WHO systematic review of randomised controlled trials of routine antenatal care

[1]  A Donner,et al.  Statistical methods for the meta-analysis of cluster randomization trials , 2001, Statistical methods in medical research.

[2]  Allan Donner,et al.  WHO antenatal care randomised trial for the evaluation of a new model of routine antenatal care , 2001, The Lancet.

[3]  G Piaggio,et al.  Methodological considerations on the design and analysis of an equivalence stratified cluster randomization trial. , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  Jonathan A C Sterne,et al.  Sifting the evidence—what's wrong with significance tests? , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  Allan Donner,et al.  Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research , 2001 .

[6]  J. Henderson,et al.  An Economic Evaluation Comparing Two Schedules of Antenatal Visits , 2000, Journal of health services research & policy.

[7]  N. Smeeton,et al.  Does reducing the frequency of routine antenatal visits have long term effects? Follow up of participants in a randomised controlled trial , 1999, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[8]  G. Piaggio,et al.  Methodological considerations in the design of the WHO Antenatal Care Randomised Controlled Trial. , 1998, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[9]  G. Smith,et al.  Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test , 1997, BMJ.

[10]  G. Piaggio,et al.  Factors affecting the comparability of meta-analyses and largest trials results in perinatology. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[11]  Jesse A Berlin,et al.  Does blinding of readers affect the results of meta-analyses? , 1997, The Lancet.

[12]  D. Koniak-Griffin,et al.  Evaluation of a reduced-frequency prenatal visit schedule for low-risk women at a free-standing birthing center. , 1997, Journal of nurse-midwifery.

[13]  R. Mcduffie,et al.  Effect of frequency of prenatal care visits on perinatal outcome among low-risk women , 1996 .

[14]  G. Lindmark,et al.  Randomised controlled trial of a reduced-visits programme of antenatal care in Harare, Zimbabwe , 1996, The Lancet.

[15]  J. Villar,et al.  Methodological issues of randomized controlled trials for the evaluation of reproductive health interventions. , 1996, Preventive medicine.

[16]  R. Mcduffie,et al.  Effect of frequency of prenatal care visits on perinatal outcome among low-risk women. A randomized controlled trial. , 1996, JAMA.

[17]  N. Smeeton,et al.  A randomised controlled trial comparing two schedules of antenatal visits: the antenatal care project , 1996, BMJ.

[18]  G. Wolde‐Tsadik,et al.  Alternative prenatal care. Impact of reduced visit frequency, focused visits and continuity of care. , 1995, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[19]  Diana B. Petitti,et al.  Meta-Analysis, Decision Analysis, and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Methods for Quantitative Synthesis in Medicine , 1994 .

[20]  F. Mosteller,et al.  Vitamin A supplementation and child mortality. A meta-analysis. , 1993, JAMA.

[21]  A Donner,et al.  Confidence interval construction for effect measures arising from cluster randomization trials. , 1993, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[22]  T C Chalmers,et al.  A comparison of statistical methods for combining event rates from clinical trials. , 1989, Statistics in medicine.

[23]  A. Sommer,et al.  VITAMIN A SUPPLEMENTATION AND CHILD MORTALITY , 1986, The Lancet.

[24]  D. Ridley,et al.  Cape Town, South Africa , 1986, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[25]  Jerome Cornfield,et al.  SYMPOSIUM ON CHD PREVENTION TRIALS: DESIGN ISSUES IN TESTING LIFE STYLE INTERVENTIONRANDOMIZATION BY GROUP: A FORMAL ANALYSIS , 1978 .

[26]  J Cornfield,et al.  Randomization by group: a formal analysis. , 1978, American journal of epidemiology.

[27]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .