Co-producing “Post-normal” Climate Knowledge with Communities in Northeast Bangladesh

AbstractConcepts of knowledge “co-production” are increasingly encouraged in climate research, including as an extended mode of climate science inquiry. So-called “post-normal” science offers oppor...

[1]  James W. Jones,et al.  Warming up to climate change: a participatory approach to engaging with agricultural stakeholders in the Southeast US , 2013, Regional Environmental Change.

[2]  Giandomenico Majone,et al.  The Critical Appraisal of Scientific Inquiries with Policy Implications , 1985 .

[3]  John Turnpenny,et al.  Noisy and definitely not normal: responding to wicked issues in the environment, energy and health , 2009 .

[4]  Trond Vedeld,et al.  Climate adaptation at what scale? Multi-level governance, resilience, and coproduction in Saint Louis, Senegal , 2016, Natural Hazards.

[5]  P. Weingart.  From “Finalization” to “Mode 2”: old wine in new bottles? , 1997 .

[6]  Jerome R. Ravetz,et al.  Post-Normal Science and the complexity of transitions towards sustainability , 2006 .

[7]  S. Stead,et al.  Uncertainties and values in European aquaculture: communication, management and policy issues in times of “changing public perceptions” , 2002, Aquaculture International.

[8]  S. Bremer.  Have we given up too much? On yielding climate representation to experts , 2017 .

[9]  S. Bremer.  ‘No right to rubbish’: Mobilising post-normal science for planning Gisborne’s wastewater outfall , 2014 .

[10]  Maria Carmen Lemos,et al.  The co-production of science and policy in integrated climate assessments , 2003 .

[11]  Pier Paolo Roggero,et al.  Sustainable Catchment Managing in a Climate Changing World: New Integrative Modalities for Connecting Policy Makers, Scientists and Other Stakeholders , 2011 .

[12]  Eva Lövbrand,et al.  Co-producing European climate science and policy: a cautionary note on the making of useful knowledge , 2011 .

[13]  T. Spengler,et al.  Complementing Scientific Monsoon Definitions with Social Perception in Bangladesh , 2015 .

[14]  Synnøve Kvamme.  Evaluating Adaptive Governance in Northeast Bangladesh: A Case Study of the TRACKS Project , 2017 .

[15]  S. Jasanoff.  States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order , 2004 .

[16]  S. Bremer.  Mobilising High‐Quality Knowledge Through Dialogic Environmental Governance , 2010 .

[17]  J. Sluijs,et al.  Post-normal science in practice , 2017 .

[18]  Fikret Berkes,et al.  Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: Learning to adapt in Canada's Arctic , 2011 .

[19]  Arthur C. Petersen,et al.  Post-Normal Science in Practice at the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency , 2011, Science, technology & human values.

[20]  Carel Dieperink,et al.  Conceptualising joint knowledge production in regional climate change adaptation projects: success conditions and levers for action , 2012 .

[21]  S. Bremer,et al.  Co‐production in climate change research: reviewing different perspectives , 2017 .

[22]  Billie Turner,et al.  Vulnerability and resilience: Coalescing or paralleling approaches for sustainability science? , 2010 .

[23]  H. Z. Schuttenberg,et al.  Insight, part of a Special Feature on Science and Governance in a Diverse World: Coproduction and Coproductive Capacities for Environmental Management Seeking our shared wisdom: a framework for understanding knowledge coproduction and coproductive capacities , 2015 .

[24]  John Turnpenny,et al.  Where Now for Post-Normal Science?: A Critical Review of its Development, Definitions, and Uses , 2011 .

[25]  E. Tvinnereim,et al.  Narrative as a Method for Eliciting Tacit Knowledge of Climate Variability in Bangladesh , 2017 .

[26]  Diana Reckien,et al.  Weather extremes and street life in India—Implications of Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping as a new tool for semi-quantitative impact assessment and ranking of adaptation measures , 2014 .

[27]  David W. Cash,et al.  Knowledge systems for sustainable development , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[29]  Tamara U. Wall,et al.  Developing Evaluation Indicators to Improve the Process of Coproducing Usable Climate Science , 2017 .

[30]  M. Mahony.  Boundary spaces: Science, politics and the epistemic geographies of climate change in Copenhagen, 2009 , 2013 .

[31]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Negotiating a place for sustainability science: Narratives from the Waikaraka Estuary in New Zealand , 2015 .

[32]  Jeroen P. van der Sluijs,et al.  A way out of the credibility crisis of models used in integrated environmental assessment , 2002 .

[33]  Abhishek Nair,et al.  Livelihood vulnerability assessment to climate variability and change using fuzzy cognitive mapping approach , 2014, Climatic Change.

[34]  M. M. Haque,et al.  A critical assessment of knowledge quality for climate adaptation in Sylhet Division, Bangladesh , 2017 .

[35]  Anna Wesselink,et al.  If Post-Normal Science is the Solution, What is the Problem?: The Politics of Activist Environmental Science , 2011 .

[36]  M. Stiller-Reeve,et al.  A Climate for Art: Enhancing Scientist–Citizen Collaboration in Bangladesh , 2017 .

[37]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science for the Post-Normal Age , 1993, Commonplace.

[38]  T. Wall,et al.  Moving Toward the Deliberate Co-Production of Climate Science Knowledge , 2015 .

[39]  Nina-Marie E. Lister.  A Systems Approach to Biodiversity Conservation Planning , 1998 .

[40]  Martin O'Connor,et al.  Dialogue and debate in a post-normal practice of science: a reflexion , 1999 .

[41]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  The worth of a songbird: ecological economics as a post-normal science , 1994 .

[42]  Uygar Özesmi,et al.  Ecological models based on people’s knowledge: a multi-step fuzzy cognitive mapping approach , 2004 .

[43]  S. Yearley.  Making systematic sense of public discontents with expert knowledge: two analytical approaches and a case study , 2000 .

[44]  J. R. Ravets,et al.  Post-Normal Science , 2006 .

[45]  B. Frame,et al.  Developing post-normal technologies for sustainability , 2008 .

[46]  L. Tacconi,et al.  Scientific methodology for ecological economics , 1998 .

[47]  H. Geoghegan,et al.  Human geographies of climate change: Landscape, temporality, and lay knowledges , 2011 .

[48]  R. Swart,et al.  Science of adaptation to climate change and science for adaptation , 2014, Front. Environ. Sci..

[49]  Gisle Andersen,et al.  Harmful routines? Uncertainty in science and conflicting views on routine petroleum operations in Norway , 2014 .

[50]  I. Lorenzoni,et al.  Climate change, human genetics, and post-normality in the UK , 2007 .