The paradox of public acceptance of bike sharing in Gothenburg

Bike sharing is one of the most promising urban planning interventions to facilitate an all-necessary transition towards a more sustainable transport paradigm. Regardless of the fact that hundreds of schemes run in more than 50 countries worldwide, bike sharing is still moderately investigated by research. This paper reports on a primarily quantitative study of 558 responses that was set to frame attitudes reflecting public acceptance towards the rapidly expanding bike-sharing scheme in Gothenburg (Styr & Stall), in an attempt to identify the ‘formula for success’. The respondents generally believed that Styr & Stall is a pro-environmental, inexpensive and healthy transport mode, which complements the city’s public transport services and promotes a more human-friendly identity for Gothenburg. Even the respondents that self-reported a small (or no) likelihood to use bike sharing were positive towards the scheme. This means that they recognise that bike sharing has a significant pro-social potential and is not a system favouring a particular road-user segment over others that might not be interested or able to use it. The fact that the majority of the respondents do not use the scheme and yet its popularity is still vast indicates that there is much potential for more use in real terms.

[1]  Simon Washington,et al.  Factors influencing bike share membership : an analysis of Melbourne and Brisbane , 2015 .

[2]  J. Urry,et al.  The City and the Car , 2000 .

[3]  Tom Petersen,et al.  Optimising Bike Sharing in European Cities - A Handbook , 2011 .

[4]  Anna Goodman,et al.  The role of bicycle sharing systems in normalising the image of cycling: An observational study of London cyclists , 2014, Journal of transport & health.

[5]  Ulrike Rahe,et al.  Public Bicycles: How the Concept of Human-Oriented “Mobility Sharing” Technology Can Influence Travel Behaviour Norms and Reshape Design Education , 2014 .

[6]  Simon Washington,et al.  Bike Share: A Synthesis of the Literature , 2013 .

[7]  Erel Avineri,et al.  Older people's attitudes to road charging: are they distinctive and what are the implications for policy? , 2011 .

[8]  Tal Raviv,et al.  Static repositioning in a bike-sharing system: models and solution approaches , 2013, EURO J. Transp. Logist..

[9]  A. Ibeas,et al.  Implementing bike-sharing systems , 2011 .

[10]  Simon Washington,et al.  Bike share's impact on car use: evidence from the United States, Great Britain, and Australia , 2014 .

[11]  J. Pucher,et al.  Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: an international review. , 2010, Preventive medicine.

[12]  P. DeMaio.  Bike-sharing: History, Impacts, Models of Provision, and Future , 2009 .

[13]  Ahmed M El-Geneidy,et al.  Better Understanding of Factors Influencing Likelihood of Using Shared Bicycle Systems and Frequency of Use , 2012 .

[14]  R. Shephard.  Use of a New Public Bicycle Share Program in Montreal, Canada , 2012 .

[15]  Pontus Wallgren,et al.  Bike-sharing: is safety an issue adversely affecting its potential for being embraced by urban societies? , 2014 .

[16]  Esther Anaya,et al.  Chapter 11 Private Interventions in a Public Service: An Analysis of Public Bicycle Schemes , 2012 .

[17]  Simon Washington,et al.  Barriers and facilitators to public bicycle scheme use : a qualitative approach , 2012 .

[18]  Susan Shaheen,et al.  Public Bikesharing in North America: Early Operator and User Understanding , 2012 .

[19]  Luc Int Panis,et al.  Improving health through policies that promote active travel: a review of evidence to support integrated health impact assessment. , 2011, Environment international.

[20]  L. Steg,et al.  Promoting physical activity and reducing climate change: opportunities to replace short car trips with active transportation. , 2009, Preventive medicine.

[21]  J. Pucher,et al.  Bicycling renaissance in North America? An update and re-appraisal of cycling trends and policies , 2011 .

[22]  Maria Bordagaray,et al.  Modeling User Perception of Public Bicycle Services , 2012 .

[23]  P. Vergragt,et al.  Sustainable mobility: from technological innovation to societal learning , 2007 .

[24]  Michelle Daley,et al.  All Dressed Up and Nowhere to Go?: A Qualitative Research Study of the Barriers and Enablers to Cycling in Inner Sydney , 2007 .