PRIORITY EFFECTS IN CORAL REEF FISH COMMUNITIES

Demographically open communities are often viewed as stochastically structured assemblages because most colonizing juveniles arrive via unpredictable dispersal mechanisms. However, interactions between established residents and incoming juveniles may affect juvenile persistence in species-specific ways and could therefore impose a degree of determinism on future community structure. Using 16 spatially isolated communities of coral reef fishes, I conducted two experiments to determine how prior residency by two guilds of fishes affected juvenile recruitment. Each experiment factorially manipulated the presence and absence of two guilds: resident piscivores (groupers and moray eels) and interference competitors (territorial damselfishes). In the first experiment, guilds were manipulated via selective removals, and subsequent recruitment (larval settlement minus mortality) was monitored for 44 days. In the second experiment, guilds were placed within large cages to prevent direct resident–juvenile interactions, while allowing for any cues produced by enclosed fishes, thereby testing whether incoming larvae used resident-derived cues to select or reject settlement sites. Colonizing juveniles were collected from each reef over 42 days to prevent confounding resident- and recruit-derived cues. In the first experiment, piscivores inhibited recruitment of a damselfish (Pomacentridae) and a surgeonfish (Acanthuridae), and enhanced recruitment of a wrasse (Labridae). In contrast, territorial damselfishes inhibited recruitment of the damselfish and the wrasse, and enhanced recruitment of the surgeonfish. Observations of early recruitment patterns suggested that recruitment differences were established rapidly during the night or dawn periods shortly after settlement and before each daily census. In the second experiment, there was no evidence that larvae used resident-derived cues to select settlement sites, suggesting that recruitment differences in the first experiment resulted from differential mortality caused by direct resident–recruit interactions rather than differential larval settlement. These results demonstrate that interactions between established residents and newly arrived juveniles can have a strong influence on juvenile persistence, and that such interactions appear to be strongest within hours of larval settlement. Furthermore, because resident effects were species specific, the present composition of these communities may impose a previously undocumented degree of determinism on their future structure.

[1]  P. Sale,et al.  Temporal Variability in the Community Structure of Fish on Coral Patch Reefs and the Relation of Community Structure to Reef Structure , 1984 .

[2]  D. Booth,et al.  Settlement preferences in coral-reef fishes: Effects on patterns of adult and juvenile distributions, individual fitness and population structure , 1998 .

[3]  C. Johnson,et al.  SPATIALLY AND TEMPORALLY PREDICTABLE FISHCOMMUNITIES ON CORAL REEFS , 1998 .

[4]  G. Jones,et al.  Habitat complexity modifies the impact of piscivores on a coral reef fish population , 1998, Oecologia.

[5]  B. Victor CHAPTER 9 – Settlement Strategies and Biogeography of Reef Fishes , 1991 .

[6]  S. Morand,et al.  Cleaner-client interactions on a Caribbean reef: influence of correlates of parasitism , 2000, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[7]  L. Blaustein,et al.  Priority effects in temporary pools : nature and outcome of mosquito larva toad tadpole interactions depend on order of entrance , 1996 .

[8]  P. Morin,et al.  TEMPORAL OVERLAP, COMPETITION, AND PRIORITY EFFECTS IN LARVAL ANURANS' , 1993 .

[9]  P. Sale Assemblages of fish on patch reefs — predictable or unpredictable? , 1980, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[10]  H. Sweatman The influence of adults of some coral reef fishes on larval recruitment , 1985 .

[11]  L. Kaufman,et al.  A key phase in the recruitment dynamics of coral reef fishes: post-settlement transition , 1992, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[12]  M. Hixon,et al.  CHAPTER 17 – Predation as a Process Structuring Coral Reef Fish Communities , 1991 .

[13]  M. Bertness,et al.  Competition and Facilitation in Marsh Plants , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[14]  P. Sale The effect of territorial adult pomacentrid fishes on the recruitment and survival of juveniles on patches of coral rubble , 1976 .

[15]  M. Hixon,et al.  Predation effects on early post-settlement survivorship of coral-reef fishes , 1995 .

[16]  G. Jones,et al.  Self-recruitment in a coral reef fish population , 1999, Nature.

[17]  J. Connell The Influence of Interspecific Competition and Other Factors on the Distribution of the Barnacle Chthamalus Stellatus , 1961 .

[18]  R. Alford,et al.  Priority Effects in Experimental Pond Communities: Competition between Bufo and Rana , 1985 .

[19]  R. Ostfeld,et al.  Effects of rodents on survival of tree seeds and seedlings invading old fields , 1997 .

[20]  G. Jones Some interactions between residents and recruits in two coral reef fishes , 1988 .

[21]  D. R. Robertson,et al.  INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION CONTROLS ABUNDANCE AND HABITAT USE OF TERRITORIAL CARIBBEAN DAMSELFISHES , 1996 .

[22]  G. Forrester FACTORS INFLUENCING THE JUVENILE DEMOGRAPHY OF A CORAL REEF FISH , 1990 .

[23]  M. Hixon,et al.  CHAPTER 14 – Density Dependence in Reef Fish Populations , 2002 .

