Investigation and prioritization of risk factors in the collision of two passenger trains based on fuzzy COPRAS and fuzzy DEMATEL methods

Identifying the critical risk factors in train accidents play a vital role in the prevention of their recurrence in the future. However, this is a complex procedure due to the fact that it includes decision making and depends on a large number of relevant factors. In order to resolve this problem, first, this study made an effort to identify the risk factors in the collision of two passenger trains near the ‘‘Haft Khan Station’’ between Semnan and Damghan using the interview technique and the questionnaire survey technique which focused on railway industry experts’ opinions and treated them as decision makers. Second, it developed a new framework of risk assessment by prioritizing the identified risk factors in the collision of two passenger trains in order to remedy all of the deficiencies and to improve the safety of railway transportation. Therefore, risk assessment of contributory factors in the collision was based on multi-criteria decision-making approaches such as fuzzy complex proportional assessment (COPRAS) and fuzzy decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL). Accordingly, the study prioritized the risk factors in the collision of two passenger trains including management, individual and environmental conditions, and reaction to events regarding Fuzzy COPRAS and Fuzzy DEMATEL. Finally, sensitivity analysis indicated that the fuzzy DEMATEL had a better performance than the fuzzy COPRAS method. More specifically, it: (a) prioritized the risk factors in a better way due to its higher Spearman’s ranking correlation coefficient; (b) facilitated the cause-effect analysis; and (c) was in line with the real collected observation data. In regard to Fuzzy DEMATEL model, the results showed that the critical risk factor with the highest rank was the stop of the front train at the back of the hill. Moreover, the critical risk factor with the lowest rank was the absence of the installation of the Balise system.

[1]  Alex Viale,et al.  Application of a human error framework to conduct train accident/incident investigations. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  E. Donald Sussman,et al.  Railroad Human Factors , 2007 .

[3]  C M Pollock,et al.  The influence of sustained attention on railway accidents. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Andrew W Evans,et al.  Fatal train accidents on Europe's railways: 1980-2009. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Don Jyh-Fu Jeng,et al.  Generating a causal model of supply chain collaboration using the fuzzy DEMATEL technique , 2015, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[6]  Karen Klockner,et al.  Accident Modelling of Railway Safety Occurrences: The Safety and Failure Event Network (SAFE-Net) Method☆ , 2015 .

[7]  Gülin Feryal Can,et al.  A novel fuzzy risk matrix based risk assessment approach , 2018, Kybernetes.

[8]  Vahid Baradaran Assessment and Prioritizing the Risks of Urban Rail Transportation by Using Grey Analytical Hierarchy Process (GAHP) , 2017 .

[9]  D. Tyrell,et al.  A Train-to-Train Impact Test of Crash Energy Management Passenger Rail Equipment: Structural Results , 2006 .

[10]  Morteza Yazdani,et al.  A decision support model based on the combined structure of DEMATEL, QFD and fuzzy values , 2020, Soft Comput..

[11]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  Evaluating the enablers in solar power developments in the current scenario using fuzzy DEMATEL: An Indian perspective , 2016 .

[12]  M. Cengız Toklu Determination of Customer Loyalty Levels by Using Fuzzy MCDM Approaches , 2017 .

[13]  Mesut Kumru,et al.  Fuzzy FMEA application to improve purchasing process in a public hospital , 2013, Appl. Soft Comput..

[14]  Satish Bhagwatrao Aher,et al.  Railway Disasters in India: Causes, Effects and Management , 2018 .

[15]  Ove Njå,et al.  Organizational effects of experience from accidents. Learning in the aftermath of the Tretten and Åsta train accidents , 2014 .

[16]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Application of Neutrosophic Set to Multicriteria Decision Making by Copras , 2017 .

[17]  Hakan Akyildiz,et al.  A FSA based fuzzy DEMATEL approach for risk assessment of cargo ships at coasts and open seas of Turkey , 2015 .

[18]  Zakaria Harun,et al.  Contractors' perception of the use of costs of quality system in Malaysian building construction projects , 2012 .

[19]  Yi-Hsuan Chen,et al.  A fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating banking performance based on Balanced Scorecard , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[20]  Erkan Celik,et al.  A fuzzy DEMATEL method to evaluate critical operational hazards during gas freeing process in crude oil tankers , 2015 .

[21]  Andrew S McIntosh,et al.  Understanding the human factors contribution to railway accidents and incidents in Australia. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  Margaret Grieco,et al.  Mobilities: New Perspectives on Transport and Society , 2007 .

[23]  Rita Gamberini,et al.  A fuzzy multi-attribute model for risk evaluation in workplaces. , 2009 .

