Network sampling, based on the experience of conducting the large-scale 1986 Robert Wood Johnson Foundation National Access to Health Care Survey, was shown to be a viable alternative to more conventional procedures for oversampling persons with a low incidence and prevalence of health conditions. The network sampling approach was a more economical and methodologically less obtrusive means of increasing sample size of persons with desired characteristics than conventional procedures. The approach requires estimating the incidence, prevalence, or both of the required characteristics in the population. As the proportion of persons in the population with the characteristic increases, network sampling may lose its attractiveness. However, this has to be judged both in economic terms and in terms of the methodologic consequences of using other procedures to increase the size of subgroups of interest. As discussed, additional methodologic work is required on the consequences of network sampling for study group representativeness and sampling bias. However, network sampling, in the authors' opinion, is sufficiently promising to warrant methodologic explorations to answer these and other relevant questions about its use
[1]
Paul S. Levy,et al.
Multiplicity Estimation of Proportions Based on Ratios of Random Variables
,
1974
.
[2]
Gad Nathan,et al.
An Empirical Study of Response and Sampling Errors for Multiplicity Estimates with Different Counting Rules
,
1976
.
[3]
M. Sirken,et al.
A cystic fibrosis pilot survey in three New England states.
,
1962,
American journal of public health and the nation's health.
[4]
Paul S. Levy,et al.
Optimum Allocation in Stratified Random Network Sampling for Estimating the Prevalence of Attributes in Rare Populations
,
1977
.
[5]
Ronald Czaja,et al.
Reporting Bias and Sampling Errors in a Survey of a Rare Population Using Multiplicity Counting Rules
,
1986
.
[6]
Joseph Waksberg,et al.
Sampling Methods for Random Digit Dialing
,
1978
.
[7]
Monroe G. Sirken,et al.
Stratified Sample Surveys with Multiplicity
,
1972
.
[8]
R. Andersen,et al.
Access to medical care in the U.S. : who has it, who doesn't
,
1985,
American Political Science Review.