Vibratory signals and spider behavior: How do the sensory inputs from the eight legs interact in orientation?

SummaryWhen the wandering spiderCupiennius salei is standing with one or several of its legs on a platform that begins to vibrate, it turns toward the platform if the stimulus resembles prey-generated vibration. With application of simultaneous, uniformly intense substrate vibration, the turning angle depends on the combination of legs stimulated.When the forelegs are stimulated the mean error angle is smaller than when the stimulus is applied to the hindlegs (Figs. 3, 4a, 6, 7); accordingly, the sensory information from the forelegs is weighted more strongly in establishing turning angle. The relation of turning angle to the stimulated leg combination can be described by the following three properties of the central nervous interaction of the sensory inputs from the eight legs. 1. The stimulus angles are multiplied by aconstant weighting factor (F) specific to each leg (1st leg,F=1.2; 2nd leg, 0.6; 3rd and 4th legs, 0.4). 2. The stimulation of an anterior leg reduces theF of all posterior legs on the same side by 0.1 (additiveipsilateral inhibition). 3. When legs are stimulated on both sides there is a reciprocalcontralateral inhibition acting exclusively from front to back. This inhibition is multiplicative, in all cases decreasingF by the factor 0.5.During experiments in which stimuli with different amplitudes(p1∶p2=1∶3.3) or onset times (Δt = 4 ms) are produced by two vibrators, the spiders always move in the direction of the legs stimulated first or with larger amplitude (Figs. 5, 6, 7), as though only these legs were stimulated.The turning angles resulting from airborne stimulation alone (buzzing fly) or substrate vibration alone (vibrating platform, trichobothria removed) do not differ significantly from those found with simultaneous stimulation by way of both air and substrate (P>0.05, F-test). They are distinctly smaller than the stimulus angles. The error angles increase as the stimulus site moves further posterior (Figs. 2, 8). Asymmetrical removal of trichobothria (only the 3rd and 4th right legs intact) reveals that these receptors interact in the CNS with the substrate-vibration receptors: when stimluated by way of the substrate and the air together (buzzing fly between the intact legs) the animals turn further (in the direction of the intact legs) than do animals entirely lacking trichobothria (Figs. 5a, 6, 7).

[1]  G. Kreysa Angewandte Statistik. Von Lothar Sachs. Springer‐Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 1978. 552 S., 59 Abb., 190 Tab., DM 59,80 , 1979 .

[2]  Philip Brownell,et al.  Orientation to vibrations in sand by the nocturnal scorpionParuroctonus mesaensis: Mechanism of target localization , 1979, Journal of comparative physiology.

[3]  Mechthild Melchers Der beutefang von Cupiennius sam keyserling (Ctenidae) , 1967, Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Ökologie der Tiere.

[4]  K. Wiese The mechanoreceptive system of prey localization inNotonecta , 1974, Journal of comparative physiology.

[5]  F. Barth,et al.  Vibratory Communication Through Living Plants by a Tropical Wandering Spider , 1981, Science.

[6]  Friedrich G. Barth,et al.  Compound slit sense organs on the spider leg: Mechanoreceptors involved in kinesthetic orientation , 1972, Journal of comparative physiology.

[7]  F. Barth Chapter 3 Spiders and Vibratory Signals: Sensory Reception and Behavioral Significance , 1982 .

[8]  G. S. Watson,et al.  Statistical methods for the analysis of problems in animal orientation and certain biological rhythms , 1966 .

[9]  Friedrich G. Barth,et al.  Vibratory signals and prey capture in orb-weaving spiders (Zygiella x-notata, Nephila clavipes; Araneidae) , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.

[10]  R. K. Murphey Mutual inhibition and the organization of a non-visual orientation inNotonecta , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[11]  F. Barth,et al.  The release of attack and escape behavior by vibratory stimuli in a wandering spider (Cupiennim salei keys.) , 1983, Journal of comparative physiology.