[24]  Marivi Higuero,et al.  Eurobalise-Train communication modelling to assess interferences in railway control signalling systems , 2016, Netw. Protoc. Algorithms.

[25]  Sunan Huang,et al.  Railway risk assessment - the fuzzy reasoning approach and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approaches: A case study of shunting at Waterloo depot , 2007 .

[26]  Yong Deng,et al.  Using the Fuzzy DEMATEL to Determine Environmental Performance: A Case of Printed Circuit Board Industry in Taiwan , 2015, PloS one.

[27]  Xiang Liu,et al.  Analysis of freight train collision risk in the United States , 2018, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit.

[28]  S. Meysam Mousavi,et al.  Soft computing-based new interval-valued hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria group assessment method with last aggregation to industrial decision problems , 2017, Soft Comput..

[29]  Hannan Amoozad Mahdiraji,et al.  A hybrid fuzzy BWM-COPRAS method for analyzing key factors of sustainable architecture , 2018 .

[30]  Abbas Roozbahani,et al.  Inter-basin water transfer planning with grey COPRAS and fuzzy COPRAS techniques: A case study in Iranian Central Plateau. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[31]  Morteza Yazdani,et al.  Risk Analysis of Critical Infrastructures Using Fuzzy Copras , 2011 .

[32]  Bahareh Hani Tabai,et al.  Impact of Train Drivers’ Cognitive Responses on Rail Accidents , 2018, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[33]  Xiang Liu,et al.  Analysis of Derailments by Accident Cause , 2011 .

[34]  ÜnverMuharrem,et al.  The Material Selection By Using Fuzzy Complex Proportional Assessment , 2020 .

[35]  Chih-Hung Wu,et al.  Fuzzy DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[36]  Wei Zheng,et al.  A hybrid human and organizational analysis method for railway accidents based on HFACS-Railway Accidents (HFACS-RAs) , 2017 .

[37]  Habib Hadj-Mabrouk Contribution of Artificial Intelligence to Risk Assessment of Railway Accidents , 2019 .

[38]  Ravi Kant,et al.  A hybrid approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL and FMCDM to predict success of knowledge management adoption in supply chain , 2014, Appl. Soft Comput..

[39]  Masayuki Matsumoto Learning from past railway accidents -- progress of train control , 2006 .

[40]  Yan Q. Sun,et al.  Mitigating Train Derailments Due to Sharp Curve and Overspeed , 2018, Front. Mech. Eng..

[41]  E. Nedeliaková,et al.  RISKS ASSESSMENT IN RAILWAY PASSENGER TRANSPORT IN RELATION TO CUTOMERS , 2015 .

[42]  Yong Deng,et al.  Combining conflicting evidence using the DEMATEL method , 2018, Soft Comput..

[43]  Min An,et al.  An Intelligent Railway Safety Risk Assessment Support System for Railway Operation and Maintenance Analysis , 2013 .

[44]  Ru-Jen Lin Using fuzzy DEMATEL to evaluate the green supply chain management practices , 2013 .

[45]  S. M. Hatefi Strategic planning of urban transportation system based on sustainable development dimensions using an integrated SWOT and fuzzy COPRAS approach. , 2018 .

[46]  Yong Deng,et al.  An enhanced fuzzy evidential DEMATEL method with its application to identify critical success factors , 2018, Soft Computing.

[47]  Christos A. Kontovas,et al.  Formal safety assessment: A critical review , 2009 .

[48]  Quan Zhou,et al.  Identifying critical success factors in emergency management using a fuzzy DEMATEL method , 2011 .

[49]  Leslie Buck,et al.  ERRORS IN THE PERCEPTION OP RAILWAY SIGNALS , 1963 .

[50]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Application of Fuzzy DEMATEL Method for Analyzing Occupational Risks on Construction Sites , 2017 .

[51]  Javad Sadeghi,et al.  Field investigation on effects of railway track geometric parameters on rail wear , 2006 .

[52]  Jiunn-I Shieh,et al.  A DEMATEL method in identifying key success factors of hospital service quality , 2010, Knowl. Based Syst..

[53]  Felix Redmill,et al.  Risk analysis-a subjective process , 2002 .

[54]  Adel Eftekhari,et al.  Investigating the Factors Affecting the collision of Two Passenger Trains: A Case Study , 2018 .

[55]  Wei-Wen Wu,et al.  Developing global managers' competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[56]  Patrick Waterson,et al.  Systems thinking, the Swiss Cheese Model and accident analysis: a comparative systemic analysis of the Grayrigg train derailment using the ATSB, AcciMap and STAMP models. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.