Research on women in science and higher education: a bibliometric analysis

The main objective of this paper is to study the development and growth of scientific literature on women in science and higher education. A total of 1415 articles and reviews published between 1991 and 2012 were extracted from the Thomson Reuters Web of Science database. Standard bibliometric indicators and laws (e.g. Price’s, Lotka’s, and Bradford’s laws) were applied to these data. In addition, the Gender Inequality Index (GII) was obtained for each country in order to rank them. The results suggest an upward trend not only in the number of papers but also in the number of authors per paper. However, this increase in the number of authors was not accompanied by greater international collaboration. The interest in gender differences in science extends too many authors (n = 3064), countries (n = 67), and research areas (n = 86). Data showed a high dispersion of the literature and a small set of core journals focused on the topic. Regarding the research areas, the area with the highest frequency of papers was Education and Educational Research. Finally, our results showed that countries with higher levels of inequality (higher GII values) tend to present higher relative values of scientific productivity in the field.

[1]  Berenika M Webster,et al.  Polish women in science: A bibliometric analysis of Polish science and its publications, 1980-1999 , 2001 .

[2]  Helen Shen.  Inequality quantified: Mind the gender gap , 2013, Nature.

[3]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  The effect of gender on research staff success in life sciences in the Spanish National Research Council , 2008 .

[4]  Anne Boschini,et al.  Is Team Formation Gender Neutral? Evidence from Coauthorship Patterns , 2007, Journal of Labor Economics.

[5]  S. Bradford.  "Sources of information on specific subjects" by S.C. Bradford , 1985 .

[6]  H. Marsh,et al.  Improving the Peer-review Process for Grant Applications , 2022 .

[7]  J. S. Long,et al.  Measures of Sex Differences in Scientific Productivity , 1992 .

[8]  K. Dickersin,et al.  Is there a sex bias in choosing editors? Epidemiology journals as an example. , 1998, JAMA.

[9]  Hanna-Mari Puuska,et al.  Effects of scholar’s gender and professional position on publishing productivity in different publication types. Analysis of a Finnish university , 2010, Scientometrics.

[10]  Jonathan,et al.  THE PRODUCTIVITY PUZZLE : PERSISTENCE AND CHANGE IN PATTERNS OF PUBLICATION OF MEN AND WOMEN SCIENTISTS , 2004 .

[11]  Steven Stack,et al.  Gender, Children and Research Productivity , 2004 .

[12]  M. F. Fox.  Gender, Family Characteristics, and Publication Productivity among Scientists , 2005 .

[13]  George A. Lozano,et al.  The elephant in the room: multi-authorship and the assessment of individual researchers , 2013, ArXiv.

[14]  J. Ward,et al.  Is there gender bias in research fellowships awarded by the NHMRC? , 1998, The Medical journal of Australia.

[15]  T. Tregenza,et al.  Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[16]  M. Graham,et al.  Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  M. Jennions,et al.  The h index and career assessment by numbers. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[18]  Grant Lewison,et al.  The quantity and quality of female researchers: A bibliometric study of Iceland , 2001, Scientometrics.

[19]  Erin E Leahey,et al.  Parenting and research productivity: New evidence and methods , 2010 .

[20]  R. Freeman,et al.  Science and Engineering Careers in the United States , 2009 .

[21]  M. Maehr.  Advances in Motivation and Achievement , 1991 .

[22]  K. Zou,et al.  Gender differences in research grant applications and funding outcomes for medical school faculty. , 2008, Journal of women's health.

[23]  R. Whittaker,et al.  Journal review and gender equality: a critical comment on Budden et al. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  Yvonne Benschop,et al.  Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs , 2012 .

[25]  J. R. Gilbert,et al.  Is there gender bias in JAMA's peer review process? , 1994, JAMA.

[26]  Manuel Bagues,et al.  Does Gender Matter for Academic Promotion? Evidence from a Randomized Natural Experiment , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[27]  Kimberly Gladden Burke,et al.  Unraveling the Academic Productivity of Economists: The Opportunity Costs of Teaching and Service , 2006 .

[28]  Melanie Ward,et al.  The gender salary gap in British academia , 2001 .

[29]  R. Perrucci,et al.  From Little Science to Big Science , 2017 .

[30]  M del Carmen Davo,et al.  Why are women underused in the JECH peer review process? , 2003, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[31]  J. S. Long,et al.  DEPARTMENTAL EFFECTS ON SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTIVITY , 1990 .

[32]  Bettina Schmidt,et al.  Women, Research and Universities: Excellence without Gender Bias , 2014 .

[33]  Marieke van den Brink,et al.  Scouting for talent: appointment practices of women professors in academic medicine. , 2011 .

[34]  Sarina Schrager,et al.  Gender and first authorship of papers in family medicine journals 2006--2008. , 2011, Family medicine.

[35]  Nicole Dewandre,et al.  European Strategies for Promoting Women in Science , 2002, Science.

[36]  Heine Andersen,et al.  The norm of universalism in sciences. Social origin and gender of researchers in Denmark , 2001, Scientometrics.

[37]  Linda Serra Hagedorn,et al.  Faculty Research Productivity: Exploring the Role of Gender and Family-Related Factors , 2002 .

