.  The Reflective Judgment Model: Twenty years of research on epistemic cognition. , 2002 .

[47]  Michael Weinstock,et al.  What is epistemological thinking and why does it matter , 2002 .

[48]  K. Stanovich,et al.  The domain specificity and generality of disjunctive reasoning: Searching for a generalizable critical thinking skill , 2002 .

[49]  R. Kitchener.  Folk epistemology: An introduction , 2002 .

[50]  M. Chandler,et al.  Competing claims about competing knowledge claims. , 2002 .

[51]  P. Alexander,et al.  Beliefs about schooled knowledge: Domain specific or domain general? , 2002 .

[52]  B. Vansledright,et al.  Confronting History’s Interpretive Paradox While Teaching Fifth Graders to Investigate the Past , 2002 .

[53]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Personal Epistemology The Psychology of Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing , 2002 .

[54]  Yair Neuman.  Go ahead, prove that God does not exist! On high school students’ ability to deal with fallacious arguments , 2003 .

[55]  Yair Neuman,et al.  The Role of Text Representation in Students’ Ability to Identify Fallacious Arguments , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[56]  Dana L. Zeidler,et al.  The Role of Moral Reasoning on Socioscientific Issues and Discourse in Science Education , 2003 .

[57]  Deanna Kuhn,et al.  The development of argument skills. , 2003, Child development.

[58]  Michael Weinstock,et al.  The everyday production of knowledge: Individual differences in epistemological understanding and juror-reasoning skill , 2003 .

[59]  Mark Felton,et al.  The development of discourse strategies in adolescent argumentation , 2004 .

[60]  Tobias Krettenauer.  Metaethical cognition and epistemic reasoning development in adolescence , 2004 .

[61]  Yair Neuman,et al.  The effect of a reason's truth-value on the judgment of a fallacious argument. , 2004, Acta psychologica.

[62]  Iris Tabak,et al.  Missing the point or missing the norms? Epistemological norms as predictors of students’ ability to identify fallacious arguments , 2004 .

[63]  Yair Neuman,et al.  Pupils' evaluation and generation of evidence and explanation in argumentation. , 2005, The British journal of educational psychology.

[64]  Michael Weinstock.  Cognitive Bases for Effective Participation in Democratic Institutions: Argument Skill and Juror Reasoning , 2005 .

[65]  Iris Tabak,et al.  Knowledge Is Knowledge Is Knowledge? The Relationship between Personal and Scientific Epistemologies , 2005 .