A Numerical Method for Turbomachinery Aeroelasticity

This work provides an accurate and efficient numerical method for turbomachinery flutter. The unsteady Euler or Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations are solved in integral form, the blade passages being discretised using a background fixed C-grid and a body-fitted C-grid moving with the blade. In the overlapping region data are exchanged between the two grids at every time step, using bilinear interpolation. The method employs Roe’s second-order-accurate flux difference splitting scheme for the inviscid fluxes, a standard second-order discretisation of the viscous terms, and a three-level backward difference formula for the time derivatives. The state-of-the-art second-order accuracy of numerical methods for unsteady compressible flows with shocks is thus carried over, for the first time to the authors knowledge, to flutter computations. The dual time stepping technique is used to evaluate the nonlinear residual at each time step, thus extending to turbomachinery aeroelasticity the state-of-the-art efficiency of unsteady RANS solvers. The code is proven to be accurate and efficient by computing the 4th Aeroelastic Standard Configuration, namely, the subsonic flow through a turbine cascade with flutter instability in the first bending mode, where viscous effect are found practically negligible. Then, the very severe 11th Aeroelastic Standard Configuration is computed, namely, the transonic flow through a turbine cascade at off-design conditions, where the turbulence model is found to be the critical feature of the method.Copyright © 2002 by ASME

[1]  Mehmet Imregun,et al.  Linearized Unsteady Viscous Turbomachinery Flows Using Hybrid Grids , 2001 .

[2]  Max F. Platzer,et al.  A Navier–Stokes Analysis of the Stall Flutter Characteristics of the Buffum Cascade , 2000 .

[3]  A. Jameson,et al.  Numerical solution of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge Kutta time stepping schemes , 1981 .

[4]  Ismail H. Tuncer,et al.  Investigation of Periodic Boundary Conditions in Multi-Passage Cascade Flows Using Overset Grids , 1998 .

[5]  Shanhong Ji,et al.  Flutter Computation of Turbomachinery Cascades Using a Parallel Unsteady Navier-Stokes Code , 1999 .

[6]  T. Fransson,et al.  Viscuous and Inviscid Linear/Nonlinear Calculations Versus Quasi 3D Experimental Cascade Data For a New Aeroelastic Turbine Standard Configuration , 1998 .

[7]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Solution of the Euler equations for complex configurations , 1983 .

[8]  Torsten Fransson,et al.  Aeroelasticity in Turbomachines - Comparison of Theoretical and Experimental Cascade Results Communication , 1986 .

[9]  A. Jameson Time dependent calculations using multigrid, with applications to unsteady flows past airfoils and wings , 1991 .

[10]  V. Carstens,et al.  Computation of the Unsteady Transonic Flow in Harmonically Oscillating Turbine Cascades Taking into Account Viscous Effects , 1996 .

[11]  Ismail H. Tuncer,et al.  Investigation of Periodic Boundary Conditions in Multipassage Cascade Flows Using Overset Grids , 1999 .

[12]  P. Roe Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors, and Difference Schemes , 1997 .

[13]  J. Erdos,et al.  Numerical Solution of Periodic Transonic Flow through a Fan Stage , 1977 .

[14]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[15]  K. Hall Linearized unsteady aerodynamics , 1999 .

[16]  H. Lomax,et al.  Thin-layer approximation and algebraic model for separated turbulent flows , 1978 .

[17]  Reza S. Abhari,et al.  A Navier-Stokes analysis of airfoils in oscillating transonic cascades for the prediction of aerodynamic damping , 1997 .