Visually decomposing vehicle images: Exploring the influence of different aesthetic features on consumer perception of brand

This paper presents a technique to investigate the influence of aesthetic features and brand recognition of vehicles. Appearance has been shown to impact greatly on consumer perception of products and their branding, yet there exist few tools or methods to support reasoning about their influence. A procedure for visually decomposing designs into constituent aesthetic features is proposed. The strategy is applied to a range of saloon cars, and a consumer survey undertaken to establish the significance and potency of individual aesthetic features. Results both validate the decomposition technique and highlight certain aesthetic features that have the greatest influence on brand recognition.

[1]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Capturing a rebel: modeling the Harley-Davidson brand through a motorcycle shape grammar , 2002 .

[2]  Jay McCormack,et al.  Speaking the Buick Language: Capturing, Understanding, and Exploring Brand Identity With Shape Grammars , 2004 .

[3]  Anders WARELL,et al.  Towards a Theory-Based Method for Evaluation of Visual Form Syntactics , 2004 .

[4]  Robert Kreuzbauer,et al.  Embodied Cognition and New Product Design: Changing Product Form to Influence Brand Categorization , 2005 .

[5]  Vincent Cheutet,et al.  Preserving car stylists’ design intent through an ontology , 2006 .

[6]  Dirk Snelders,et al.  Should new products look similar or different?The influence of the market environment on strategic product styling , 2008 .

[7]  T. Karjalainen,et al.  Strategic Brand Identity and Symbolic Design Cues , 2003 .

[8]  David Robertson,et al.  Product development performance: Strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry , 1992 .

[9]  Anders Warell,et al.  Visual product identity: Understanding identity perceptions conveyed by visual product design. , 2006 .

[10]  Paola Cillo,et al.  Convergent designs in fine fashion: An evolutionary model for stylistic innovation , 2006 .

[11]  N. F. M. Roozenburg,et al.  Product design: Fundamentals and methods , 1996 .

[12]  D. Kehoe,et al.  Factors affecting the implementation and success of TQM , 1995 .

[13]  Anders Warell.  Design Syntactics: A Functional Approach to Visual Product Form – Theory, Models, and Methods , 2001 .

[14]  Michael Joseph French,et al.  Conceptual Design for Engineers , 1985 .

[15]  Toni-Matti Karjalainen,et al.  Semantic Transformation in Design.Communicating Strategic Brand Identity through Product Design References , 2004 .

[16]  I. Biederman,et al.  Surface versus edge-based determinants of visual recognition , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  Steve Garner,et al.  Shape exploration of designs in a style: Toward generation of product designs , 2006, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[18]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[19]  Robert Newman,et al.  Sketching, concept development and automotive design , 2003 .

[20]  Stefan H. Thomke.  Managing digital design at BMW , 2010 .

[21]  Anil Gupta,et al.  Managing global expansion: A conceptual framework , 2000 .

[22]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[23]  Paul Charles Cleveland,et al.  Style Based Automated Graphic Layouts , 2010 .

[24]  Andre Liem,et al.  Designers' perceptions of typical characteristics of form treatment in automobile styling , 2009 .

[25]  I. Biederman.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[26]  P. Clarkson,et al.  Design as communication: exploring the validity and utility of relating intention to interpretation , 2008 .

[27]  Anil Khurana,et al.  Quality function deployment: total quality management for new product design , 1995 .

[28]  Gerd Podehl.  TERMS AND MEASURES FOR STYLING PROPERTIES , 2002 .

[29]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified , 1990 .

[30]  Peter H. Bloch.  Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response , 1995 .

[31]  M. Holbrook.  Aims, Concepts, and Methods for the Representation of Individual Differences in Esthetic Responses to Design Features , 1986 .

[32]  Toni-Matti Karjalainen,et al.  Educational Approaches to Designing for Visual Brand Recognition , 2007 .

[33]  P. Herr,et al.  An Investigation of the Processes by Which Product Design and Brand Strength Interact to Determine Initial Affect and Quality Judgments , 2002 .

[34]  Stephen Bayley,et al.  Raymond Loewy: Pioneer of American Industrial Design , 1990 .

[35]  Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller.  Design of studies , 2001 .