Performance comparison of constant envelope and zero-forcing precoders in multiuser massive MIMO

In this article, the adoption and performance of a constant envelope (CE) type spatial precoder is addressed in large-scale multiuser MIMO based cellular network. We first formulate an efficient computing solution to obtain the antenna samples of such CE precoder. We then evaluate the achievable CE precoder based multiuser downlink (DL) system performance and compare it with the corresponding performance of more ordinary zero-forcing (ZF) spatial precoder. We specifically also analyze how realistic highly nonlinear power amplifiers (PAs) affect the achievable DL performance, as the individual PA units in largearray or massive MIMO systems are expected to be small, cheap and operating close to saturation for increased energy-efficiency purposes. It is shown that the largely reduced peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) of the PA input signals in the CE precoder based system allows for pushing the PA units harsher towards saturation, while allowing to reach higher signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINRs) at the intended receivers compared to the classical ZF precoder based system. The obtained results indicate that the CE precoder can outperform the ZF precoder by up to 5–6 dBs, in terms of the achievable SINRs, when the PA units are pushed towards their saturating region. Such large gains are a substantial benefit when seeking to improve the spectral and energy-efficiencies of the mobile cellular networks.

[1]  Kai-Kit Wong,et al.  Improved Constant Envelope Multiuser Precoding for Massive MIMO Systems , 2014, IEEE Communications Letters.

[2]  Vincenzo Mancuso,et al.  Reducing costs and pollution in cellular networks , 2011, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[3]  Erik G. Larsson,et al.  Constant-Envelope Multi-User Precoding for Frequency-Selective Massive MIMO Systems , 2013, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[4]  Saif K. Mohammed,et al.  Constant-Envelope Precoding With Time-Variation Constraint on the Transmitted Phase Angles , 2014, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[5]  Vincent K. N. Lau,et al.  Two-Stage Constant-Envelope Precoding for Low-Cost Massive MIMO Systems , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[6]  Erik G. Larsson,et al.  Per-Antenna Constant Envelope Precoding for Large Multi-User MIMO Systems , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[7]  Wing-Kin Ma,et al.  Constant Envelope Precoding for Single-User Large-Scale MISO Channels: Efficient Precoding and Optimal Designs , 2014, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[8]  Seung Hee Han,et al.  An overview of peak-to-average power ratio reduction techniques for multicarrier transmission , 2005, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[9]  A. Lee Swindlehurst,et al.  A vector-perturbation technique for near-capacity multiantenna multiuser communication-part I: channel inversion and regularization , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[10]  Erik G. Larsson,et al.  Scaling Up MIMO: Opportunities and Challenges with Very Large Arrays , 2012, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[11]  Cicek Cavdar,et al.  5GrEEn: Towards Green 5G mobile networks , 2013, 2013 IEEE 9th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob).