Public knowledge and confidence in the use of public access defibrillation

Introduction Growing numbers of public access defibrillators aim to improve the effectiveness of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation prior to ambulance arrival. In the UK, however, public access defibrillators are only deployed successfully in 1.7% of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. We aimed to understand whether this was due to a lack of devices, lack of awareness of their location or a reflection of lack of public knowledge and confidence to use a defibrillator. Methods Face-to-face semistructured open quantitative questionnaire delivered in a busy urban shopping centre, to identify public knowledge relating to public access defibrillation. Results 1004 members of the public aged 9–90 years completed the survey. 61.1% had been first aid trained to a basic life support level. 69.3% claimed to know what an automatic external defibrillator was and 26.1% reported knowing how to use one. Only 5.1% knew where or how to find their nearest public access defibrillator. Only 3.3% of people would attempt to locate a defibrillator in a cardiac arrest situation, and even fewer (2.1%) would actually retrieve and use the device. Conclusions These findings suggest that a lack of public knowledge, confidence in using a defibrillator and the inability to locate a nearby device may be more important than a lack of defibrillators themselves. Underused public access defibrillation is a missed opportunity to save lives, and improving this link in the chain of survival may require these issues to be addressed ahead of investing more funds in actual defibrillator installation.

[1]  J. Bache European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation , 1998 .

[2]  Gavin D Perkins,et al.  European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 4. Adult advanced life support. , 2010, Resuscitation.

[3]  S. Loer,et al.  Public access defibrillation: time to access the public. , 2011, Annals of emergency medicine.

[4]  C. Deakin,et al.  Public access defibrillation remains out of reach for most victims of out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest , 2014, Heart.

[5]  S. Pocock,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies , 2007, The Lancet.

[6]  S. Pocock,et al.  Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  J. Soar,et al.  European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 1. Executive summary. , 2010, Resuscitation.

[8]  M. Dudziak,et al.  The knowledge of public access to defibrillation in selected cities in Poland , 2013, Archives of medical science : AMS.

[9]  D J Roe,et al.  Outcomes of rapid defibrillation by security officers after cardiac arrest in casinos. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  J P Ornato,et al.  Public-access Defibrillation and Survival after Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest Recommended Citation Public-access Defibrillation and Survival after Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest , 2022 .

[11]  J. McNeil,et al.  Is the public equipped to act in out of hospital cardiac emergencies? , 2003, Emergency medicine journal : EMJ.

[12]  G. Perkins,et al.  Variability in cardiac arrest survival: the NHS Ambulance Service Quality Indicators , 2011, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[13]  J. Lubin,et al.  An assessment of public attitudes toward automated external defibrillators. , 2004, Resuscitation.

[14]  R. Berg,et al.  Global incidences of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and survival rates: Systematic review of 67 prospective studies. , 2010, Resuscitation.

[15]  Henry E. Wang,et al.  Effects of AED device features on performance by untrained laypersons. , 2009, Resuscitation.