This work aims to further promote the research and development of flexible damping technology for the seismic damage control of underground engineering structures. On the basis of the understanding of the application of viscoelastic damping theory to the field of earthquake resistance of bridge buildings, impact tests on different rock damping layer– concrete specimens are conducted using the improved split Hopkinson pressure bar test system to analyze the energy absorption characteristics of the viscoelastic damping layers. A comparative analysis of the test results is also performed to differentiate the laws of energy absorption of the viscoelastic damping layer structure using different damping layer materials (rubber and silicone) and different damping layer shapes (honeycomb, corrugated, and cylindrical). Given damping layers with the same material and structure, the energy absorption laws of the structures with different damping layer thicknesses are compared and analyzed. The optimal thickness of the damping layers is also discussed. Results show that the incident energy absorbed by the damping layers of different materials increases by more than 10% relative to the control group (rock–concrete specimen). Such an increase indicates that the structures have superior energy absorption characteristics and that the rubber material can absorb more incident energy than the high-damping silicone as the damping layer. As for the damping layer shapes, the composite damping layer structure with a honeycomb shape achieves the best energy absorption among all structures. The comparison and analysis of the energy absorption effects when the damping layer thicknesses are 10, 20, and 25 mm reveal that a 20 mm-thick damping layer shows the best energy absorption effect. The current findings can provide theoretical foundation and data support for the application of composite damping layers to the seismic design of underground engineering structures.
[1]
Zhao Yong,et al.
Statistics of Railway Tunnels in China as of 2017(截至2017年底中国铁路隧道情况统计)
,
2018
.
[2]
Yujing Jiang,et al.
Seismic damage assessment of mountain tunnel: A case study on the Tawarayama tunnel due to the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake
,
2018
.
[3]
Yan Qixiang,et al.
Shaking table test for tunnel with shock absorption layer though fault zone
,
2013
.
[4]
Tianbin Li,et al.
Damage to mountain tunnels related to the Wenchuan earthquake and some suggestions for aseismic tunnel construction
,
2012,
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment.
[5]
Song Yuan,et al.
Investigation and assessment on mountain tunnels and geotechnical damage after the Wenchuan earthquake
,
2009
.
[6]
Chris Jones,et al.
A tuned damping device for reducing noise from railway track
,
2007
.
[7]
Li Ming.
ANISOTROPIC DESIGN AND ITS DAMPING ANALYSIS OF LAMINATED DAMPED STRUCTURE
,
2002
.
[8]
Zeng Zhi-bin,et al.
Vibration-suppression Technology of Visco-elastic Damping Materials and Its Application to Bridges
,
2002
.