[24]  J. Leis CHAPTER 8 – The Pelagic Stage of Reef Fishes: The Larval Biology of Coral Reef Fishes , 1991 .

[25]  H. Sweatman Field evidence that settling coral reef fish larvae detect resident fishes using dissolved chemical cues , 1988 .

[26]  H. Sweatman Influence of conspecifics on choice of settlement sites by larvae of two pomacentrid fishes (Dascyllus aruanus and D. reticulatus) on coral reefs , 1983 .

[27]  L. McCook,et al.  TERRITORIAL DAMSELFISHES AS DETERMINANTS OF THE STRUCTURE OF BENTHIC COMMUNITIES ON CORAL REEFS , 2001 .

[28]  P. Doherty Some effects of density on the juveniles of two species of tropical, territorial damselfish , 1982 .

[29]  M. Caley Predation, recruitment and the dynamics of communities of coral-reef fishes , 1993 .

[30]  Mark A. Steele,et al.  THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF PROCESSES AFFECTING RECRUITMENT OF TWO TEMPERATE REEF FISHES , 1997 .

[31]  R. Alford,et al.  Priority effects in experimental pond communities: responses of Hyla to Bufo and Rana , 1985 .

[32]  M. Hixon,et al.  Synergistic predation, density dependence, and population regulation in marine fish , 1997 .

[33]  J. Roughgarden,et al.  THEORY OF MARINE COMMUNITIES: COMPETITION, PREDATION, AND RECRUITMENT-DEPENDENT INTERACTION STRENGTH , 1999 .

[34]  J. Ogden,et al.  Priority Effects in the Recruitment of Juvenile Coral Reef Fishes , 1983 .

[35]  Craig Syms,et al.  DISTURBANCE, HABITAT STRUCTURE, AND THE DYNAMICS OF A CORAL-REEF FISH COMMUNITY , 2000 .

[36]  Colin J. Burrows,et al.  Processes of Vegetation Change , 1990, Springer Netherlands.

[37]  F. Ramsey,et al.  The statistical sleuth : a course in methods of data analysis , 2002 .

[38]  M. Caley AGE-SPECIFIC MORTALITY RATES IN REEF FISHES : EVIDENCE AND IMPLICATIONS , 1998 .

[39]  Andrea Risk The effects of interactions with reef residents on the settlement , 1998, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[40]  P. Sale,et al.  Ecological structure of assemblages of coral reef fishes on isolated patch reefs , 1994, Oecologia.

[41]  D. Booth Larval settlement patterns and preferences by domino damselfish Dascyllus albisella Gill , 1992 .

[42]  M. Webster Role of predators in the early post-settlement demography of coral-reef fishes , 2002, Oecologia.

[43]  W. Sousa Disturbance in Marine Intertidal Boulder Fields: The Nonequilibrium Maintenance of Species Diversity , 1979 .

[44]  B. Danilowicz Choice of coral species by naive and field-caught damselfishes , 1996 .

[45]  B. Menge,et al.  Community Regulation: Variation in Disturbance, Competition, and Predation in Relation to Environmental Stress and Recruitment , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[46]  D. Eggleston,et al.  ECOLOGICAL PROCESSES UNDERLYING ONTOGENETIC HABITAT SHIFTS IN A CORAL REEF FISH , 2000 .

[47]  P. Doherty,et al.  The replenishment of coral reef fish populations , 1988 .

[48]  S. Holbrook,et al.  MORTALITY OF JUVENILE DAMSELFISH: IMPLICATIONS FOR ASSESSING PROCESSES THAT DETERMINE ABUNDANCE , 1999 .

[49]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  Plant Succession: Life History and Competition , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[50]  D. R. Robertson,et al.  Coexistence: Symbiotic sharing of feeding territories and algal food by some coral reef fishes from the Western Indian Ocean , 1981 .

[51]  G. Jones CHAPTER 11 – Postrecruitment Processes in the Ecology of Coral Reef Fish Populations: A Multifactorial Perspective , 1991 .

[52]  J. Beets Effects of a predatory fish on the recruitment and abundance of Caribbean coral reef fishes , 1997 .

[53]  D. Booth Juvenile Groups in a Coral‐Reef Damselfish: Density‐Dependent Effects on Individual Fitness and Population Demography , 1995 .

[54]  W. McFarland CHAPTER 2 – The Visual World of Coral Reef Fishes , 1991 .

[55]  J. M. Elliott,et al.  Host selection, location, and association behaviors of anemonefishes in field settlement experiments , 1995 .

[56]  M. L. Reaka-Kudla The ecology of coral reefs , 1985 .

[57]  Poulin,et al.  Cleaning symbiosis as an evolutionary game: To cheat or not to cheat? , 1995, Journal of theoretical biology.

[58]  G. Almany,et al.  Positive indirect effects in a coral reef fish community , 2002 .

[59]  J. Caselle,et al.  Larval retention and recruitment in an island population of a coral-reef fish , 1999, Nature.

[60]  G. Lecaillon,et al.  Caging experiment to examine mortality during metamorphosis of coral reef fish larvae , 2001, Coral Reefs.