The Role of Social Comments in Problem-Solving Groups in an Online Class

This grounded theory article focuses on the role of social communications during an online group problem-solving class. The proposed theory states that students working collaboratively and asynchronously with people they do not know use social comments to overcome emotional and geographical distance feelings. The subthemes of self-revelation, tying, and etiquette enabled students to "connect" to group members, group process, and the learning content. The contextual subtheme of technology provided a framework for messages. Social commentary constructed a foundation for problem-solving activities. Instructors are encouraged to consider enhancing social connections as a means of accomplishing primary course objectives.

[1]  Cornelia Boldyreff,et al.  Student collaboration across universities: a case study in software engineering , 2000, Thirteenth Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training.

[2]  Michael Meyer,et al.  Methods of text and discourse analysis , 2000 .

[3]  Terry Anderson,et al.  Exploring Social Communication in Computer Conferencing , 2002 .

[4]  Zane Robinson Wolf,et al.  From Practice to Grounded Theory: Qualitative Research in Nursing , 1987 .

[5]  Charalambos Vrasidas,et al.  Factors influencing interaction in an online course , 1999 .

[6]  Deana Molinari.  Online Group Processing: A Qualitative Study , 2001 .

[7]  Lars Svensson,et al.  Team, Troop, Gang & Crowd: Collaborative Work in Distance Education , 2000, WebNet.

[8]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Decision development in small groups II: A study of multiple sequences in decision making 1 , 1983 .

[9]  C. Gunawardena,et al.  Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer‐mediated conferencing environment , 1997 .

[10]  P. Dillenbourg,et al.  A computational approach to socially distributed cognition , 1992 .

[11]  Muhammad K. Betz.  Distance Education : A Systems View , 2005 .

[12]  D. Garrison,et al.  Assessing Social Presence In Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing , 1999 .

[13]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Learning Together and Alone. Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. Fourth Edition. , 1991 .

[14]  Edward Barrett.  Collaboration in the Electronic Classroom. , 1993 .

[15]  M. O'Reilly,et al.  Interaction online: Above and beyond requirements of assessment , 2002 .

[16]  C. Colbeck,et al.  Grouping in the Dark , 2000 .

[17]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Decision Development in Computer-Assisted Group Decision Making , 1995 .

[18]  M. S. Poole,et al.  Decision Development in Small Groups V: Test of a Contingency Model. , 1989 .

[19]  Cornelia Boldyreff,et al.  Student group working across universities: a case study in software engineering , 2000, IEEE Trans. Educ..

[20]  C. Boyd,et al.  CHENITZ, W.C., AND SWANSON, J. M. (1986). From Practice to Grounded Theory: Qualitative Research in Nursing Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley , 1989 .

[21]  Fay Sudweeks,et al.  How Do You Get a Hundred Strangers to Agree: Computer mediated communication and collaboration , 1996 .

[22]  Steven M. Crooks,et al.  Effects of Cooperative and Individual Learning during Learner-Controlled Computer-Based Instruction , 1998 .

[23]  Joanne Tornow.  Link/age : composing in the online classroom , 1998 .

[24]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Decision development in small groups I: A comparison of two models , 1981 .

[25]  Naomi Boyer,et al.  Building online learning: System insights into group learning in an international online environment , 2001 .