Value of Combined Interpretation of Computed Tomography Response and Positron Emission Tomography Response for Prediction of Prognosis After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to assess the value of tumor response evaluation using combined interpretation of [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) for the prediction of clinical outcome and pathologic response in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. Methods: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board with a waiver of informed consent. Forty-four consecutive patients (M:F = 32:12; mean age, 60.7 years) with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by curative surgery. Time to recurrence (TTR) was stratified by radiologic, metabolic, and radiologic-metabolic response using the Kaplan-Meier method. The accuracy of radiologic, metabolic, and radiologic-metabolic response criteria for the prediction of pathologic response was evaluated. Results: Radiologic-metabolic responders had a longer TTR than nonresponders (mean TTR, 58.7 months versus 22.3 months, p = 0.001 with criteria of ≥30% reduction of size and ≥50% reduction of [maximum standardized uptake value] SUVmax and mean TTR, 49.4 months versus 23.5 months, p = 0.022 with criteria of ≥30% reduction of size and ≥25% reduction of SUVmax, respectively). The TTR of radiologic responders (criteria of ≥30% reduction of size) and metabolic responders (criteria of ≥25% reduction of SUVmax) was not different from the TTR of nonresponders (p > 0.05). The accuracy for the prediction of pathologic response was 70% in radiologic responders, 52 to 75% in metabolic responders, and 73 to 82% in radiologic-metabolic responders. Conclusions: Tumor response evaluation using combined interpretation of [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose-PET and CT was more effective than single interpretation of CT response or PET response alone for the prediction of tumor recurrence and pathologic response.

[1]  G. Bepler,et al.  Computed tomography response, but not positron emission tomography scan response, predicts survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  T. Gauler,et al.  Correlation of PET/CT Findings and Histopathology after Neoadjuvant Therapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2008, Oncology.

[3]  Mary W Redman,et al.  Disease control rate at 8 weeks predicts clinical benefit in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results from Southwest Oncology Group randomized trials. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  G. Oremek,et al.  Value of tumour and inflammatory markers in lung cancer. , 2007, Anticancer research.

[5]  H. Dittmann,et al.  Repeat 18F-FDG PET for monitoring neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer. , 2007, Lung Cancer.

[6]  Otto S Hoekstra,et al.  Prognostic relevance of response evaluation using [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  R. Cerfolio,et al.  Repeat FDG-PET after neoadjuvant therapy is a predictor of pathologic response in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[8]  H. Schäfers,et al.  Value of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography after induction therapy of locally advanced bronchogenic carcinoma. , 2004, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[9]  C. Dooms,et al.  Long-term survival of surgically staged IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer treated with surgical combined modality approach: analysis of a 7-year prospective experience. , 2004, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[10]  A. Borczuk,et al.  Histologic Assessment of Non–Small Cell Lung Carcinoma after Neoadjuvant Therapy , 2003, Modern Pathology.

[11]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Positron emission tomography in non-small-cell lung cancer: prediction of response to chemotherapy by quantitative assessment of glucose use. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  A. Fischman,et al.  FDG-PET in staging and restaging non-small cell lung cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: correlation with histopathology. , 2002, Lung cancer.

[13]  L. Voltolini,et al.  Results of induction chemotherapy followed by surgical resection in patients with stage IIIA (N2) non-small cell lung cancer: the importance of the nodal down-staging after chemotherapy. , 2001, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[14]  M. Thomas,et al.  Grading of tumor regression in non-small cell lung cancer : morphology and prognosis. , 2001, Chest.

[15]  M. Christian,et al.  [New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors]. , 2000, Bulletin du cancer.

[16]  W. Richards,et al.  Nodal stage after induction therapy for stage IIIA lung cancer determines patient survival. , 2000, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[17]  K. Herholz,et al.  Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group. , 1999, European journal of cancer.

[18]  N. Willich,et al.  Impact of preoperative bimodality induction including twice-daily radiation on tumor regression and survival in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  J. Ciezki,et al.  Short-course induction chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[20]  P. Dupont,et al.  Potential use of FDG-PET scan after induction chemotherapy in surgically staged IIIa-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer: a prospective pilot study. The Leuven Lung Cancer Group. , 1998, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[21]  J. Crowley,et al.  Concurrent cisplatin/etoposide plus chest radiotherapy followed by surgery for stages IIIA (N2) and IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer: mature results of Southwest Oncology Group phase II study 8805. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  M. Kris,et al.  Pathologic complete response in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer following preoperative chemotherapy: implications for the design of future non-small-cell lung cancer combined modality trials. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  M. Dewhirst,et al.  Cycling hypoxia and free radicals regulate angiogenesis and radiotherapy response , 2008, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[24]  N. Altorki,et al.  Positron emission tomography scanning poorly predicts response to preoperative chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[25]  S. Larson,et al.  An initial experience with FDG-PET in the imaging of residual disease after induction therapy for lung cancer. , 2002, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[26]  K. Albain Induction chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy before surgery for non-small-cell lung cancer , 2000, Current oncology reports.