An ex-ante evaluation of a White Certificates scheme in The Netherlands: A case study for the household sector

Increased efficiency of energy demand is generally recognized as a very cost-effective strategy to reduce energy requirements and the related environmental impacts (e.g. the greenhouse effect). In order to improve energy efficiency the use of innovative market mechanisms, such as the White Certificates (WhC), has been proposed. The basic idea underlying this policy instrument is that specific energy saving targets are set for energy suppliers or energy distributors. These requirements must be fulfilled in a predefined time frame. The focus of this paper is on the effect on energy efficiency improvement, on the behavior of the end consumers and the market of energy efficiency measures. Furthermore, we study the possible effects of WhC in The Netherlands by means of a theoretical analysis and an empirical bottom-up model. We compare concrete energy efficient technologies in terms of cost-effectiveness and energy efficiency improvement. In combination with existing Dutch policies for energy efficiency improvement in the built environment, the contribution of this innovative scheme could enhance the accomplishment of energy efficiency targets. In this paper, two packages of energy saving measures of a WhC scheme are studied for Dutch households. The costs of these technologies are estimated through the use of different discount rates, which imply overcoming of the market barriers through the use of the WhC. A scheme that includes all available technologies as flexible options appears as a realistic solution and can generate cost effectively up to 180 PJ primary energy savings and 4550 M€ cumulative net savings in the year 2020, at a discount rate of 5%, under the precondition that the policy and administrative costs can be kept low.

[1]  M. Binswanger.  Technological progress and sustainable development: what about the rebound effect? , 2001 .

[2]  Eric Hirst,et al.  Residential energy use and conservation actions: analysis of disaggregate household data , 1981 .

[3]  Joachim Schleich,et al.  Do energy audits help reduce barriers to energy efficiency? An empirical analysis for Germany , 2004 .

[4]  James E. McMahon,et al.  The Behavior of the Market for Energy Efficiency in Residential Appliances Including Heating and Cooling Equipment , 1987 .

[5]  Eric Hirst,et al.  Residential energy use: Analysis of disaggregate data☆ , 1982 .

[6]  C. Midden,et al.  Using feedback, reinforcement and information to reduce energy consumption in households: A field-experiment , 1983 .

[7]  Kornelis Blok,et al.  The direct and indirect energy requirements of households in the Netherlands , 1995 .

[8]  W. Poortinga,et al.  Household preferences for energy-saving measures: A conjoint analysis , 2003 .

[10]  R. Sutherland.  Market Barriers to Energy-Efficiency Investments , 1991 .

[11]  Determinants of participation in home energy audit/loan programs: Discrete choice model results , 1986 .

[12]  R. Wirtshafter.  Non-participants in utility energy conservation programmes , 1985 .

[13]  Dermot Gately,et al.  Individual Discount Rates and the Purchase and Utilization of Energy-Using Durables: Comment , 1980 .

[14]  Kenneth E. Boulding,et al.  The Economics of Energy , 1973 .

[15]  P. Alari,et al.  The Italian energy saving obligation to gas and electricity distribution companies. Scenario and case studies calculations show high environmental and economic benefits to actors (DISCOs, ESCOs, customers) and society , 2003 .

[16]  H. Varian.  Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach , 1987 .

[17]  Howard Geller,et al.  Market Transformation Strategies to Promote End-Use Efficiency , 1994 .

[18]  D. Greene,et al.  Energy efficiency and consumption — the rebound effect — a survey , 2000 .

[19]  Jerry A. Hausman,et al.  Individual Discount Rates and the Purchase and Utilization of Energy-Using Durables , 1979 .

[20]  A. Levinson,et al.  Energy Use By Apartment Tenants When Landlords Pay For Utilities , 2004 .

[21]  Household Energy Conservation Investment and the Uninformed Consumer Hypothesis (with Alexander M. Brill and Kevin A. Hassett) , 1999 .

[22]  M. Webb,et al.  The economics of energy , 1980 .

[23]  Carl Koopmans,et al.  Bridging the energy efficiency gap: using bottom-up information in a top-down energy demand model , 2001 .

[24]  Wijngaart Ra van den,et al.  Sectoral CO2 emissions in the Netherlands up to 2010.Update of the Reference Projection for Policy-making on Indicative Targets , 2004 .

[25]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  “White and Green”: Comparison of market-based instruments to promote energy efficiency , 2005 .

[26]  Jeannet H. Van Houwelingen,et al.  The Effect of Goal-Setting and Daily Electronic Feedback on In-Home Energy Use , 1989 .

[27]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Folk quantification of energy , 1982 .

[28]  Loren Lutzenhiser,et al.  A cultural model of household energy consumption , 1992 .

[29]  Gwendolyn Brandon,et al.  REDUCING HOUSEHOLD ENERGY CONSUMPTION: A QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE FIELD STUDY , 1999 .

[30]  Lynn Langmeyer.  A social psychological perspective on energy conservation in residential buildings. , 1984 .

[31]  Barbara Praetorius,et al.  How much market do market-based instruments create? An analysis for the case of "white" certificates , 2003 .

[32]  K. Train.  Discount rates in consumers' energy-related decisions: A review of the literature , 1985 .

[33]  B. Boardman.  New directions for household energy efficiency: evidence from the UK , 2004 .

[34]  Martijn G. Rietbergen,et al.  The Effectiveness of Policy Instruments for Energy-Efficiency Improvement in Firms: The Dutch Experience , 2004 .

[35]  J. Bergh.  Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics , 1999 .