Quality Improvement in External Radiation Therapy Using a Departmental Incident Reporting System and Multidisciplinary Team Efforts

Purpose: Incidents in radiation therapy occur due to the complex process, non-automated procedures, and miscommunication. We performed a prospective study to reduce the incidence rate during 4 years of external radiation therapy using incident-reporting system with multidisciplinary team (MDT) efforts. Methods: Incidents from May 2009 to April 2013 were recorded, blame-free and voluntarily. The incidents involved errors which were unintended, whether they caused patient harm or not. Cause analysis of the incidents and interventions were performed through an MDT meeting in which all staff participated, including radiation oncologists, medical physicists, nurses, and radiation technologists. Our interventions included continuous feedback and improvements with minimized unnecessary stress. Results: In total, 49 actual incidents among 2,350 radiation therapy courses were noted during the 4 years. The actual incidents occurred most frequently during treatment planning (74%, 36/49), followed by treatment delivery (20%, 10/49). Of the 49 actual incidents, 59%, 16%, 12%, 8%, 2%, 2% incidents were caused by failure to follow procedures or policies, incomplete knowledge, miscommunication, operation errors, work environment, and incorrect supervision, respectively. The actual incident rates, based on the number of treatment courses, were 4%, 2%, 1%, and 1% in the first, second, third, and fourth years, respectively. We found a significant decrease in the actual incident rate during the third and fourth years compared with the first year (p<0.01). Conclusions: The frequency of incidents during radiation therapy was reduced using a voluntary incident reporting system and the efforts of a MDT.

[1]  Jing Xu,et al.  Quantitative assessment of workload and stressors in clinical radiation oncology. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  R. Dismukes,et al.  Prospective Memory in Workplace and Everyday Situations , 2012 .

[3]  R. M. Vazquez The Checklist Manifesto How to Get Things Right , 2011 .

[4]  Michael G Herman,et al.  Improving patient safety in radiation oncology. , 2010, Medical physics.

[5]  Tommy Knöös,et al.  Radiation Oncology Safety Information System (ROSIS)--profiles of participants and the first 1074 incident reports. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  C. Landrigan,et al.  Temporal trends in rates of patient harm resulting from medical care. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  M. Rehani,et al.  Current issues and actions in radiation protection of patients. , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[8]  Jean-Pierre Bissonnette,et al.  Trend analysis of radiation therapy incidents over seven years. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[9]  Laval Grimard,et al.  The management of radiation treatment error through incident learning. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[10]  Peter J Pronovost,et al.  Reducing health care hazards: lessons from the commercial aviation safety team. , 2009, Health affairs.

[11]  Savino Cilla,et al.  Complexity index (COMIX) and not type of treatment predicts undetected errors in radiotherapy planning and delivery. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  Timothy J Logan Error prevention as developed in airlines. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  Lawrence B Marks,et al.  The impact of advanced technologies on treatment deviations in radiation treatment delivery. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  Jean-Pierre Bissonnette,et al.  Error in the delivery of radiation therapy: results of a quality assurance review. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  H. Takeda,et al.  A web-based incident reporting system and multidisciplinary collaborative projects for patient safety in a Japanese hospital , 2005, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[16]  T. K. Yeung,et al.  Quality assurance in radiotherapy: evaluation of errors and incidents recorded over a 10 year period. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[17]  M R Cohen,et al.  Why error reporting systems should be voluntary , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  P. Barach,et al.  Reporting and preventing medical mishaps: lessons from non-medical near miss reporting systems , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  D L McShan,et al.  The impact of treatment complexity and computer-control delivery technology on treatment delivery errors. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  D. Altman,et al.  Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. , 1995, BMJ.

[21]  C. J. Karzmark,et al.  Medical accelerator safety considerations: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 35. , 1993, Medical physics.

[22]  Sha X. Chang,et al.  Improving quality of patient care by improving daily practice in radiation oncology. , 2012, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[23]  A. Gawande,et al.  The Checklist Manifesto: How to Get Things Right , 2011 .

[24]  George L. Germain,et al.  Practical loss control leadership , 1996 .