COPYRIGHT PULSUS GROUP INC. – DO NOT COPY

1University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery,Toronto; 2McMaster University, McMaster University Medical Centre, Division of Plastic and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Hamilton, Ontario Correspondence: Dr Kevin Higgins, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Suite M1 102, Toronto, Ontario M4N 1J7. Telephone 416-480-5104, fax 416-480-5761, e-mail kevin.higgins@sunnybrook.ca The transfer of autogenous, vascularized free-tissue is a cornerstone of modern reconstructive surgery, particularly when dealing with extensive oncological ablations and large post-traumatic defects. A half-century after Jacobson and Suarez (1) described the first sutured microvascular anastomosis, the cumulative efforts of surgeons and researchers have refined free tissue transfer (FTT) into a reliable modality that often provides excellent cosmetic and functional results. In addition to adequate presurgical planning and meticulous dissection technique, the microvascular anastomosis is critically important for successful reconstruction. The reported success rate of FTT ranges from 91% to 99%, with the majority of failures being due to technical errors with vessel anastomosis (2). Indeed, a hand-sewn anastomosis is a technically demanding procedure, particularly when dealing with veins, which prompted investigation into alternative strategies to suture. One example is the microvascular anastomotic coupling device (MACD), an interlocking ring-pin design that is becoming more widely used in FTT. Initial animal studies demonstrated favourable tensile characteristics and healing of coupled vessels (3), and subsequent case series in head and neck, breast and limb reconstructive surgery have reported favourably on MACD utilization. These case series have been limited by smaller numbers and variability in reconstructive subsites; however, recently, several larger series have been published. We sought to systematically review the literature to examine the utility of MACD use in FTT with regard to success rates and optimal applications of this device.

[1]  T. Schoeller,et al.  1000 consecutive venous anastomoses using the microvascular anastomotic coupler in breast reconstruction. , 2010, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[2]  J. Nanchahal,et al.  Strategies to ensure success of microvascular free tissue transfer. , 2010, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[3]  I. Whitaker,et al.  Venous coupler for free-flap anastomosis: outcomes of 1,000 cases. , 2010, Anticancer research.

[4]  L. Gottlieb,et al.  Further Validation for Use of the Retrograde Limb of the Internal Mammary Vein in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction Using Laser-Assisted Indocyanine Green Angiography , 2009, Journal of reconstructive microsurgery.

[5]  O. Camara,et al.  Venous coupler for free-flap anastomosis. , 2009, Anticancer research.

[6]  C. Sasaki,et al.  End‐to‐Side Venous Anastomosis With an Anastomotic Coupling Device for Microvascular Free‐Tissue Transfer in Head and Neck Reconstruction , 2008, The Laryngoscope.

[7]  James M. Smartt,et al.  500 Consecutive Patients with Free TRAM Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Single Surgeon’s Experience , 2008, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[8]  D. Rice,et al.  Early experience with the new 'megacoupler' ring-pins for microvascular anastomoses. , 2008, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[9]  D. Enepekides,et al.  The utility of microvascular anastomotic devices in head and neck reconstruction , 2008, Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery.

[10]  Kao‐Ping Chang,et al.  Clinical Experience of a Microvascular Venous Coupler Device in Free Tissue Transfers , 2007, The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences.

[11]  C. Sasaki,et al.  Arterial coupling for microvascular free tissue transfer , 2007, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[12]  L. Yap,et al.  Venous Thrombosis in Coupled Versus Sutured Microvascular Anastomoses , 2006, Annals of plastic surgery.

[13]  M. A. Knight,et al.  Institutional Review of Free TRAM Flap Breast Reconstruction , 2006, Annals of plastic surgery.

[14]  J. Spector,et al.  Routine Use of Microvascular Coupling Device for Arterial Anastomosis in Breast Reconstruction , 2006, Annals of plastic surgery.

[15]  A. Boening,et al.  Long term angiographic monitoring reveals safety and efficacy of the Converge end-to-side anastomotic coupler. , 2005, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[16]  C. Sasaki,et al.  Arterial coupling for microvascular free tissue transfer in head and neck reconstruction. , 2005, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[17]  F. Arelli,et al.  [Mechanical microanastomosis in reconstructive surgery of the neck and face]. , 2005, I supplementi di Tumori : official journal of Societa italiana di cancerologia ... [et al.].

[18]  E. Rosenthal,et al.  Simplifying head and neck microvascular reconstruction , 2004, Head & neck.

[19]  S. Sullivan,et al.  Management of Significant Venous Discrepancy with Microvascular Venous Coupler , 2003, Journal of reconstructive microsurgery.

[20]  C. Zeebregts,et al.  Clinical experience with non-penetrating vascular clips in free-flap reconstructions. , 2002, British journal of plastic surgery.

[21]  Michael J. Miller,et al.  Technique And Clinical Experience Of The Unilink/3M® Microvascular Anastomotic Coupling Device In Free Flap Surgery. , 2000 .

[22]  U. Sinha,et al.  Use of a mechanical microvascular anastomotic device in head and neck free tissue transfer. , 1996, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[23]  M. Longaker,et al.  Microsurgical Reconstruction of the Lower Extremity Using the 3M Microvascular Coupling Device in Venous Anastomoses , 1995, Annals of plastic surgery.

[24]  T. Loree,et al.  Clinical experience with a microvascular anastomotic device in head and neck reconstruction. , 1995, American journal of surgery.

[25]  C. Ahn,et al.  Clinical Experience with the 3M Microvascular Coupling Anastomotic Device in 100 Free‐Tissue Transfers , 1994, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[26]  Gang Zhou,et al.  Experience using microvascular anastomotic rings for the transplantation of 20 free flaps. , 1989, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[27]  R. Pommier,et al.  Delayed removal of 3M® vein coupler does not disturb the anastomosis , 2009, Microsurgery.

[28]  K. Marck,et al.  Coupling the venous anastomosis: Safe and simple , 1996, Microsurgery.

[29]  L. Ostrup,et al.  Clinical experience with the Unilink/3M Precise microvascular anastomotic device. , 1993, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.

[30]  L. Östrup,et al.  Strength of microvascular anastomoses: Comparison between the unilink anastomotic system and sutures , 1989, Microsurgery.

[31]  Jacobs Jh,et al.  Microsurgery in anastomosis of small vessels. , 1960 .