NLM: network-based layered multicast for traffic control of heterogeneous network

Layered multicast has been considered to be an efficient approach for coping with the network heterogeneity. Receiver-driven Layered Multicast (RLM) and its variants suggest that every receiver adjusts the reception level based on the packet loss rate. In this paper we propose a scheme called network-based layered multicast (NLM) scheme, which enhances the packet scoping mechanism employed in current multicast backbone (MBone). It makes use of the TTL bits and TOS bits in IP header, and packets are filtered in the routers using both the measured and predicted traffic condition. This allows the network quickly and efficiently adapts to the traffic condition. We evaluate and compare the scheme with the receiver-driven schemes using Network Simulator for a 33-node network topology with realistic bandwidths. The simulation reveals that the proposed NLM scheme substantially improves the stability and fairness of the RLM scheme for multicast sessions, while it displays comparable performance to the RLM with Priority (RLMP) scheme. For mixed type traffic of multicast and TCP sessions, it outperforms both the schemes.

[1]  Scott Shenker,et al.  Uniform versus priority dropping for layered video , 1998, SIGCOMM '98.

[2]  David L. Black,et al.  Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS Field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers , 1998, RFC.

[3]  Jean-Jacques Pansiot,et al.  On routes and multicast trees in the Internet , 1998, CCRV.

[4]  Cormac J. Sreenan,et al.  Stability and Fairness Issues in Layered Multicast , 1999 .

[5]  Martin Vetterli,et al.  Receiver-driven layered multicast , 1996, SIGCOMM 1996.

[6]  Xue Li,et al.  Layered video multicast with retransmission (LVMR): evaluation of error recovery schemes , 1997, Proceedings of 7th International Workshop on Network and Operating System Support for Digital Audio and Video (NOSSDAV '97).

[7]  K. K. Ramakrishnan,et al.  A Proposal to add Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) to IP , 1999, RFC.

[8]  Jon Postel,et al.  Internet Control Message Protocol , 1981, RFC.

[9]  Rajendra Yavatkar,et al.  Optimistic strategies for large-scale dissemination of multimedia information , 1993, MULTIMEDIA '93.

[10]  Steven McCanne,et al.  A layered DCT coder for Internet video , 1996, Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[11]  Mostafa H. Ammar,et al.  On the use of destination set grouping to improve fairness in multicast video distribution , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM '96. Conference on Computer Communications.

[12]  Michael R. Macedonia,et al.  MBone provides audio and video across the Internet , 1994, Computer.

[13]  Ian Wakeman,et al.  Scalable feedback control for multicast video distribution in the Internet , 1994, SIGCOMM 1994.

[14]  Cormac J. Sreenan,et al.  A simple loss differentiation approach to layered multicast , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).

[15]  Mostafa Ammar,et al.  Inter-Receiver Fair Multicast Communication over the Internet , 1999 .

[16]  Henning Schulzrinne,et al.  Dynamic QoS control of multimedia applications based on RTP , 1996, Comput. Commun..

[17]  Stephen E. Deering,et al.  Host extensions for IP multicasting , 1986, RFC.

[18]  Kyungran Kang,et al.  Scalable Traffic Control Scheme for Interactive Multimedia Sessions , 1999 .