Managing Outsourced Product Design: The Effectiveness of Alternative Integration Mechanisms

Many firms have moved from outsourcing only manufacturing and staff support activities (e.g., janitorial services) to outsourcing more complex and central activities such as product and process development. Outsourcing these more complex, nuanced, and time-sensitive activities increases the difficulties of coordinating with suppliers. We examine the frequency with which firms use various interorganizational integration mechanisms and project coordination tools to coordinate outsourced product development. We further examine the impact of these mechanisms and tools on project performance. We report descriptive and some preliminary regression statistics from the first three years of a four-year multi-firm, multi-industry research project. These preliminary results suggest that nearly all firms employ personnel dedicated to managing the outsourcing relationship. However, firms also use other integration modalities concomitantly. Specifically, firms initially rely on ad hoc face-to-face communication rather than co-location to manage the interface with outsourcing partners. However, over time, firms move to co-location to manage relationships with non-domestic suppliers. Surprisingly, firms make relatively little use of either sophisticated information technology or modular product designs. We find that the effects of a single integration mechanism or tool can vary dramatically across different outcomes. For example, co-locating employees appears to improve product quality but are associated with poor schedule peformance. Given the frequency with which firms employ dedicated individuals to manage the interface, we also present some preliminary evidence on the skills and training of these individuals; this evidence suggests that (1) they have received little formal training in key skills and that firms rely solely on experiential learning to train these individuals and (2) for the training they have received, whether they received it from their university training or from company-sponsored initiatives may have differential effects on project outcomes.

[1]  Fred P. Brooks,et al.  The Mythical Man-Month , 1975, Reliable Software.

[2]  Timothy J. Sturgeon,et al.  Modular production networks: a new American model of industrial organization , 2002 .

[3]  A. Griffin PDMA Research on New Product Development Practices: Updating Trends and Benchmarking Best Practices , 1997 .

[4]  Marvin B. Lieberman,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF VERTICAL INTEGRATION: AN EMPIRICAL TEST. , 1991 .

[5]  M. Gerlach,et al.  The Japanese Corporate Network: A Blockmodel Analysis , 1992 .

[6]  Jack A. Nickerson,et al.  A Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm - A Problem-solving Perspective , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[7]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[8]  花枝 英樹,et al.  Oliver E.Williamson;Markets and Hierarchies:Analysis and Antitrust Implications , 1976 .

[9]  R. Handfield,et al.  Involving Suppliers in New Product Development , 1999 .

[10]  R. V. Hoek Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage , 2000 .

[11]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[12]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Sloan School of Management Working Paper Factors That Influence Technical Communication in Distributed Product Development: an Empirical Study in the Telecommunications Industry Factors That Influence Technical Communication in Distributed Product Development: an Empirical Study in the Telecommunica , 2022 .

[13]  P. Kidwell,et al.  The mythical man-month: Essays on software engineering , 1996, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing.

[14]  Kirk Monteverde,et al.  You have printed the following article : Supplier Switching Costs and Vertical Integration in the Automobile Industry , 2007 .

[15]  R. Keller,et al.  Technology-Information Processing Fit and the Performance of R&D Project Groups: A Test of Contingency Theory , 1994 .

[16]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  How the Incumbent Can Win: Managing Technological Transitions in the Semiconductor Industry.: Managing Technological Transitions in the Semiconductor Industry. , 2000 .

[17]  Jay R. Galbraith Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[18]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  Technology Integration: Making Critical Choices in a Dynamic World , 1997 .

[19]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  Technology development and integration: an empirical study of the interaction between applied science and product development , 1995 .

[20]  Melissa A. Schilling Toward a General Modular Systems Theory and Its Application to Interfirm Product Modularity , 2000 .

[21]  J. Liker,et al.  Collaborating with suppliers in product development: a US and Japan comparative study , 1999 .

[22]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  Technology integration: Managing technological evolution in a complex environment , 1995 .

[23]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .

[24]  Deborah G. . Ancona Outward Bound: Strategic for Team Survival in an Organization , 1990 .

[25]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[26]  Charles H. Fine,et al.  Is The Make/Buy Decision a Core Competence? , 2004 .

[27]  Stuart E. Madnick,et al.  Software Project Dynamics: An Integrated Approach , 1991 .

[28]  Ram Narasimhan,et al.  Purchasing Competence and Its Relationship with Manufacturing Performance , 2000 .

[29]  M. Cusumano,et al.  Supplier relations and management: A survey of Japanese, Japanese-transplant, and U. S. auto plants , 1991 .

[30]  Marie McHugh,et al.  Partnership Sourcing: An Organization Change Management Perspective , 2000 .

[31]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  FROM BUYER TO INTEGRATOR: THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE SUPPLY‐CHAIN MANAGER IN THE VERTICALLY DISINTEGRATING FIRM , 2002 .