Pure linguistic PROMETHEE I and II methods for heterogeneous MCGDM problems

AbstractThe PROMETHEE methods basic principle is focused on a pairwise comparison of alternatives for each criterion, selecting a preference function type that often requires parameters in order to obtain a preference value. When a MCGDM problem is defined in an heterogeneous context, an adequate and common approach is to unify the involved information in linguistic values. However, for each criterion, there is a difficulty to select the specific preference function and define its parameters because they are expressed by crisp values in the unit interval, when the information involved in the problem has been unified into linguistic values. In this paper, a methodology for modeling linguistic preference functions in order to facilitate the selecting of each linguistic preference function type and the definition of its parameters is proposed, providing a more realistic definition of the criteria. Therefore, a generic linguistic preference function is proposed whose inputs and outputs are linguistic values. ...

[1]  B. Mareschal,et al.  Water resources planning in the Middle East: application of the PROMETHEE V multicriteria method , 1995 .

[2]  Jean Pierre Brans,et al.  HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS: THE PROMETHEE METHOD , 1986 .

[3]  Akbar Esfahanipour,et al.  Decision making in stock trading: An application of PROMETHEE , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  John Psarras,et al.  Equity portfolio management within the MCDM frame: a literature review , 2009 .

[5]  David Ben-Arieh,et al.  Linguistic-labels aggregation and consensus measure for autocratic decision making using group recommendations , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[6]  Núria Agell,et al.  Ranking multi-attribute alternatives on the basis of linguistic labels in group decisions , 2012, Inf. Sci..

[7]  Ding-Hong Peng,et al.  Multi-criteria Group Decision Making with Heterogeneous Information Based on Ideal Points Concept , 2013, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[8]  Bertrand Mareschal,et al.  The PROMETHEE VI procedure: how to differentiate hard from soft multicriteria problems , 1995 .

[9]  Luis Martínez-López,et al.  AN EXTENDED HIERARCHICAL LINGUISTIC MODEL FOR DECISION‐MAKING PROBLEMS , 2011, Comput. Intell..

[10]  Luis Martínez-López,et al.  An analysis of symbolic linguistic computing models in decision making , 2013, Int. J. Gen. Syst..

[11]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  Granular Computing: Analysis and Design of Intelligent Systems , 2013 .

[12]  Deng-Feng Li,et al.  A systematic approach to heterogeneous multiattribute group decision making , 2010, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[13]  Yi-Chung Hu,et al.  A PROMETHEE-based classification method using concordance and discordance relations and its application to bankruptcy prediction , 2011, Inf. Sci..

[14]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  D. Dubois,et al.  An introduction to bipolar representations of information and preference , 2008 .

[16]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  Incorporating uncertainty in the PROMETHEE MCDA method , 2003 .

[17]  Thomas Spengler,et al.  Fuzzy outranking for environmental assessment. Case study: iron and steel making industry , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[18]  Habib Chabchoub,et al.  PROMETHEE-MD-2T method for project selection , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  An overview on the 2-tuple linguistic model for computing with words in decision making: Extensions, applications and challenges , 2012, Inf. Sci..

[20]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words , 2000, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[21]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[22]  José M. Merigó,et al.  Linguistic Aggregation Operators for Linguistic Decision Making Based on the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence , 2010, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[23]  José M. Merigó,et al.  Induced 2-tuple linguistic generalized aggregation operators and their application in decision-making , 2013, Inf. Sci..

[24]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys , 2005 .

[25]  Macarena Espinilla,et al.  FLINTSTONES: A fuzzy linguistic decision tools enhancement suite based on the 2-tuple linguistic model and extensions , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[26]  Bertrand Mareschal,et al.  Prométhée: a new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis , 1984 .

[27]  Wei Yang,et al.  New aggregation operators based on the Choquet integral and 2-tuple linguistic information , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[28]  Diala Dhouib,et al.  A new multi-criteria approach dealing with dependent and heterogeneous criteria for end-of-life product strategy , 2011, Appl. Math. Comput..

[29]  B. Mareschal,et al.  Nuclear waste management: An application of the multicriteria PROMETHEE methods , 1990 .

[30]  Alessio Ishizaka,et al.  Multi-criteria Decision Analysis: Methods and Software , 2013 .

[31]  Kejiang Zhang,et al.  Incorporating linguistic, probabilistic, and possibilistic information in a risk‐based approach for ranking contaminated sites , 2010, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[32]  Ping-Feng Pai,et al.  An Integrated Methodology using Linguistic PROMETHEE and Maximum Deviation Method for Third-party Logistics Supplier Selection , 2010, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[33]  Amihai Motro,et al.  Fusionplex: resolution of data inconsistencies in the integration of heterogeneous information sources , 2006, Inf. Fusion.

[34]  Jean Pierre Brans,et al.  A PREFERENCE RANKING ORGANIZATION METHOD , 1985 .

[35]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Multi Criteria Supplier Selection Using Fuzzy PROMETHEE Method , 2014, Supply Chain Management Under Fuzziness.

[36]  G. W. Wei,et al.  Some harmonic Aggregation Operators with 2-Tuple Linguistic Assessment Information and their Application to Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making , 2011, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[37]  Y. Ilker Topcu,et al.  An integrated decision aid system for Bosphorus water-crossing problem , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[38]  Macarena Espinilla,et al.  A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HETEROGENEOUS DECISION ANALYSIS APPROACHES APPLIED TO SUSTAINABLE ENERGY EVALUATION , 2012 .

[39]  P. Vincke,et al.  Note-A Preference Ranking Organisation Method: The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making , 1985 .

[40]  M. Ramachandran,et al.  Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning--A review , 2004 .

[41]  Bertrand Mareschal,et al.  The PROMCALC & GAIA decision support system for multicriteria decision aid , 1994, Decis. Support Syst..

[42]  Reza Baradaran Kazemzadeh,et al.  PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..