Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the Vestfold County Study

[1]  Consumer Protection,et al.  European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition--summary document. , 2008, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[2]  Gisella Gennaro,et al.  Dose comparison between screen/film and full-field digital mammography , 2006, European Radiology.

[3]  Ingvar Andersson,et al.  Rate of over-diagnosis of breast cancer 15 years after end of Malmö mammographic screening trial: follow-up study , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  G. Marchal,et al.  Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a computed radiography system by comparison of digital hard copy images with screen–film mammography: results of a prospective clinical trial , 2006, European Radiology.

[5]  P. Skaane,et al.  Follow-up and final results of the oslo I study comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading , 2005, Acta radiologica.

[6]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of Digital Versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Comparing the performance of mammography screening in the USA and the UK , 2005, Journal of medical screening.

[8]  U. Fischer,et al.  Digital mammography: current state and future aspects , 2005, European Radiology.

[9]  Per Skaane,et al.  Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program--the Oslo II Study. , 2004, Radiology.

[10]  S. Hofvind,et al.  Do the results of the process indicators in the Norwegian breast cancer screening program predict future mortality reduction from breast cancer? , 2004, Acta oncologica.

[11]  S. Duffy,et al.  Overdiagnosis in Screening: Is the Increase in Breast Cancer Incidence Rates a Cause for Concern ? , 2004 .

[12]  S. Duffy,et al.  Overdiagnosis in screening: is the increase in breast cancer incidence rates a cause for concern? , 2004, Journal of medical screening.

[13]  Per Skaane,et al.  Population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--Oslo I study. , 2003, Radiology.

[14]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Digital Mammography , 2019, Advances in Clinical Radiology.

[15]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[16]  H. Hussain,et al.  How significant is detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in a breast screening programme? , 2002, Clinical radiology.

[17]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  R. Hendrick,et al.  Performance comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography in clinical practice. , 2002, Medical physics.

[19]  S. Obenauer,et al.  Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography , 2002, European Radiology.

[20]  E. Grabbe,et al.  Screen film vs full-field digital mammography: image quality, detectability and characterization of lesions , 2002, European Radiology.

[21]  M J Schell,et al.  Association of recall rates with sensitivity and positive predictive values of screening mammography. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  J M Lewin,et al.  Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations. , 2001, Radiology.

[23]  R E Hendrick,et al.  Rates and causes of disagreement in interpretation of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography in a diagnostic setting. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  Robert M. Nishikawa,et al.  Radiologists’ Preferences for Digital Mammographic Display , 2000 .

[25]  S. Feig,et al.  Ductal carcinoma in situ. Implications for screening mammography. , 2000 .

[26]  Craig A. Beam,et al.  Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample. , 1996, Archives of internal medicine.

[27]  P E Shile,et al.  Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. , 1996, Academic radiology.

[28]  J. Elmore,et al.  Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.