Achieving record hot spot energies with large HDC implosions on NIF in HYBRID-E

HYBRID-E is an inertial confinement fusion implosion design that increases energy coupled to the hot spot by increasing the capsule scale in cylindrical hohlraums while operating within the current experimental limits of the National Ignition Facility. HYBRID-E reduces the hohlraum scale at a fixed capsule size compared to previous HYBRID designs, thereby increasing the hohlraum efficiency and energy coupled to the capsule, and uses the cross-beam energy transfer (CBET) to control the implosion symmetry by operating the inner (23° and 30°) and outer (44° and 50°) laser beams at different wavelengths ( Δ λ > 0). Small case to capsule ratio designs can suffer from insufficient drive at the waist of the hohlraum. We show that only a small amount of wavelength separation between the inner and outer beams ( Δ λ 1–2 A) is required to control the symmetry in low-gas-filled hohlraums (0.3 mg/cm3 He) with enough drive at the waist of the hohlraum to symmetrically drive capsules 1180 μm in outer radius. This campaign is the first to use the CBET to control the symmetry in 0.3 mg/cm3 He-filled hohlraums, the lowest gas fill density yet fielded with Δ λ > 0. We find a stronger sensitivity of hot spot P2 in μm per Angstrom (40–50 μm/A wavelength separation) than observed in high-gas-filled hohlraums and previous longer pulse designs that used a hohlraum gas fill density of 0.6 mg/cm3. There is currently no indication of transfer roll-off with increasing Δ λ, indicating that even longer pulses or larger capsules could be driven using the CBET in cylindrical hohlraums. We show that the radiation flux symmetry is well controlled during the foot of the pulse, and that the entire implosion can be tuned symmetrically in the presence of the CBET in this system, with low levels of laser backscatter out of the hohlraum and low levels of hot electron production from intense laser–plasma interactions. Radiation hydrodynamic simulations can accurately represent the early shock symmetry and be used as a design tool, but cannot predict the late-time radiation flux symmetry during the peak of the pulse, and semi-empirical models are used to design the experiments. Deuterium–tritium (DT)-layered tests of 1100 μm inner radius implosions showed performance close to expectations from simulations at velocities up to ∼360 km/s, and record yields at this velocity, when increasing the DT fuel layer thickness to mitigate hydrodynamic mixing of the ablator into the hot spot as a result of defects in the ablator. However, when the implosion velocity was increased, mixing due to these defects impacted performance. The ratio of measured to simulated yield for these experiments was directly correlated with the level of observed mixing. These simulations suggest that reducing the mixing, e.g., by improving the capsule defects, could result in higher performance. In addition, future experiments are planned to reduce the coast time at this scale, delay between the peak compression and the end of the laser, to increase the hot spot convergence and pressure. To reduce the coast time by several hundred ps compared to the 1100 μm inner radius implosions, HYBRID-E has also fielded 1050 μm inner radius capsules, which resulted in higher hot spot pressure and a fusion energy yield of ∼170 kJ.

[1]  D. K. Bradley,et al.  Metrics for long wavelength asymmetries in inertial confinement fusion implosions on the National Ignition Facility , 2014 .

[2]  Steven W. Haan,et al.  Three-dimensional HYDRA simulations of National Ignition Facility targets , 2001 .

[3]  Jochen Schein,et al.  X-ray conversion efficiency of high-Z hohlraum wall materials for indirect drive ignition , 2008 .

[4]  L. R. Benedetti,et al.  Application of cross-beam energy transfer to control drive symmetry in ICF implosions in low gas fill Hohlraums at the National Ignition Facility , 2020 .

[5]  L. Divol,et al.  Symmetric fielding of the largest diamond capsule implosions on the NIF , 2020 .

[6]  D. A. Callahan,et al.  Approaching a burning plasma on the NIF , 2018, Physics of Plasmas.

[7]  K. G. Krauter,et al.  Shock Timing experiments on the National Ignition Facility , 2011 .

[8]  L. Divol,et al.  Exploring the limits of case-to-capsule ratio, pulse length, and picket energy for symmetric hohlraum drive on the National Ignition Facility Laser , 2018 .

[9]  C R Danly,et al.  Neutron source reconstruction from pinhole imaging at National Ignition Facility. , 2014, The Review of scientific instruments.

[10]  L. Divol,et al.  Integrated performance of large HDC-capsule implosions on the National Ignition Facility , 2020 .

[11]  Scott C. Wilks,et al.  Energy transfer between crossing laser beams , 1996 .

[12]  L. Divol,et al.  Beyond alpha-heating: driving inertially confined fusion implosions toward a burning-plasma state on the National Ignition Facility , 2018, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion.

[13]  D. A. Callahan,et al.  Fuel gain exceeding unity in an inertially confined fusion implosion , 2014, Nature.

[14]  Neal R. Pederson,et al.  Gated x-ray detector for the National Ignition Facility , 2006 .

[15]  J. R. Rygg,et al.  Resolving hot spot microstructure using x-ray penumbral imaging (invited). , 2016, The Review of scientific instruments.

[16]  O. Landen,et al.  Probing the seeding of hydrodynamic instabilities from nonuniformities in ablator materials using 2D velocimetry , 2017, Physics of Plasmas.

[17]  O. Landen,et al.  Comparison of plastic, high density carbon, and beryllium as indirect drive NIF ablators , 2018 .

[18]  David K. Bradley,et al.  Line-imaging velocimeter for shock diagnostics at the OMEGA laser facility , 2004 .

[19]  T. Chapman,et al.  Stimulated backscatter of laser light from BigFoot hohlraums on the National Ignition Facility , 2019, Physics of Plasmas.

[20]  D. Turnbull,et al.  Hotspot parameter scaling with velocity and yield for high-adiabat layered implosions at the National Ignition Facility. , 2020, Physical review. E.

[21]  O. Landen,et al.  On the importance of minimizing “coast-time” in x-ray driven inertially confined fusion implosions , 2017 .

[22]  Jay D. Salmonson,et al.  Three-dimensional simulations of low foot and high foot implosion experiments on the National Ignition Facility , 2016 .

[23]  M. Kruse,et al.  An analytic asymmetric-piston model for the impact of mode-1 shell asymmetry on ICF implosions , 2020 .

[24]  Daniel Casey,et al.  The high velocity, high adiabat, ``Bigfoot'' campaign and tests of indirect-drive implosion scaling , 2017 .

[25]  P. Michel,et al.  The role of a detailed configuration accounting (DCA) atomic physics package in explaining the energy balance in ignition-scale hohlraums , 2011 .

[26]  J. M. Mack,et al.  Diagnosing inertial confinement fusion gamma ray physics (invited). , 2010, The Review of scientific instruments.

[27]  D. Strozzi,et al.  Beryllium capsule implosions at a case-to-capsule ratio of 3.7 on the National Ignition Facility , 2018, Physics of Plasmas.

[28]  L. Divol,et al.  Hotspot conditions achieved in inertial confinement fusion experiments on the National Ignition Facility , 2020, Physics of Plasmas.

[29]  O. Landen,et al.  Integrated modeling of cryogenic layered highfoot experiments at the NIF , 2016 .

[30]  Edward I. Moses,et al.  The National Ignition Facility: Ushering in a new age for high energy density science , 2009 .

[31]  Kevin D. McGillivray,et al.  Design and construction of a Gamma reaction history diagnostic for the National Ignition Facility , 2010, ICOPS 2010.

[32]  L. Pickworth,et al.  Hot-spot mix in large-scale HDC implosions at NIF , 2020 .