Individual Differences in Need for Precision

This article develops and validates a measure of the construct of need for precision (NFP), defined as a preference for engaging in a relatively fine-grained mode of processing, and studies its relationship to several constructs. NFP is argued to have a motivational influence on several facets of social cognition. The nature of the NFP construct is discussed in the theoretical context of the five-factor model from personality research. A measure of NFP was developed and modified on the basis of tests of reliability and unidimensionality across several studies. The scale was also tested for different forms of validity across several studies using self-reports and behavioral tasks. AHP was related to several constructs from past research including breadth of categorization, unit of perception, need for cognition, tolerance for ambiguity, intelligence, field dependability, and attitudes toward numerical information, statistics, and mathematics.

[1]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  H. Hurt,et al.  SCALES FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF INNOVATIVENESS , 1977 .

[3]  C. F. Kao,et al.  The efficient assessment of need for cognition. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.

[4]  Jack F. Heller,et al.  Correlations of extraversion, impulsivity and sociability with sensation seeking and MBTI-introversion , 1987 .

[5]  A. Tellegen,et al.  An alternative "description of personality": the big-five factor structure. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Madhubalan Viswanathan,et al.  Measurement of Individual Differences in Preference for Numerical Information , 1993 .

[7]  I. B. Myers.  The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Manual (1962). , 1962 .

[8]  G. Āllport,et al.  Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. , 1936 .

[9]  Scott L. Rogers,et al.  Memorial consequences of variation in behavior perception , 1988 .

[10]  Steven M. Johnson,et al.  The limits of fit: Examining the implications of person‐environment congruence within different religious settings , 1985 .

[11]  D. Buss,et al.  The cognitive style of breadth of categorization: Longitudinal consistency of personality correlates , 1981 .

[12]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[13]  M. Zuckerman,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A SENSATION-SEEKING SCALE. , 1964, Journal of consulting psychology.

[14]  T. Pettigrew.  The measurement and correlates of category width as a cognitive variable1 , 1958 .

[15]  Steven L. Wise,et al.  The Development and Validation of a Scale Measuring Attitudes toward Statistics , 1985 .

[16]  David V. Budescu,et al.  Timed magnitude comparisons of numerical and nonnumerical expressions of uncertainty , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[17]  Riley W. Gardner,et al.  Differentiation and abstraction in concept formation. , 1962 .

[18]  P. Hewitt,et al.  The multidimensional perfectionism scale : reliability, validity, and psychometric properties in psychiatric samples , 1991 .

[19]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  Motivational Influences on Impression Formation: Outcome Dependency, Accuracy-Driven Attention, and Individuating Processes , 1987 .

[20]  M. Carlyn,et al.  An assessment of the Myers-Briggs Type indicator. , 1977, Journal of personality assessment.

[21]  Sandra J. Milberg,et al.  Category-based and attribute-based reactions to others: Some informational conditions of stereotyping and individuating processes , 1987 .

[22]  R. Norton,et al.  Measurement of ambiguity tolerance. , 1975, Journal of personality assessment.

[23]  C. Barbaranelli,et al.  The "big five questionnaire": A new questionnaire to assess the five factor model , 1993 .

[24]  L. R. Goldberg.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF MARKERS FOR THE BIG-FIVE FACTOR STRUCTURE , 1992 .

[25]  Michael D. Berzonsky,et al.  Social-Cognitive Aspects of Identity Style , 1992 .

[26]  Jan Bell,et al.  The Effect of Presentation Form on the Use of Information in Annual Reports , 1984 .

[27]  S. Chaiken.  Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .

[28]  Henri C. Schouwenburg,et al.  Trait procrastination and the Big-five factors of personality , 1995 .

[29]  Ruth Beyth-Marom,et al.  How probable is probable? A numerical translation of verbal probability expressions , 1982 .

[30]  William P. Banks,et al.  Encoding and Processing of Symbolic Information in Comparative Judgments1 , 1977 .

[31]  John E. Donovan,et al.  Structural equation models and personality research , 1986 .

[32]  Darren Newtson.  Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior. , 1973 .

[33]  S. Briggs,et al.  The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales , 1986 .

[34]  Terry L. Childers.  Assessment of the Psychometric Properties of an Opinion Leadership Scale , 1986 .

[35]  M. Rokeach,et al.  Political and religious dogmatism: An alternative to the authoritarian personality. , 1956 .

[36]  G. Caprara,et al.  The big five as tendencies in situations , 1994 .

[37]  J. M. Digman.  PERSONALITY STRUCTURE: EMERGENCE OF THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL , 1990 .

[38]  F. Keil,et al.  Acquisition of the hierarchy of tonal functions in music , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[39]  J. Mattia,et al.  A comparison of two measures of perfectionism. , 1993 .

[40]  J. Bruner,et al.  Cognitive risk and environmental change. , 1961 .