Quantitative Assessments of Runway Excursion Precursors using Mode S data.

A way to assess rare aircraft incidents (e.g., runway excursion) is to identify contributing factors (e.g., late braking, long landing, inappropriate flare, unstable approach) and to build a dependency tree (e.g., long landing may be the result of an unstable approach not followed by a go around) that describes the causality between these factors. Probabilities are then fed into such models in order to evaluate the assessed risk. When estimating such probabilities, many sources can be of interest. Airlines have access to the comprehensive flight data records of their fleet; manufacturers push to collect data for the aircraft they build; air traffic control log radar tracks. Albeit not as complete as other flight data records, Mode S data is very attractive, esp. for academics, as the data is open, may be published without obfuscation and offers reproducible results to the community. Mode S also provides an indiscriminate source of information (not limited to an airline or to an aircraft type) that is of great help for putting in context flights matching unusual patterns. We propose to discuss the advantages and limitations of an analysis based only on Mode S data with a case study around the runway excursion risk assessment.

[1]  E. K. Stone,et al.  A Network of Mode-S Receivers for Routine Acquisition of Aircraft-Derived Meteorological Data , 2016 .

[2]  Yu Zheng,et al.  Trajectory Data Mining , 2015, ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol..

[3]  H. Hotelling Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. , 1933 .

[4]  Makis Stamatelatos,et al.  Fault tree handbook with aerospace applications , 2002 .

[5]  B. Silverman,et al.  Functional Data Analysis , 1997 .

[6]  Ivan Martinovic,et al.  Bringing up OpenSky: A large-scale ADS-B sensor network for research , 2014, IPSN-14 Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.

[7]  Richard DeLaura,et al.  Trajectory Clustering and Classification for Characterization of Air Traffic Flows , 2016 .

[8]  C. Halford,et al.  ASIAS: Aviation Safety Information Analysis and sharing , 2008, 2008 IEEE/AIAA 27th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[9]  Lance Sherry,et al.  Airspace risk management using surveillance track data: Stabilized approaches , 2015, 2015 Integrated Communication, Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS).

[10]  Joost Ellerbroek,et al.  Modeling aircraft performance parameters with open ADS-B data , 2017 .

[11]  Washington Y. Ochieng,et al.  Identifying significant traffic flow patterns in Multi-Airport Systems Terminal Manoeuvring Areas under uncertainty , 2016 .

[12]  Ashok N. Srivastava,et al.  Multiple kernel learning for heterogeneous anomaly detection: algorithm and aviation safety case study , 2010, KDD.

[13]  L. Sherry,et al.  Big data analysis of irregular operations: Aborted approaches and their underlying factors , 2013, 2013 Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS).

[14]  Karl Pearson F.R.S. LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space , 1901 .

[15]  Joram Verstraeten,et al.  The Risk Observatory: Developing an Aviation Safety Information Sharing Platform in Europe , 2016 .

[16]  Florence Nicol,et al.  Functional principal component analysis of aircraft trajectories , 2013 .

[17]  Barry KIRWAN,et al.  A SYSTEMIC MODEL OF ATM SAFETY: THE INTEGRATED RISK PICTURE , 2007 .

[18]  Siebren de Haan,et al.  Estimates of Mode-S EHS aircraft-derived wind observation errors using triple collocation , 2015 .

[19]  Sherry Borener,et al.  Safety Assessment of Implemented NextGen Operational Improvements , 2016 .

[20]  Joost Ellerbroek,et al.  Ground-based Wind Field Construction from Mode-S and ADS-B Data with a Novel Gas Particle Model , 2017 .