[38]  L. Bornmann,et al.  Gender Effects in the Peer Reviews of Grant Proposals: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Comparing Traditional and Multilevel Approaches , 2009 .

[39]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations , 2004, Scientometrics.

[40]  C. Wennerås,et al.  Nepotism and sexism in peer-review , 1997, Nature.

[41]  Yu Xie,et al.  Sex differences in research productivity : New evidence about an old puzzle , 1998 .

[42]  Donna K. Ginther,et al.  Is MIT an Exception? Gender Pay Differences in Academic Science , 2003 .

[43]  Leo Egghe,et al.  Applications of the theory of Bradford's Law to the calculation of Leimkuhler's Law and to the completion of bibliographies , 1990, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[44]  Reena Sidhu,et al.  The gender imbalance in academic medicine: a study of female authorship in the United Kingdom , 2009, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[45]  J. McDowell,et al.  Two to Tango? Gender Differences in the Decisions to Publish and Coauthor , 2006 .

[46]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis , 2007, J. Informetrics.

[47]  Documentation , 2006 .

[48]  Amber E. Budden,et al.  Bang for Your Buck: Rejection Rates and Impact Factors in Ecological Journals , 2008 .

[49]  M. Symonds,et al.  Publication success in Nature and Science is not gender dependent. , 2005, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[50]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Sex differences in research funding, productivity and impact: an analysis of Québec university professors , 2011, Scientometrics.

[51]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  The Role of Gender in Scholarly Authorship , 2012, PloS one.

[52]  Silvia Sara Canetto,et al.  Publication Productivity and Career Advancement by Female and Male Psychology Faculty: The Case of Italy , 2011 .

[53]  W. Lemoine,et al.  Productivity patterns of men and women scientists in Venezuela , 1992, Scientometrics.

[54]  Peter van den Besselaar,et al.  Gender differences in scientific productivity: a persisting phenomenon? , 2012, Scientometrics.

[55]  R. Jagsi,et al.  Similarities and Differences in the Career Trajectories of Male and Female Career Development Award Recipients , 2011, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[56]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science , 2013, Nature.

[57]  Neil J. Gemmell,et al.  Gender Differences in Publication Output: Towards an Unbiased Metric of Research Performance , 2006, PloS one.

[58]  Carolyn A. Copenheaver,et al.  Lack of Gender Bias in Citation Rates of Publications by Dendrochronologists: What is Unique about this Discipline? , 2010 .

[59]  Leo Egghe.  The dual of Bradford's law , 1986, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[60]  Marieke van den Brink,et al.  Scouting for talent: appointment practices of women professors in academic medicine. , 2011, Social science & medicine.

[61]  Ángel Borrego,et al.  Scientific output and impact of postdoctoral scientists: a gender perspective , 2010, Scientometrics.

[62]  Patricia E. Gaynor,et al.  Determinants of Scholarly Productivity among Male and Female Economists , 2003 .

[63]  F. Veloso,et al.  The determinants of research output and impact: A study of Mexican researchers , 2007 .

[64]  Miranda Lee Pao,et al.  Lotka's law: A testing procedure , 1985, Inf. Process. Manag..

[65]  Heidi E. Prozesky,et al.  A Career-History Analysis of Gender Differences in Publication Productivity among South African Academics , 2008 .

[66]  María Bordons,et al.  Productivity, impact and publication habits by gender in the area of Materials Science , 2006, Scientometrics.

[67]  Sowmya R Rao,et al.  Activities, Productivity, and Compensation of Men and Women in the Life Sciences , 2010, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[68]  Ferdinand F. Leimkuhler,et al.  THE BRADFORD DISTRIBUTION , 1967 .

[69]  L. Silver,et al.  A persistent problem. , 2011, Journal of medical microbiology.

[70]  Molly Carnes,et al.  Interventions That Affect Gender Bias in Hiring: A Systematic Review , 2009, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[71]  R. Dellavalle,et al.  The write position , 2007, EMBO reports.

[72]  D. Ruble,et al.  Gender Development Research in Sex Roles: Historical Trends and Future Directions , 2011, Sex roles.

[73]  Shulamit Kahn,et al.  Does Science Promote Women? Evidence from Academia 1973-2001 , 2006 .

[74]  J. Eloy,et al.  Gender disparity among US anaesthesiologists: are women underrepresented in academic ranks and scholarly productivity? , 2013, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[75]  魏屹东,et al.  Scientometrics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Big Data.

[76]  Greg Tower,et al.  A Multidisciplinary Study Of Gender-Based Research Productivity In The World's Best Journals , 2011 .

[77]  Isabel Gómez,et al.  One step further in the production of bibliometric indicators at the micro level: Differences by gender and professional category of scientists , 2003, Scientometrics.

[78]  V. Larivière,et al.  International comparative performance of mental health research, 1980–2011 , 2013, European Neuropsychopharmacology.

[79]  Grant Lewison,et al.  The contribution of women in Brazilian science: A case study in astronomy, immunology and oceanography , 2003, Scientometrics.

[80]  Jon R. Sorensen,et al.  Gender differences in research productivity among criminal justice and criminology scholars , 2009 .

[81]  Darius M. Moshfeghi,et al.  Gender differences in compensation in academic medicine: the results from four neurological specialties within the University of California Healthcare System , 2014, Scientometrics.