Implementation of a prototypal optical sorter as core of the new pre-treatment configuration of a mechanical-biological treatment plant treating OFMSW through anaerobic digestion

The pre-treatment of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste is one of the main challenges in mechanical–biological treatment plants equipped with anaerobic digesters. The present study shows the successful revamping of the Sant Adria del Besos plant pre-treatment line, where a prototypal optical sorter, a wet-crusher, and a hydrocyclone–decanter substituted the previous pulper and decanter system. The prototypal optical sorter, which uses near-infrared spectroscopy, was able to enhance the organic matter content from 40% to 60% in a more efficient and less energy demanding way than conventional systems. The new configuration not only improved digester feedstock and performance but also led to a significant reduction of the treatment and maintenance costs. The high methane yield of the digester, between 480 and 580CH4m3t−1VS, together with an energy efficiency index of 2.2kWhproduced/kWhconsumed, demonstrated the viability of this novel configuration with respect to conventional ones. Thus, optical sorting arises as a new alternative for mechanical–biological treatment plants that needs to be constructed or revamped.

[1]  Jes la Cour Jansen,et al.  Effects of pre-treatment technologies on quantity and quality of source-sorted municipal organic waste for biogas recovery. , 2007, Waste management.

[2]  L. A. Fdez.-Güelfo,et al.  Start-up of thermophilic-dry anaerobic digestion of OFMSW using adapted modified SEBAC inoculum. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[3]  Fabrice Béline,et al.  Prediction of hydrogen sulphide production during anaerobic digestion of organic substrates. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[4]  Mohammad J. Taherzadeh,et al.  Uncertainty over techno-economic potentials of biogas from municipal solid waste (MSW): A case study on an industrial process , 2014 .

[5]  K. S. Creamer,et al.  Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[6]  Davide Tonini,et al.  Bioenergy, material, and nutrients recovery from household waste: Advanced material, substance, energy, and cost flow analysis of a waste refinery process , 2014 .

[7]  D Bolzonella,et al.  Semi-dry thermophilic anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste: focusing on the start-up phase. , 2003, Bioresource technology.

[8]  V. O’Flaherty,et al.  Effect of pH on growth kinetics and sulphide toxicity thresholds of a range of methanogenic, syntrophic and sulphate-reducing bacteria , 1998 .

[9]  J. M. Chimenos,et al.  Improving anaerobic digestion of pig manure by adding in the same reactor a stabilizing agent formulated with low-grade magnesium oxide. , 2014 .

[10]  Yuan Zhenhong,et al.  Semi-dry mesophilic anaerobic digestion of water sorted organic fraction of municipal solid waste (WS-OFMSW). , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[11]  Piet N.L. Lens,et al.  Pretreatment methods to enhance anaerobic digestion of organic solid waste , 2014 .

[12]  Luigi Frunzo,et al.  Modelling the effect of the OLR and OFMSW particle size on the performances of an anaerobic co-digestion reactor , 2011 .

[13]  L. de Baere,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of MSW in Europe. , 2010 .

[14]  Huirong Xu,et al.  Near infrared spectroscopy for on/in-line monitoring of quality in foods and beverages: A review , 2008 .

[15]  W. Parker,et al.  Anaerobic Digestion of the Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste (OFMSW)—Full Scale vs Laboratory Results , 2011 .

[16]  M. Pérez,et al.  Effect of substrate concentration on dry mesophilic anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW). , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[17]  S. Desbois,et al.  Determinant impact of waste collection and composition on anaerobic digestion performance: industrial results. , 2000, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[18]  S. Heaven,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of source-segregated domestic food waste: performance assessment by mass and energy balance. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[19]  Xiujin Li,et al.  Removal of H2S during Anaerobic Bioconversion of Dairy Manure , 2009 .

[20]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[21]  J. Mata-Álvarez,et al.  Biomethanization of the Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Wastes , 2015 .

[22]  Daniel Novarino,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of extruded OFMSW. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[23]  C. Gallert,et al.  Scale-up of anaerobic digestion of the biowaste fraction from domestic wastes. , 2003, Water research.

[24]  Stephen Ogaji,et al.  Designs of anaerobic digesters for producing biogas from municipal solid-waste , 2008 .

[25]  Jerry D. Murphy,et al.  Assessment of the resource associated with biomethane from food waste , 2013 .

[26]  J. Mata-Álvarez,et al.  Response of a sewage sludge mesophilic anaerobic digester to short and long-term thermophilic temperature fluctuations , 2013 .

[27]  Francesco Di Maria,et al.  Optimization of Solid State Anaerobic Digestion by inoculum recirculation: The case of an existing Mechanical Biological Treatment plant , 2012 .

[28]  A. Guwy,et al.  Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays. , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[29]  L. Walker,et al.  Performance of a commercial-scale DiCOM demonstration facility treating mixed municipal solid waste in comparison with laboratory-scale data. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[30]  J Mata-Alvarez,et al.  Anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure and crude glycerol at mesophilic conditions: biogas and digestate. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[31]  J la Cour Jansen,et al.  Need for improvements in physical pretreatment of source-separated household food waste. , 2013, Waste management.

[32]  N Bernet,et al.  Dynamic effect of total solid content, low substrate/inoculum ratio and particle size on solid-state anaerobic digestion. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[33]  L De Baere,et al.  Will anaerobic digestion of solid waste survive in the future , 2006 .

[34]  R. Barrena,et al.  A complete mass balance of a complex combined anaerobic/aerobic municipal source-separated waste treatment plant. , 2012, Waste management.

[35]  S Mace,et al.  Dry anaerobic digestion of differently sorted organic municipal solid waste: a full-scale experience. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[36]  R. Bayard,et al.  Mass balance to assess the efficiency of a mechanical-biological treatment. , 2008, Waste management.

[37]  J. Mata-Álvarez,et al.  Assessing total and volatile solids in municipal solid waste samples , 2014, Environmental technology.

[38]  James D. Browne,et al.  Assessing the variability in biomethane production from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste in batch and continuous operation , 2014 .

[39]  G Perkoulidis,et al.  A multi-criteria ranking of different technologies for the anaerobic digestion for energy recovery of the organic fraction of municipal solid wastes. , 2009, Bioresource technology.