A novel $$\hbox {CACO}_{\mathrm{R}}$$CACOR-SVR multi-objective optimization approach and its application in aerodynamic shape optimization of high-speed train

A chaos ant colony optimization algorithm for continuous domain is proposed based on chaos optimization theory and ant colony optimization algorithm. The searching abilities of optimization algorithms with different coding methods are compared, and the results indicate that the proposed algorithm has better performance than genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization algorithm. Based on the non-dominated sorting concept and niching method, a multi-objective chaos ant colony optimization algorithm is also constructed and numerical results show that the improved algorithm performs well at solving multi-objective optimization problems. An optimal support vector regression model based on radial basis kernel function is developed for the small sample size and nonlinear characteristics of streamlined head optimization. On the basis of the above work, a multi-objective optimization design for the aerodynamic head shape of high-speed train is developed using a modified vehicle modeling function parametric approach. The optimization results demonstrate that the new optimization design method has exceptional searching abilities and high prediction accuracy. After optimization, the aerodynamic drag of the simplified train with three carriages is reduced by 10.52% and the aerodynamic lift of the tail car is reduced by 35.70%. The optimization approach proposed in the present paper is simple yet efficient and sheds light on the engineering design of aerodynamic shape of high-speed trains.

[1]  Hong-qi Tian Formation mechanism of aerodynamic drag of high-speed train and some reduction measures , 2009 .

[2]  Xiaodong Li,et al.  A Non-dominated Sorting Particle Swarm Optimizer for Multiobjective Optimization , 2003, GECCO.

[3]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[4]  Leifur Þ. Leifsson,et al.  Surrogate-Based Aerodynamic Shape Optimization by Variable-Resolution Models , 2013 .

[5]  Frank Kursawe,et al.  A Variant of Evolution Strategies for Vector Optimization , 1990, PPSN.

[6]  Kazuyuki Aihara,et al.  Theory and Applications of Chaotic Optimization Methods , 2011, Innovative Computing Methods and Their Applications to Engineering Problems.

[7]  David W. Coit,et al.  Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms: A tutorial , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[8]  K. Lee,et al.  A new meta-heuristic algorithm for continuous engineering optimization: harmony search theory and practice , 2005 .

[9]  Alexandros Iosifidis,et al.  Multi-class Support Vector Machine classifiers using intrinsic and penalty graphs , 2016, Pattern Recognit..

[10]  James Kennedy,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 1995, Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks.

[11]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[12]  Guowei Yang,et al.  Aerodynamic design for China new high-speed trains , 2012 .

[13]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Comparison of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: Empirical Results , 2000, Evolutionary Computation.

[14]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  Evolutionary multi-objective optimization: a historical view of the field , 2006, IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag..

[15]  Mauricio G. C. Resende,et al.  A hybrid genetic algorithm for the job shop scheduling problem , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Jing J. Liang,et al.  Comprehensive learning particle swarm optimizer for global optimization of multimodal functions , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[17]  Christopher Baker,et al.  The flow around high speed trains , 2010 .

[18]  Katherine Maschmeyer,et al.  Improving Genetic Algorithm Efficiency with an Artificial Neural Network for Optimization of Low Reynolds Number Airfoils , 2009 .

[19]  Jiri Blazek,et al.  Computational Fluid Dynamics: Principles and Applications , 2001 .

[20]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Kriging Models for Global Approximation in Simulation-Based Multidisciplinary Design Optimization , 2001 .

[21]  Liqiang Liu,et al.  Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm for Continuous Domains Based on Position Distribution Model of Ant Colony Foraging , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[22]  Xin-She Yang,et al.  Solving Computationally Expensive Engineering Problems: Methods and Applications , 2014 .

[23]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  A tutorial on support vector regression , 2004, Stat. Comput..

[24]  Javier García,et al.  Genetically aerodynamic optimization of the nose shape of a high-speed train entering a tunnel , 2014 .

[25]  Sung Wook Baik,et al.  Neural network modeling of inter-characteristics of silicon nitride film deposited by using a plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[26]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization , 2009 .

[27]  Marco Dorigo,et al.  Ant colony optimization for continuous domains , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[29]  Toshiaki Setoguchi,et al.  Aerodynamics of high-speed railway train , 2002 .

[30]  Shuang Cong,et al.  An improved algorithm of chaos optimization , 2010, IEEE ICCA 2010.

[31]  Lalit M. Patnaik,et al.  Adaptive probabilities of crossover and mutation in genetic algorithms , 1994, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[32]  Marco Dorigo,et al.  Optimization, Learning and Natural Algorithms , 1992 .

[33]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[34]  Rituparna Datta,et al.  A surrogate-assisted evolution strategy for constrained multi-objective optimization , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[35]  Dong-Ho Lee,et al.  Development of a Vehicle Modeling Function for Three-Dimensional Shape Optimization , 2009 .

[36]  Alexander J. Smola,et al.  Support Vector Regression Machines , 1996, NIPS.

[37]  V. R. Joseph,et al.  ORTHOGONAL-MAXIMIN LATIN HYPERCUBE DESIGNS , 2008 .

[38]  J.-M. Bourinet,et al.  Rare-event probability estimation with adaptive support vector regression surrogates , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[39]  Robert M. May,et al.  Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics , 1976, Nature.