A comprehensive experimental study of micro-perforated panel acoustic absorbers in MRI scanners

ObjectA comprehensive experimental study has been conducted to investigate the possibilities of using micro-perforated panel (MPP) acoustic absorbers in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners.Materials and methodThe experimental acoustic measurements include measurements in an impedance tube, measurements in an MRI scanner bore mock-up, and in situ measurements in an actual MRI scanner.ResultsThe experimental results are in good agreement with theoretical calculations. This study confirms that MPP acoustic absorbers have multiple absorption frequency bands and wider frequency bands at higher frequency ranges when they are used in cylindrically shaped ducts such as MRI scanner bores. It has also been found that the acoustic noise level in the scanner bore is significantly increased when the air gap depth behind the MPP is too large.ConclusionThis study shows that an MPP absorber, when properly designed, is effective in reducing the acoustic noise in MRI scanners. And, when designing an MPP absorber for MRI scanners, the air gap depth should be carefully considered.

[1]  A Quiet Gradient-Coil Set Employing Optimized, Force-Shielded, Distributed Coil Designs , 1995 .

[2]  Yuhua Wu,et al.  MRI gradient coil cylinder sound field simulation and measurement. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[3]  G. L.,et al.  Theory of Vibrating Systems and Sound , 1927, Nature.

[4]  Pedro Cobo,et al.  Hybrid passive–active absorption using microperforated panels , 2004 .

[5]  Richard Bowtell,et al.  Active acoustic screening : design principles for quiet gradient coils in MRI , 1994 .

[6]  Peter Mansfield,et al.  Quiet gradient coils: active acoustically and magnetically screened distributed transverse gradient designs , 1995 .

[7]  R. Bowtell,et al.  Active Acoustic Screening: Reduction of Noise in Gradient Coils by Lorentz Force Balancing , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  D. Maa,et al.  Potential of microperforated panel absorber , 1998 .

[9]  D. Lim,et al.  Effects of the acoustic noise of the gradient systems on fMRI: A study on auditory, motor, and visual cortices , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  P Mansfield,et al.  Quite transverse gradiant coils: Lorentz force balanced designs using geometrical similitude , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  L. Rayleigh,et al.  The theory of sound , 1894 .

[12]  E Borg,et al.  MRI acoustic noise: Sound pressure and frequency analysis , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  S. R. Lane,et al.  Acoustic analysis of gradient-coil noise in MR imaging. , 1989, Radiology.

[14]  Jian Kang,et al.  Feasibility of applying micro-perforated absorbers in acoustic window systems , 2005 .

[15]  P. Mansfield,et al.  Active acoustic control in gradient coils for MRI , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  M McJury,et al.  The use of active noise control (ANC) to reduce acoustic noise generated during MRI scanning: some initial results. , 1997, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[17]  D Maa,et al.  THEORY AND DESIGN OF MICROPERFORATED PANEL SOUND-ABSORBING CONSTRUCTIONS , 1975 .

[18]  Mei Q. Wu,et al.  Micro-perforated panels for duct silencing , 1997 .

[19]  M. Quirk,et al.  Anxiety in patients undergoing MR imaging. , 1989, Radiology.

[20]  Stewart C. Bushong,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical and Biological Principles , 1988 .